%0 Journal Article
%T 基于国际法视阈对欧盟《反经济胁迫条例》的考量<br> Consideration of the EU Anti-Economic Coercion Regulation Based on the International Law Perspective
%A 龚书琪
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 1327-1332
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/DS.2023.94180
%X 国家或国家集团通过经济、金融、贸易等形式的对外制裁以达到其政治和经济目的，已经成为目前国际社会的常见现象。在此背景下欧盟委员会出台《反经济胁迫条例》草案，以此加入这场制裁与反制裁的无限循环斗争中。该草案所言胁迫已经完全超出了传统国际法上的胁迫，并且认为反胁迫就是国际法中的反措施，甚至可以对不属于国际法主体的私人或者企业使用。认定胁迫需要符合国际法，使用反胁迫措施也并非没有限制。<br />
The use of external sanctions by countries or groups of countries in the form of economic, finical and trade sanctions to achieve their political and economic goals has become a common phenomenon in the international community nowadays. In this context, the European Commission has introduced the draft Anti-Coercion Regulation, thereby joining the infinite cycle of sanctions and countersanctions. The draft regulation refers to coercion that goes beyond the traditional international law of coercion and considers anti-coercion as a countermeasure in international law, which can be used even against private individuals or companies that are not subjects of international law. A finding of coercion requires compliance with international law, and the use of anti-coercive measures is not without limits.
%K 胁迫，反胁迫，反措施，国家责任<br> Coercion
%K Anti-Coercion
%K Countermeasures
%K National Responsibility
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=68614