|
|
中文词汇加工的转置效应
|
Abstract:
在中文阅读中，词汇识别离不开对汉字位置信息的编码。本文介绍了中文词汇转置效应的研究范式，包括词水平下的单一呈现范式、掩蔽启动范式和句子水平下的自由阅读范式、边界范式；并介绍了词汇转置效应的影响因素，有转置发生的位置、词边界、语境信息和年龄，综述了目前关于中文词汇转置效应的研究成果，并对汉字位置编码的研究提出展望。
In Chinese reading, vocabulary recognition is inseparable from the encoding of positional infor-mation of Chinese characters. This article introduces the research paradigms of the Chinese lexical transposition effect, including the single presentation paradigm at the word level, the masking priming paradigm, the free reading paradigm at the sentence level, and the boundary paradigm. The article also discusses the influencing factors of the lexical transposition effect, including the po-sition of transposition occurrence, word boundaries, contextual information, and age. It reviews the current research findings on the Chinese lexical transposition effect and provides prospects for the study of Chinese character position encoding.
| [1] | 曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣(2023). 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用: 词汇判断和眼动研究. 心理学报, 55(2), 159-176. |
| [2] | 顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬(2022). 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 20(1), 1-7. |
| [3] | 顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青(2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 193-199. |
| [4] | 李肖琳(2022). 语境预测性和词边界信息对汉字位置加工影响的眼动研究. 硕士毕业论文, 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学. |
| [5] | 李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰(2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459-470. |
| [6] | 刘志伟(2022). 中文阅读的词汇转置效应. 博士毕业论文, 天津: 天津师范大学. |
| [7] | 刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 赵亚军(2020). 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响: 眼动证据. 心理学报, 52(9), 1031-1047. |
| [8] | 沈德立, 白学军, 臧传丽, 闫国利, 冯本才, 范晓红(2010). 词切分对初学者句子阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 42(2), 159-172. |
| [9] | 闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯(2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1966-1976. |
| [10] | 张妍萃(2022). 中文阅读中汉字身份信息与位置信息加工研究. 博士毕业论文, 天津: 天津师范大学. |
| [11] | Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading Spaced and Unspaced Chinese Text: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277 |
| [12] | Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter Transpositions within and across Morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni-tion, 31, 1327-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327 |
| [13] | Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and Predictability Effects on Event-Related Potentials during Reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010 |
| [14] | Davis, C. J. (2010). The Spatial Coding Model of Visual Word Identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738 |
| [15] | DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Sensitivity to Likely Upcoming Meaning and Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12093 |
| [16] | Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked Prim-ing with Graphemically Related Forms: Repetition or Partial Activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785 |
| [17] | Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The Effects of Character Transposition within and across Words in Chinese Reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272-281. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5 |
| [18] | Gu, J., Zhou, J., Bao, Y., Liu, J., Perea, M., & Li, X. (2023). The Ef-fect of Transposed-Character Distance in Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49, 464-476.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001180 |
| [19] | Li, X. S., Huang, L., Yao, P., & Hy？n？, J. (2022). Universal and Specific Reading Mechanisms across Different Writing Systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00022-6 |
| [20] | Liu, Y. P., Guo, S. Y., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Word Pre-dictability Affects Saccade Length in Chinese Reading: An Evaluation of the Dynamic-Adjustment Model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1891-1899.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1357-x |
| [21] | Liu, Z. W., Li, Y., & Wang, J. X. (2021). Context But Not Reading Speed Modulates Transposed-Word Effects in Chinese Reading. Acta Psychologica, 215, Article ID: 103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103272 |
| [22] | McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Acti-vation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375 |
| [23] | Milledge, S. V., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Parafoveal Pre-Processing in Children Reading English: The Importance of External Letters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 197-208.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01806-8 |
| [24] | Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Para-foveal Preprocessing of Word Initial Trigrams during Reading in Adults and Children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 411-432.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000175 |
| [25] | Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). The Influence of Chil-dren’s Reading Ability on Initial Letter Position Encoding during a Reading-Like Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1186-1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000989 |
| [26] | Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 |
| [27] | Rayner, K. (1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618-660.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618 |
| [28] | Rayner, K. (2009). Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461 |
| [29] | Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pol-latsek, A. (2006). The Effect of Word Frequency, Word Predictability, and Font Difficulty on the Eye Movements of Young and Older Readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448 |
| [30] | Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 4-34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267 |
| [31] | Vergara-Martínez, M., Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Swaab, T. Y. (2013). ERP Correlates of Letter Identity and Letter Position Are Modulated by Lexical Frequency. Brain & Language, 125, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.009 |
| [32] | Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Chang, M., Paterson, K. B., White, S. J., & McGowan, V. A. (2016). Adult Age Differences in Eye Movements during Reading: The Evidence from Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73, 584-593.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw036 |
| [33] | Whitney, C. (2001). How the Brain Encodes the Order of Letters in a Printed Word: The SERIOL Model and Selective Literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196158 |
| [34] | Yakup, M., Abliz, W., Sereno, J., & Perea, M. (2014). How Is Letter Posi-tion Coding Attained in Scripts with Position-Dependent Allography? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0621-6 |
| [35] | Zhao, S., Li, L., Chang, M., Xu, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, J., & Paterson, K. B. (2019). Older Adults Make Greater Use of Word Predictability in Chinese Reading. Psychology and Aging, 34, 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000382 |
