|
大学生网络成瘾对注意力的影响研究
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨大学生网络成瘾对注意力的具体影响,并为高校和学生提供相应的建议,以帮助其克服这一问题。方法:本研究将选取300名大学生被试,使用Young网络成瘾量表对被试进行分组后,再使用Stroop范式对各分组被试进行注意力研究。使用SPSS 21.0对数据进行相关分析,对问卷数据进行独立样本t检验、方差分析。通过Pearson相关分析考察网络成瘾、注意力之间的相关性。以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。最终回收有效数据122份。结果:网瘾量表总分与Stroop实验正确率的相关系数为?0.177,二者无显著相关关系(P > 0.05);与平均反应时的相关系数为?0.203,二者具有显著性相关(P < 0.05);网络成瘾各组的注意力水平间的差异中,无网瘾与轻度网瘾组正确率差异均不显著(P > 0.05);无网瘾与中重度网瘾组正确率差异显著(P < 0.05),平均反应时差异不显著(P > 0.05);轻度和中重度组正确率和平均反应时差异均显著(P < 0.05)。结论:大学生网络成瘾与注意力水平存在负相关。网络成瘾水平越高,注意力表现越差。
Objective: To explore the effect of internet addiction disorder (IAD) on attention of college students, and to provide some advice for college students to overcome the problem. Methods: This study will select 300 college students to use the Young scale of Internet addiction, then use the Stroop paradigm to study the attention of the participants in each group. SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze the data. Independent sample t-test and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between Internet addiction and attention. There was significant difference in P < 0.05. Finally, 122 valid data were recovered. Results: The correlation coefficient between the total score of Internet addiction scale and the accuracy of Stroop test was ?0.177 (P > 0.05), and between the total score of Internet addiction scale and the average reaction time was ?0.203 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the correct rate between the non-internet addiction group and the mild internet addiction group (P > 0.05) , but there was significant difference in the correct rate between the non-internet addiction group and the moderate-severe internet addiction group (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference in mean reaction time (P > 0.05) , but significant difference in right rate and mean reaction time (P < 0.05) between mild and moderate-severe groups. Conclusion: There is a negative correlation between internet addiction and attention level of college students. The higher the level of internet addiction, the worse the performance of attention.
[1] | 陈俊, 刘海燕, 张积家(2007). Stroop效应的新进展——理论, 范式及影响因素. 心理科学, 30(2), 415-418. |
[2] | 戴珅懿, 马庆国, 王小毅(2011). 网络游戏成瘾者对成瘾相关线索的注意偏向: 一项ERP研究. 心理科学, 34(6), 1302-1307. |
[3] | 郭秀艳, 杨治良(2004). 实验心理学. 人民教育出版社. |
[4] | 黄建军, 曲跃铭, 付格西(2022). 大学生网络成瘾与学业拖延的关系: 注意控制的中介作用. 心理月刊, 17(21), 12-15. |
[5] | 黎娟娟, 黎文华(2022). Z世代大学生多重矛盾性社会心态解析. 中国青年研究, (7), 104-110 30. |
[6] | 彭琳璐, 郑显亮, 黄丽娟, 等(2023). 大学生网络成瘾症状变迁的横断历史研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 37(6), 526-531. |
[7] | 王安冉(2020). 大学生希望特质与学业拖延的关系及中介因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东中医药大学. |
[8] | 王艳秋(2020). 安徽省5所高校大学生网络成瘾的现况及影响因素调查研究. 硕士学位论文, 芜湖: 皖南医学院. |
[9] | 王云海, 秦东方(2015). 压力环境下大学生思想政治教育应对策略研究. 思想教育研究, (12), 59-61. |
[10] | 魏华, 周宗奎, 李雄, 等(2014). 大学生压力事件与网络游戏成瘾: 逃避动机的中介效应. 心理与行为研究, 12(3), 357-361. |
[11] | 张金健, 李玉雪, 陈红(2023). 大学生网络成瘾的发展轨迹: 基于潜变量混合增长模型的分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 31(2), 349-352. |
[12] | 张晶, 张玉姣, 申鲁军(2019). 不同程度手机网络过度使用者不同时程条件下注意偏向的特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 33(7), 545-549. |
[13] | 曾祥炎(2007). 基于E-Prime实现“实验心理学”实验教学的新方法. 实验技术与管理, 24(11), 89-91. |
[14] | Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1 |
[15] | Ferrari, J. R. (2001). Procrastination as Self-Regulation Failure of Performance: Effects of Cognitive Load, Self-Awareness, and Time Limits on “Working Best under Pressure”. European journal of Personality, 15, 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.413 |
[16] | Spada, M. (2014). An Overview of Problematic Internet Use. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.007 |
[17] | Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651 |
[18] | Young, K. (1998). Internet Addition: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology& Behavior, 1, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 |