全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

《新加坡调解公约》背景下完善我国民商事调解机制的探索
Exploration of Improving China’s Civil and Commercial Mediation Mechanism in the Context of the Singapore Convention on Mediation

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.115610, PP. 4297-7305

Keywords: 《新加坡调解公约》,民商事调解,完善调解机制
Singapore Convention on Mediation
, Conciliation in Civil and Commercial Matters, Improving the Conciliation Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2019年,《新加坡调解公约》(以下简称《公约》)在新加坡正式签订并发布,该《公约》对现存的国际调解机制进行了填充,对国际经济的发展起到了至关重要的作用。同时也加快了我国民商事调解业务在新时代的发展步伐。基于《公约》给我国带来广泛而深远的积极影响,我国致力于《公约》的实施和推广。我国民商事调解存在基本法缺位、机构和人员专业性不足、调解模式主导性较强和和解协议执行难度大等问题,这些问题给我国很好地适用《公约》带来了挑战。我国可以尝试通过加强调解的相关立法、推动调解机构建设、提升调解员的专业素养和增强和解协议的执行机制等方式来更好地同《公约》接轨,为中国能够更好地参与全球治理和加强涉外法治建设提供坚实的法治保障。
In 2019, the Singapore Convention on Mediation (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”) was officially signed and released in Singapore, which populates the existing international mediation mechanism and plays a crucial role in the development of the international economy. It has also accelerated the pace of development of civil and commercial mediation business in China in the new era. Based on the extensive and far-reaching positive impact of the “Convention” on China, China is committed to the implementation and promotion of the “Convention”. The absence of a basic law on civil and commercial mediation in China, the lack of professionalism of institutions and personnel, the dominance of the mediation model and the difficulty in enforcing settlement agreements have posed challenges to the good application of the “Convention” in China. China can try to better align itself with the “Convention” by strengthening the relevant legislation on mediation, promoting the construction of mediation institutions, upgrading the professionalism of mediators and enhancing the enforcement mechanism of settlement agreements, so as to provide a solid guarantee of the rule of law for the better participation of China in global governance and the strengthening of the rule of law in relation to foreign affairs.

References

[1]  赵勇. 《新加坡调解公约》与“一带一路”商事调解机制建构[J]. 福建江夏学院学报, 2023, 13(1): 38-46.
[2]  冯子涵. 《新加坡调解公约》与中国法律制度的冲突与应对[J]. 湖湘法学评论, 2022, 2(2): 103-117.
https://doi.org/10.20034/j.cnki.hxfxpl.2022.02.009
[3]  蔡伟. 《新加坡调解公约》的困境和应对[J]. 清华法学, 2022, 16(2): 193-208.
[4]  McFadden, D. (2014) Culture, Business Negotiation and Mediation: Understanding Cultural Differences, Communication Styles and Finding Mutual Understanding. Asian Dispute Review, 16, 132-136.
[5]  熊浩. 语境论视野下的《新加坡调解公约》与中国商事调解立法: 以调解模式为中心[J]. 法学家, 2022(6): 17-30+191.
https://doi.org/10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2022.06.002
[6]  北京国际仲裁中心. 调解员守则[EB/OL]. https://www.bjac.org.cn/page/tj/tiaojieyuanshouze.html, 2023-06-14.
[7]  上海经贸商事调解中心. 调解员守则[EB/OL]. http://www.scmc.org.cn/page67?article_id=209&_l=en&menu_id=98, 2023-06-14.
[8]  许军珂. 《新加坡调解公约》框架下国际商事和解协议效力问题研究[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2020(3): 3-15.
[9]  李喜莲, 唐海琴. 法院调解自愿原则的实现路径[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 41(4): 81-84.
https://doi.org/10.13715/j.cnki.jxupss.2017.04.015
[10]  汤霞. 诉调对接机制下我国当前商会调处商事纠纷的困境与破解[J]. 现代法治研究, 2019(1): 85-93.
[11]  宋锡祥, 田聪. “一带一路”视野下国际商事争端解决机制的构建[J]. 海峡法学, 2019, 21(2): 26-36.
[12]  冯冬冬. 《新加坡调解公约》背景下中国国际商事调解协议执行机制的完善[J]. 国际法研究, 2023(2): 143-160.
[13]  齐树洁. 域外调解制度新发展概述[J]. 人民调解, 2019(7): 56-58.
https://doi.org/10.19380/j.cnki.cn11-2790/d.2019.07.023
[14]  唐琼琼. 《新加坡调解公约》背景下我国商事调解制度的完善[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 36(4): 116-129.
[15]  Chua, E. (2019) The Singapore Conven-tion on Mediation: A Brighter Future for Asian Dispute Resolution. Asian Journal of International Law, 9, 195-205.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251318000309

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133