全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improved Patent Quality of Strategy Choice

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2024.121008, PP. 108-128

Keywords: Innovation Subjects, Patent Quality, Consumers’ Choice, Improvement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In an open economy, an appropriate patent system is capable of improving the quality of patents. The behavior of governments, enterprises, university research organizations, and intermediary agencies as innovation subjects may also affect patent quality. This work verifies consumers’ choice under improved patent quality in terms of patent utilization or purchasers. A model is established on the basis of several variables, including residents’ income, patented product price, patented product categories, and complaint rate. The influencing factors that may improve patent quality are also analyzed. Findings show that a product with a considerable number of patents tends to exhibit good quality, but the quality improvement of a highly over-priced patented product may be hindered. Innovation subjects should strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights by improving patent quality.

References

[1]  Guan, J. C., Gao, X., & Xu, N. L. (2008). Evaluation of Patent Quality Based on h-Index and International Comparison. Studies in Science of Science, No. 5, 932-937.
[2]  Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2004). Are Scientific Indicators of Patent Quality Useful to Investors? Journal of Empirical Finance, 11, 91-107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2003.01.001
[3]  Hu, Y. (2007). Preparation and Implementation of Industry Patent Strategies. Management World, No. 8, 165-166.
[4]  Li, C. Y., & Shi, R. (2008). Exploration on Patent Quality Indicator Evaluation System. Modern Information, No. 2, 146-149.
[5]  Li, Z. Y., Meng, F. S., & Cao, X. (2010). Study on Three-Dimensional Evaluation System of Patents. Information Science, No. 10, 1569-1573.
[6]  Ma, Z. F. (2010). A Reconsideration of Patent Essential Connotation and Mission of Patent System from the Perspective of a Low Patented Technology Commercialization Rate. Science& Technology Progress and Policy, 27, 99-102.
[7]  Nicholas, T. (2011). Did R&D Firms Used to Patent? Evidence from the First Innovation Surveys. Journal of Economic History, 71, 1032-1059.
[8]  Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries during the Post-1950 Period. Economic Journal, 97, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w1650
[9]  Thomas, J. R. (2002). The Responsibility of the Rule Maker: Comparative Approaches to Patent Administration Reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 17, 728-761.
[10]  Wan, X. L., & Zhu, X. Z. (2009). Status and Trends of Patent Quality Indicator Research in International Perspective. Journal of Intelligence, No. 7, 50-54.
[11]  Wang, X. L., & Zhu, X. Z. (2008). The Indicator System and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Patent Value. Science Research Management, No. 2, 185-191.
[12]  Wu, J., & Ye, C. M. (2012). Measurement of the Contribution of Patent Output in Central Region to Economic Growth. Productivity Research, No. 5, 95-98.
[13]  Yang, W. (1999). Technological Innovative Property Right (pp. 87-89). Tsinghua University Press.
[14]  Yu, J. J., & Tan, S. M. (2009). Application of the Evaluation Index System of Patent Portfolio Analysis. Journal of Intelligence, No. 12, 152-155.
[15]  Yuan, X. D., & Liu, Z. L. (2011). Patent Quality Problems and Coping Strategies. Science and Technology Management Research, No. 9, 156-160.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133