全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于国际法视阈对欧盟《反经济胁迫条例》的考量
Consideration of the EU Anti-Economic Coercion Regulation Based on the International Law Perspective

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2023.94180, PP. 1327-1332

Keywords: 胁迫,反胁迫,反措施,国家责任
Coercion
, Anti-Coercion, Countermeasures, National Responsibility

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

国家或国家集团通过经济、金融、贸易等形式的对外制裁以达到其政治和经济目的,已经成为目前国际社会的常见现象。在此背景下欧盟委员会出台《反经济胁迫条例》草案,以此加入这场制裁与反制裁的无限循环斗争中。该草案所言胁迫已经完全超出了传统国际法上的胁迫,并且认为反胁迫就是国际法中的反措施,甚至可以对不属于国际法主体的私人或者企业使用。认定胁迫需要符合国际法,使用反胁迫措施也并非没有限制。
The use of external sanctions by countries or groups of countries in the form of economic, finical and trade sanctions to achieve their political and economic goals has become a common phenomenon in the international community nowadays. In this context, the European Commission has introduced the draft Anti-Coercion Regulation, thereby joining the infinite cycle of sanctions and countersanctions. The draft regulation refers to coercion that goes beyond the traditional international law of coercion and considers anti-coercion as a countermeasure in international law, which can be used even against private individuals or companies that are not subjects of international law. A finding of coercion requires compliance with international law, and the use of anti-coercive measures is not without limits.

References

[1]  清华大学战略与安全研究中心美欧研究项目课题组. 《欧盟〈反胁迫条例〉: 内容、动因与前景》[EB/OL].
https://ciss.tsinghua.edu.cn/upload_files/atta/1642162808958_66.pdf, 2023-03-21.
[2]  Reuter, P. (1979) Eighth Report on the Question of Treaties Concluded between States and International Organizations or between Two or More International Organizations. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. 2, p. 138.
[3]  McDougal, M.S. and Feliciano, F.P. (1958) International Coercion and World Public Order: The General Principles of the Law of War. Yale Law Journal, 67, 771-845.
https://doi.org/10.2307/793960
[4]  van Wynen Thomas, A. and Thomas Jr., A.J. (2009) The Organization of American States. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, 60-161.
[5]  Jamnejad, M. and Wood, M. (2009) The Principle of Non-Intervention. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, 345-382.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509005858
[6]  Joyner, C.C. (1984) The Transnational Boycott as Economic Coercion in International Law: Policy, Place, and Practice. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 17, 205-286.
[7]  Farer, T.J. (1985) Political and Economic Coercion in Contemporary International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 79, 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2201710
[8]  Corten, O. (2010) The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law. Hart Publishing Press, Portland, 76-77.
[9]  石静霞. WTO《多方临时上诉仲裁安排》: 基于仲裁的上诉替代[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(6): 167-185.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133