|
对离婚冷静期条款的思考与完善
|
Abstract:
离婚冷静期制度是一种设置在原有的离婚程序上的前置程序,有助于避免或者减少情绪冲动引发的轻率离婚。离婚冷静期条款中存在缺乏对离婚冷静期例外情形的规定、对夫妻权利义务关系规定不明确等问题。域外设置离婚冷静期的例外情形、区分离婚冷静期的非常规化情形值得我国借鉴。我国离婚冷静期条款中应增加离婚冷静期的例外规定、明确离婚冷静期内夫妻权利义务关系。
The divorce calm period system is a pre-procedure set on the original divorce procedure, which helps to avoid or reduce the reckless divorce caused by emotional impulse. There are some problems in the provisions of the cooling-off period of divorce, such as the lack of provisions on exceptions to the cooling-off period of divorce, and the unclear provisions on the relationship between the rights and obligations of the couple. The exceptions to the setting of the cooling-off period of divorce and the unconventional circumstances to distinguish the cooling-off period of divorce outside the country are worthy of our reference. China should add the exception of the cooling-off period of di-vorce to the cooling-off period of divorce, and clarify the rights and obligations of the couple during the cooling-off period of divorce.
[1] | 张剑源. 离婚是否真的需要冷静——对《民法典》第1077条的法理讨论[J]. 法学家, 2022(3): 1-13. |
[2] | 姜大伟. 离婚冷静期: 由经验到逻辑——《民法典》1077条评析[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(4): 121-131. |
[3] | 郭剑平. 我国离婚冷静期制度构建的法理学思考[J]. 社会科学家, 2018(7): 26-34. |
[4] | 夏沁. 民法典登记离婚冷静期条款的解释论[J]. 法学家, 2020(5): 24-38. |
[5] | 马智勇. “离婚冷静期”制度的生成逻辑及其反思[J]. 法学家, 2022(3): 14-28. |
[6] | 张越然. 关于离婚冷静期制度的中外比较探讨[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2021. |
[7] | 张力. 《民法典》离婚冷静期条款的适用原理: 内涵与外延[J]. 法治研究, 2022(1): 36-44. |