全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

当代典型调解范例对乡村治理的启示
Enlightenment of Contemporary Typical Mediation on Rural Governance

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116898, PP. 6263-6268

Keywords: 无讼,调解制度,乡村治理
Non-Litigation
, Mediation System, Rural Governance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

中国传统调解制度丰富而深厚,不能以一文论之。文之重心仅在于厘清传统调解制度的发展、思想源流和目标,探寻传统调解制度与现代调解制度在思想文化、制度体系、治理模式等方面的相通之处,以启示现代调解制度。现代调解制度在基层治理中大放异彩,涌现出“枫桥经验”“无讼”社区等治理模式。乡村治理过程中既要汲取传统调解制度的经验智慧,也要高度关注今天的典型调解范例,以充分发挥调解制度在乡村治理中的重要作用。
The Chinese traditional mediation system is rich and profound, so it can’t be discussed with one article. The focus of this paper is only to clarify the development, ideological origin and goal of traditional mediation system, and to explore the similarities between traditional mediation system and modern mediation system in terms of ideological culture, institutional system and governance mode, so as to enlighten modern mediation system. Modern mediation system shines brilliantly in grass-roots governance, with the emergence of “Fengqiao Experience” and “Non-litigation Community” governance models. In order to give full play to the important role of mediation system in rural governance, we should not only absorb the experience and wisdom of traditional mediation system, but also pay close attention to today’s typical mediation examples.

References

[1]  王颖慧, 谢尚果. 乡村振兴背景下传统无讼法律文化再认识——基于广西玉林市博白县民富村的调研[J]. 河北法学, 2021, 39(6): 133-146.
[2]  费成康. 中国的家法族规[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2002: 310.
[3]  王微. 乡村“三治”的切入点、着力点和落脚点[J]. 人民论坛, 2020(4): 68-69.
[4]  卢芳霞. “枫桥经验”: 中国特色调解制度的时代叙事[J]. 民间法, 2019, 23(1): 273-287.
[5]  毋爱斌. 对我国人民调解各地模式的考察[J]. 法治论坛, 2009(2): 14-24.
[6]  罗冠男. 中国传统社会基层治理的法律机制与经验[J]. 政法论坛, 2021, 39(2): 129-137.
[7]  齐树洁, 熊云辉. 福建法院创建“无讼社区”活动的法理分析[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2014(1): 81-91.
[8]  宋才发, 张术麟. 论新时代乡村振兴的三维解读[J]. 学习论坛, 2019(4): 32-37.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133