全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

How Your Teaching Strategy Affects Your Students’ Learning Outcomes; Reflections on Technical Report Writing Course at Gulf University

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2023.1411146, PP. 2313-2332

Keywords: Gulf University, Unit of General Studies, Teaching English for Academic Pur-poses, Active Learning, Blended Learning and Learning Outcomes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The current study aimed to investigate how the teaching strategy affects the Gulf University students’ Learning outcomes related to Technical Report Writing Course (ENG 119). Technical Report Writing is a 3 credits hours university-required course that aims at presenting a comprehensive overview of the essential elements of effective technical report writing and helping undergraduate students to develop the practical skills required to write successfully. The study used a quasi-experimental research approach with one group post-assessment. The sample of the study was composed of 79 male and female students who registered for (ENG 119) during the Spring Semester of the academic year 2022/2023. Data analysis revealed that the students achieved the course-intended learning outcomes with a high rate of (83.85%), the results also revealed that students achieved a level of mastery in the course by 79.87%, which exceeded the proposed /estimated value of mastery level of (75%) is statistically significant at the level of significance .05 when compared to a hypothetical level of mastery (75%). One-sample t-test results showed that the utilized teaching strategy significantly affects the Gulf University student’s achievement in Technical Report Writing Course (ENG119) and lead to a mean of achievement of more than 75, i.e. GU students scored in Technical Report Writing topped the estimated mean of 75 (M = 79.87, SD = 16.41) than found in the population as a whole, t (78) = 2.640, p = .010. While the results of the data analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the average male and female students, though the mean of the female group slightly outweighed the mean of the male group (female average = 80.57, Std. Deviation = 14.89), from the male group (Mean = 79.32, Std. Deviation = 18.34), t (77) = .738 not significant at p (.01). Based on these results the study recommends using blended learning in teaching English for Adamic Purposes and it is recommended that Gulf University train the faculty and students on how to make use of blended learning before the implementation.

References

[1]  Al-Jarf, R. (2022). Teaching English for Polytechnic Purposes: Guidelines for an Integrated, Communicative Approach. Online Submission, Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4, 113-124.
https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.2.11
[2]  Alrouji, O. O. (2020). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Enhancing Saudi Students’ Competence in Paragraph Writing. English Language Teaching, 13, 72-82.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n9p72
[3]  Alsamadani, H. A. (2023). Doctorless in Saudi EFL Context: Potential Effects on Students’ Writing Skill and Attitudes towards Learning English. Arab World English Journal, 13, 27-37.
https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.2
[4]  Alshayban, A. (2022). Teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) to Saudi Arabian Banking Employees. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 27, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.27.01
[5]  Corcoran, J. N., Williams, J., & Johnston, K. P. (2022). English for Academic Purposes in Canada: Results from an Exploratory National Survey. BC TEAL Journal, 7, 55-84.
[6]  Han, J. Y., Zhao, Y. L., Liu, M. H., & Zhang, J. (2021). The Development of College English Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): From General English to English for Academic Purposes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 609-621.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09689-7
[7]  Hashemi, A., & Si Na, K. (2020). The Effects of Using Blended Learning in Teaching and Learning English: A Review of Literature. Online Submission, The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 18, 173-179.
[8]  Rao, V. C. S. (2020). Academic Language Proficiency: English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Online Submission, Journal for Research Scholars, and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 4.
[9]  Walsh Marr, J. (2021). The Promise and Precarity of Critical Pedagogy in English for Academic Purposes. BC TEAL Journal, 6, 132-141.
[10]  Wang, C. Y. (2021). Employing Blended Learning to Enhance Learners’ English Conversation: A Preliminary Study of Teaching with Hitutor. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2407-2425.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10363-5
[11]  Yang, C.-H., Huang, Y. L., & Huang, P. W. (2022). A Comparison of the Learning Efficiency of Business English between the Blended Teaching and Conventional Teaching for College Students. English Language Teaching, 15, 44-53.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n9p44
[12]  Zhang, R. (2021). Blended Course Evaluation in the Context of English for Specific Purposes: Accountability and Development. SAGE Open, 11.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054502

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133