%0 Journal Article
%T 面对亲密恋人，你会降低道德要求吗？<br>Do You Lower Your Moral Standards When Facing an Intimate Lover?
%A 熊文文
%A 黄辛隐
%J Advances in Psychology
%P 2339-2348
%@ 2160-7281
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AP.2023.136290
%X 本研究采用改进后的模拟小人任务，探究大学生面对陌生人或者恋人时，道德趋避的一致性反应。实验1验证了道德趋避的相容效应；实验2在实验1的基础上，保留道德趋避一致性的反应，结果表明认知对象是恋人还是陌生人，对个体的反应并没有影响；实验3探究道德趋避不一致行为，结果发现，相比于面对陌生人，当面对恋人时，无论是道德–远离反应还是不道德–靠近反应都会更快。结论：人们更倾向于接近道德个体而远离不道德个体；在道德趋避一致的情况下，恋爱关系不影响趋避反应；在道德趋避冲突的情况下，恋爱关系影响趋避反应。<br />
This study used an improved manikin task to explore the consistency of moral approach-avoidance behavior of college students when faced with strangers or lovers. Experiment 1 verified the compatibility effect of moral approach-avoidance behavior; Experiment 2 built on Experiment 1 by retaining moral approach-avoidance consistent behavior, and the results showed that whether the cognitive object was a lover or a stranger did not affect the individual’s response; Experiment 3 explored moral approach-avoidance inconsistent behavior, and the results found that when faced with a lover compared to a stranger, both the moral-avoidance reaction and the immoral-approach reaction were faster. Conclusions: People prefer to approach moral individuals and stay away from immoral individuals; romantic relationships do not affect approach-avoidance behavior in the case of moral approach-avoidance consistent condition; romantic relationships do affect approach-avoidance behavior in the case of moral approach-avoidance inconsistent condition.
%K 趋避行为，道德，具身认知，模拟小人范式，浪漫爱情<br>Approach-Avoidance Behavior
%K Morality
%K Embodied Cognition
%K The Manikin Tasks
%K Romantic Relationships
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=67173