|
论破产管理人的权力扩张与责任承担
|
Abstract:
在公司进入破产程序,管理人接管债务人后,其权力与职责应当贯穿于破产程序的各个环节。然现有法律框架下,管理人的调查权被限缩;重整、预重整程序中管理人制度存在留白;且对于清算责任的追究,只赋予债权人请求赔偿的权利,管理人无权追责。这种基于侵权思维的直接单线救济方式,不仅在实施上多有困难,更是对管理人地位的虚置。继地方相关文件的纷纷出台,管理人可追究经营者赔偿责任,得以窥见管理人权力扩张之趋势与债权人保护之加强,这实则为管理人中心地位的彰显。管理人职责的扩大,势必需要明确的管理人监督和责任机制与之匹配。基于此,本文拟对于管理人的权力架构与责任承担提出初步的设想,以期进一步完善管理人制度。
After the company enters the bankruptcy process and the bankruptcy administrator takes over the debtor, its power and responsibility should run through all aspects of the bankruptcy process. However, under the existing legal framework, the administrator’s investigation power is limited; the bankruptcy administrator system has blank space in the Reorganization and Prepackaged Reorganization process; and for the liquidation responsibility, only the creditors have the right to claim compensation, and the bankruptcy administrator has no right to pursue accountability. This kind of direct single-line relief method based on tort thinking is not only difficult in the implementation, but also the empty position of the bankruptcy administrator. Following the release of relevant local documents, the administrator may pursue the operator for compensation, it was possible to see the trend of the expansion of bankruptcy administrator’s power and the strengthening of creditor’s protection. This is actually a manifestation of the central position of the bankruptcy administrator. The expansion of bankruptcy administrator’s responsibility is bound to require a clear administrator supervision and responsibility mechanism to match it. Based on this, this paper intends to put forward a preliminary idea for the bankruptcy administrator’s power structure and responsibility, in order to further improve the bankruptcy administrator system.
[1] | 王欣新. 论新破产法中管理人制度的设置新思路[J]. 法学杂志, 2004(5): 34. |
[2] | 王欣新. 绝境再生——破产法市场化法治化实施之路[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2022: 1. |
[3] | 全国首例: 破产管理人在执行案件中担任管理人[EB/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/aqv3JdjwmsjMZCRDP950JQ, 2022-11-14. |
[4] | 邹海林. 新企业破产法与管理人中心主义[J]. 华东政法学院学报, 2006(6): 122. |
[5] | 江平. 公司法与级次债权理论[M]//赵旭东. 公司法评论(第1辑). 北京: 人民法院出版社2005: 3. |
[6] | 朱绚凌. 破产强制接管制度的构建与路径优化——以强化管理人履职保障为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2022(9): 119. |
[7] | 林恩伟. 我国破产管理人制度刍议——以管理人中心主义架构为视角[J]. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(2): 4. |
[8] | 李飞. 当代外国破产法[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2006: 733-734. |
[9] | 甘培忠, 赵文贵. 论破产法上债务人高管人员民事责任的追究[J]. 政法论坛, 2008(2): 117. |
[10] | 王佐发. 论困境公司董事信义义务的转化[J]. 社会科学, 2022(2): 128. |
[11] | 王欣新. 管理人制度的发展与创新[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2017(19): 18. |
[12] | 李曙光. 企业破产法新旧专题比较与案例应用[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2006: 496. |
[13] | 甘培忠, 赵文贵. 论破产法上债务人高管人员民事责任的追究[J]. 政法论坛, 2008(2): 118. |
[14] | 协会新闻|截至2022年6月30日全国各地破产管理人协会达200家[EB/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/yf2JsGwm8qgbo0cFvhq3Ug, 2022-11-15. |
[15] | 王欣新. 破产法修改中管理人制度的健全与完善[EB/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/uZtSbgJSN7BSd0rpnQCwEg, 2022-11-15. |
[16] | 李玉明. 破产管理人监督法律制度研究[J]. 法律制度建设, 2022(29): 124. |
[17] | 郭丹. 破产公司董事对债权人之个人民事赔偿责任[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2007, 22(1): 107-111. |
[18] | 王斐民. 破产管理人的定位与八大责任风险[EB/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/IvdgaaQMLYGiYUYzoFun9Q, 2022-11-18. |