全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中美高中数学教材习题的个案比较——以函数的概念为例
Case Comparison of Exercises in Chinese and American High School Mathematics Textbooks—Taking the Concept of Functions for Example

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.143455, PP. 853-862

Keywords: 数学高中教材,习题,中美比较,难度模型
Mathematics Textbook for Senior High School
, Exercises, Comparison between China and America, Difficulty Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于鲍建生提出的数学课程综合难度模型,以函数的概念为例,对中美初中数学教材的习题部分进行特征对比分析。结果表明:人教版教材习题在结果目标、推理、运算、知识点含量4个因素水平上高于美国教材,但背景因素水平略低于美国教材。通过中美教材比较,希望对我国数学高中在“函数的概念”方面的教学提供有益的启示。
Based on the comprehensive difficulty model of mathematics curriculum proposed by Jiansheng Bao and taking the concept of function as an example, this paper makes a comparative analysis on the features of exercises in Chinese and American senior high school mathematics textbooks. The results show that the exercise level of the textbook is higher than that of the American textbook in four factors: result objective, reasons, operations and knowledge point content, but the level of background is slightly lower than that of the American textbook. Through the comparison of Chinese and American textbooks, I hope to provide some useful enlightenment to the teaching of function concept in senior high school of mathematics in our country.

References

[1]  课程教材研究所, 中学数学课程教材研究开发中心. 普通高中教科书·数学·必修第一册[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2007.
[2]  Boyd, C.J., Cummins, J., Malloy, C., Carter, J. and Flores, A. (2004) Glencoe Mathematics. Geometry. The McGraw-Hill Companies, California.
[3]  教育部. 义务教育数学课程标准[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2001.
[4]  鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[5]  贾随军, 吕世虎, 李保臻. 中国与美国初中数学教材习题的个案比较——以“与三角形有关的角”为例[J]. 数学通报, 2014, 53(9): 17-23.
[6]  王鹏. 高中数学人教A版和IBDP版教材比较分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2018.
[7]  王丽玲. 小学数学教材“圆的周长”习题比较研究——以人教版, 青岛版和苏教版为例[J]. 课程教学研究, 2019(12): 56-61.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133