|
父亲和母亲控制对寄宿和走读中学生手机依赖的影响:教师领导行为的调节作用
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨教师领导行为在父母控制与寄宿和走读中学生手机依赖之间的调节作用,为预防中学生手机依赖提供干预支持。方法:选取西部两市三所中学850人进行调查,使用父母教养方式量表、中学生手机依赖量表、教师领导行为问卷测量中学生父母控制、手机依赖和教师领导行为的得分高低。结果:父亲控制和母亲控制与手机依赖正相关(r = 0.24, p < 0.01; r = 0.24, p < 0.01),教师权威和放任领导行为对父亲控制与寄宿和走读生手机依赖之间的关系存在调节作用(β = 0.08, p < 0.05; β = 0.09, p < 0.01),教师放任领导行为对母亲控制与寄宿和走读生手机依赖之间的关系存在调节作用(β = 0.09, p < 0.01)。结论:父亲和母亲控制对青少年手机依赖的消极作用在寄宿生中影响更大,教师民主领导行为在父母控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中没有保护作用,教师权威在父亲控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中具有雪上加霜的消极作用,教师放任领导行为在父亲和母亲控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中具有雪上加霜的消极作用。
Objective: To explore the relationship between parental control, teacher leadership behavior and smartphone dependence of boarders and non-boarding adolescents, and to provide intervention support for the prevention of smartphone dependence among middle school students. Methods: Three secondary schools in two western cities with 850 students were selected for the survey, and the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), the Mobile Phone Dependence Scale for middle school students, and the Teacher Leadership Behavior Questionnaire were used to measure the high and low scores of parental control, smartphone dependence, and teacher leadership behavior among secondary school students. Results: Father control and mother control were positively associated with smartphone dependence (r = 0.24, p < 0.01; r = 0.24, p < 0.01), teacher authoritative and permissive leadership behaviors moderated the relationship between father control and smartphone dependence among boarding and non-boarding adolescents (β = 0.08, p < 0.05; β = 0.09, p < 0.01), and there was a moderating effect of teacher permissive leadership behavior on the relationship between mother control and smartphone dependence among boarding and non-boarding adolescents (β = 0.09, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The negative effect of father and mother control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence was greater among boarders, teachers’ democratic leadership behavior had no protective effect in the effect of parental control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence, teachers’ authoritative leadership behavior had a negative effect in the effect of father control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence, and teachers’ permissive leadership behavior had a negative effect in the effect of father and mother control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence.
[1] | 邓兆杰, 黄海, 桂娅菲, 等(2015). 大学生手机依赖与父母教养方式、主观幸福感的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(1), 68-73. |
[2] | 范兴华, 陈京军, 陈功, 等(2007). 初中生知觉到的教师领导行为模式及其与心理健康的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 194-195. |
[3] | 黄海, 牛露颖, 周春燕, 等(2014). 手机依赖指数中文版在大学生中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(5), 835-838. |
[4] | 刘丹霓, 李董平(2017). 父母教养方式与青少年网络成瘾: 自我弹性的中介和调节作用检验. 心理科学, 40(6), 1385-1391. |
[5] | 刘庆奇, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 等(2017). 手机成瘾与青少年睡眠质量: 中介与调节作用分析. 心理学报, 49(12), 1524-1536. |
[6] | 刘长江, 郑日昌(2002). 教师领导行为与儿童同伴关系的研究. 心理发展与教育, (3), 29-33. |
[7] | 申子姣, 房超, 张锦涛, 等(2012). 父母行为心理控制与青少年网络成瘾的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(5), 652-655. |
[8] | 孙经, 何健, 张丁, 等(2015). 河南省住校与非住校中学生心理健康状况比较. 中国学校卫生, 36(3), 381-383. |
[9] | 王小辉(2011). 中学生手机依赖现状及与社会支持、社会适应性的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学. |
[10] | 吴武典, 陈秀蓉(1978). 教师领导行为与学生的期待, 学业成就及生活适应. 教育心理学报, 19(11), 87-104. |
[11] | 谢其利, 郑惠珍, 江光荣, 等(2021). 班主任协商管理行为、师生关系与小学4~6年级学生外化问题行为的相互作用关系: 交叉滞后研究. 心理学报, 53(10), 1120-1132. |
[12] | 杨红君, 楚艳民, 刘利, 等(2009). 父母养育方式量表(PBI)在中国大学生中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 434-436. |
[13] | 张承芬(2000). 教育心理学(pp. 225-226). 山东教育出版社. |
[14] | 中国互联网络信息中心(2021). 全国未成年人互联网使用研究报告. |
[15] | 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (6), 942-950. |
[16] | Bronfenbrener, U. (1977). Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531. |
[17] | https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513 |
[18] | Fleming, J., Greentree, S., & Cocotti-Muller, D. (2006). Safety in Cyberspace: Adolescents’ Safety and Exposure Online. Youth and Society, 38, 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X06287858 |
[19] | Hollister-Wagner, G. H., Foshee, V. A., & Jackson, C. (2001). Adolescent Aggression: Models of Resiliency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02050.x |
[20] | Jun, S. M. (2016). The Reciprocal Longitudinal Relationships between Mobile Phone Addiction and Depressive Symptoms among Korean Adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.061 |
[21] | Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among Smartphone Addiction, Stress, Academic Performance, and Satisfaction with Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045 |
[22] | Wang, S. T., & Mao, Y. Q. (2018). The Effect of Boarding on Campus on Left-Behind Children’s Sense of School Belonging and Academic Achievement: Chinese Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38, 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1470965 |
[23] | Zhang, R. P., Bai, B. Y., & Jiang, S. (2019). Parenting Styles and Internet Addiction in Chinese Adolescents: Conscientiousness as a Mediator and Teacher Support as a Moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 144-150. |
[24] | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.019 |