%0 Journal Article
%T 父亲和母亲控制对寄宿和走读中学生手机依赖的影响：教师领导行为的调节作用<br>The Effect of Parental Control on Smartphone Dependence among Boarding and Non-Boarding Middle School Students: The Moderating Effect of Teacher Leadership Behavior
%A 包强
%A 郑周义
%A 曲泽政
%J Advances in Psychology
%P 1030-1038
%@ 2160-7281
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AP.2023.133123
%X 目的：探讨教师领导行为在父母控制与寄宿和走读中学生手机依赖之间的调节作用，为预防中学生手机依赖提供干预支持。方法：选取西部两市三所中学850人进行调查，使用父母教养方式量表、中学生手机依赖量表、教师领导行为问卷测量中学生父母控制、手机依赖和教师领导行为的得分高低。结果：父亲控制和母亲控制与手机依赖正相关(r = 0.24, p &lt; 0.01; r = 0.24, p &lt; 0.01)，教师权威和放任领导行为对父亲控制与寄宿和走读生手机依赖之间的关系存在调节作用(β = 0.08, p &lt; 0.05; β = 0.09, p &lt; 0.01)，教师放任领导行为对母亲控制与寄宿和走读生手机依赖之间的关系存在调节作用(β = 0.09, p &lt; 0.01)。结论：父亲和母亲控制对青少年手机依赖的消极作用在寄宿生中影响更大，教师民主领导行为在父母控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中没有保护作用，教师权威在父亲控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中具有雪上加霜的消极作用，教师放任领导行为在父亲和母亲控制对青少年手机依赖的影响中具有雪上加霜的消极作用。<br />
Objective: To explore the relationship between parental control, teacher leadership behavior and smartphone dependence of boarders and non-boarding adolescents, and to provide intervention support for the prevention of smartphone dependence among middle school students. Methods: Three secondary schools in two western cities with 850 students were selected for the survey, and the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), the Mobile Phone Dependence Scale for middle school students, and the Teacher Leadership Behavior Questionnaire were used to measure the high and low scores of parental control, smartphone dependence, and teacher leadership behavior among secondary school students. Results: Father control and mother control were positively associated with smartphone dependence (r = 0.24, p &lt; 0.01; r = 0.24, p &lt; 0.01), teacher authoritative and permissive leadership behaviors moderated the relationship between father control and smartphone dependence among boarding and non-boarding adolescents (β = 0.08, p &lt; 0.05; β = 0.09, p &lt; 0.01), and there was a moderating effect of teacher permissive leadership behavior on the relationship between mother control and smartphone dependence among boarding and non-boarding adolescents (β = 0.09, p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: The negative effect of father and mother control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence was greater among boarders, teachers’ democratic leadership behavior had no protective effect in the effect of parental control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence, teachers’ authoritative leadership behavior had a negative effect in the effect of father control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence, and teachers’ permissive leadership behavior had a negative effect in the effect of father and mother control on adolescents’ smartphone dependence.
%K 父母控制，手机依赖，教师领导行为，寄宿和走读中学生<br>Parental Control
%K Smartphone Dependence
%K Teacher Leadership Behavior
%K Boarding and Non-Boarding Middle School Students
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=63070