|
Dispute Settlement 2023
国家安全与经济全球化的冲突与协调
|
Abstract:
国家安全与经济全球化紧密联系、相互影响,当代安全政策为偏离普通贸易和投资规则提供了潜在的理由。关贸总协定中的“国家安全例外”条款赋予了国家在安全范围判断上极大的自由裁量权。实践中,国家安全内涵与外延的扩张对国际法庭善意履行原则审查、实质性与程序性审查均带来了挑战。面对该冲突,可以从实体法和程序法的角度探寻条款内部合法性,并从司法和非司法化角度寻求条款外部合法性,提出管理经济争端混合政治和法律的新兴战略,创新协调国家安全与经济全球化发展的新框架。
National security and economic globalization are closely linked and interacted, and contemporary security policies provide potential justification for deviations from ordinary trade and investment rules. The “national security exception” clause in the GATT gives states great discretion in determining the scope of security. In practice, the expansion of the connotation and scope of national security has posed challenges to the review of the principle of good faith performance, substantive and procedural review by international tribunals. In the face of this conflict, the internal legitimacy of the clause can be explored from the perspectives of substantive and procedural law, and the external legitimacy of the clause can be sought from the perspectives of judicial and non-judicialization, proposing an emerging strategy for managing economic disputes with mixed politics and law, and innovating a new framework for reconciling national security with the development of economic globalization.
[1] | 彭姝祎. 当今人类社会面临的非传统安全[J]. 人民论坛, 2020(17): 116-119. |
[2] | 张丽娟, 郭若楠. 国际贸易规则中的“国家安全例外”条款探析[J]. 国际论坛, 2020(3): 66-79. |
[3] | 丁丽柏. 论WTO对安全例外条款扩张适用的规制[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(2): 127-140. |
[4] | 黄志雄. WTO 安全例外条款面临的挑战与我国的对策: 以网络安全问题为主要背景[J]. 国际经济法学刊, 2014, 21(4): 141-156. |
[5] | 梁咏. 论国际贸易体制中的安全例外再平衡[J]. 法学, 2020(2): 142-155. |
[6] | 丁丽柏, 陈喆. 论WTO对安全例外条款扩张适用的规制[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(2): 127-140. |
[7] | 张庆麟. 公共利益梘野下的国际投资协定新发展[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2014: 35. |
[8] | 陶立峰. 外国投资国家安全审查的可问责性分析[J]. 法学, 2016(1): 67-75. |
[9] | 刘敬东. WTO法律制度中的善意原则[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学文献出版社, 2009: 81. |
[10] | Schill, S. and Briese, R. (2009) “If the State Considers”: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settle-ment. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 13, 61-120. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413-90000037 |
[11] | 杨署东, 谢卓君. 跨境数据流动贸易规制之例外条款: 定位、范式与反思[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(8): 9-10. |
[12] | 马光. FTA数据跨境流动规制的三种例外选择适用[J]. 政法论坛, 2021(5): 14-24. |
[13] | 姚天冲, 周智琦. WTO安全例外条款下跨境数据流动安全的中国方案[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 34(2): 63-73. |
[14] | Lester, S. and Zhu, H. (2019) Proposal for “Rebalancing” to Deal with “National Security” Trade Re-strictions. Fordham International at Law Journal, 42, 1450-1474. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368338 |
[15] | 李昌平. WTO程序机制改革的国际法思考[J]. 国际展望, 2019(6): 1-19. |
[16] | 曾令量. 世界贸易组织法[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 1996. |
[17] | 余敏友. 论世贸组织法律救济的特性[J]. 现代法学, 2006, 28(6): 14-24. |