|
|
面对亲密恋人，你会降低道德要求吗？
|
Abstract:
本研究采用改进后的模拟小人任务，探究大学生面对陌生人或者恋人时，道德趋避的一致性反应。实验1验证了道德趋避的相容效应；实验2在实验1的基础上，保留道德趋避一致性的反应，结果表明认知对象是恋人还是陌生人，对个体的反应并没有影响；实验3探究道德趋避不一致行为，结果发现，相比于面对陌生人，当面对恋人时，无论是道德–远离反应还是不道德–靠近反应都会更快。结论：人们更倾向于接近道德个体而远离不道德个体；在道德趋避一致的情况下，恋爱关系不影响趋避反应；在道德趋避冲突的情况下，恋爱关系影响趋避反应。
This study used an improved manikin task to explore the consistency of moral approach-avoidance behavior of college students when faced with strangers or lovers. Experiment 1 verified the compatibility effect of moral approach-avoidance behavior; Experiment 2 built on Experiment 1 by retaining moral approach-avoidance consistent behavior, and the results showed that whether the cognitive object was a lover or a stranger did not affect the individual’s response; Experiment 3 explored moral approach-avoidance inconsistent behavior, and the results found that when faced with a lover compared to a stranger, both the moral-avoidance reaction and the immoral-approach reaction were faster. Conclusions: People prefer to approach moral individuals and stay away from immoral individuals; romantic relationships do not affect approach-avoidance behavior in the case of moral approach-avoidance consistent condition; romantic relationships do affect approach-avoidance behavior in the case of moral approach-avoidance inconsistent condition.
| [1] | 丁凤琴, 孙逸舒(2020). 具身视角下道德概念净脏隐喻的特征、影响因素与未来展望. 心理科学, 43(6), 1327-1332. |
| [2] | 丁凤琴, 王冬霞(2019). 道德概念具身隐喻及其影响因素: 来自元分析的证据. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1540-1555. |
| [3] | 李靖阳(2017). 体型大小认知在道德趋避行为中的作用. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学. |
| [4] | 鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪(2017). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射: 双向性及不平衡性. 心理学报, 49(2), 186-196. |
| [5] | 马惠霞, 宋英杰, 刘瑞凝, 朱雅丽, 杨琼, 郝胤庭(2016). 情绪的动机维度对趋避行为的影响. 心理科学, 39(5), 1026-1032. |
| [6] | 牛忠辉, 蒋赛, 邱俊杰, 申之美, 张锋(2010). 社会距离对他人行为表征的影响: 评价内容效价的作用. 应用心理学, 16(4), 291-300. |
| [7] | 宋慧萍(2015). 趋避行为对道德判断的影响. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学. |
| [8] | 王汉林, 蒋泽亮, 冯晓慧, 鲁忠义(2020). 道德概念的空间形象性: 语言因素和具身因素的共同作用. 心理学报, 52(2), 128-138. |
| [9] | 王圣, 莫雷(2017). 心理距离和空间距离对道德判断的影响. 见 第二十届全国心理学学术会议——心理学与国民心理健康摘要集. 中国心理学会. |
| [10] | 王伟伟(2014). 人际亲密度对自我道德行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 宁波: 宁波大学. |
| [11] | 王锃, 鲁忠义(2013). 道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响. 心理学报, 45(5), 538-545. |
| [12] | 谢子燊(2019). 轻重隐喻与重量大小对道德判断的影响研究. 心理学进展, 9(6), 1008-1018. |
| [13] | 颜志雄, 邹霞, 燕良轼, 范伟, 谭千保, 邱小艳(2015). 道德两难判断中亲属关系的认知研究: 来自erps的证据. 心理科学, 38(1), 54-61. |
| [14] | 袁杰, 陈建, 郭世纯, 傅世敏(2013). 热恋期爱情的无意识ERP研究. 见 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议论文集. 中国心理学会. |
| [15] | 郑健, 刘力, 史佳鑫, 赵显, 黄桢炜(2013). 趋利避害相容效应的定义、理论与研究范式. 心理科学进展, 21(9), 1686- 1695. |
| [16] | Beauregard, M., Lévesque, J., & Bourgouin, P. (2001). Neural Correlates of Conscious Self-Regulation of Emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, Article No. RC165. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-j0001.2001 |
| [17] | Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F. (2011). Blind Ethics: Closing One’s Eyes Polarizes Moral Judgments and Discourages Dishonest Behavior. Cognition, 118, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.008 |
| [18] | Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2009). How Extending Your Middle Finger Affects Your Perception of Others: Learned Movements Influence Concept Accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 123-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.012 |
| [19] | Diener, E., Kanazawa, S., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (2015). Why People Are in a Generally Good Mood. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 235-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544467 |
| [20] | Elliot, A. J. (2008). Approach and Avoidance Motivation. In A. J. Elliot, & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation (pp. 3-14). Psychology Press. |
| [21] | Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring Passionate Love in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383-410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4 |
| [22] | Hill, P. L., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). The Ups and Downs of the Moral Personality: Why It’s Not So Black and White. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 520-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.014 |
| [23] | Hornsey, M. J. (2003). Linking Superiority Bias in the Interpersonal and Intergroup Domains. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598457 |
| [24] | Krieglmeyer, R., Deutsch, R., De Houwer, J., & De Raedt, R. (2010). Being Moved: Valence Activates Approach-Avoidance Behavior Independently of Evaluation and Ap-proach-Avoidance Intentions. Psychological Science, 21, 607-613.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610365131 |
| [25] | Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5 |
| [26] | Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral Psychology Is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867 |
| [27] | Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x |
| [28] | Sedikides, C., Skowronski, J. J., & Gaertner, L. (2004). Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Motivation: From the Laboratory to an Evolutionary Context. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 61-79.
https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.2.2004.1-2.4 |
| [29] | Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of Instrumental Responses as a Function of Compatibility with the Meaning of Eliciting Verbal Signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047274 |
