全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

高校教育纠纷仲裁制度探究
Research on the Arbitration System of Education Disputes in Colleges and Universities

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.112079, PP. 548-555

Keywords: 高校教育纠纷,师生权益,仲裁制度,解纷机制
College Education Disputes
, Rights and Interests of Teachers and Students, Arbitration System, Dispute Settlement Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目前,我国解决高校教育纠纷的校内申诉、行政复议、司法诉讼等几种主要方式解纷效果不理想。根据高校教育纠纷的特殊性和复杂性等特点可以构建高校教育纠纷仲裁制度,其从可行性看已具备一定的法律基础、理论基础与实践基础。高校教育纠纷仲裁制度的构建应从仲裁机构设置入手,并对受案范围、举证责任、运行程序及裁决效力作出明确规定。
At present, there are several main methods for resolving educational disputes in colleges and universities, such as intra-campus appeals, administrative reconsideration, and judicial proceedings. According to the particularity and complexity of college education disputes, the arbitration system of college education disputes can be constructed, which has a certain legal basis, theoretical basis and practical basis from the point of view of feasibility. The construction of the arbitration system for educational disputes in colleges and universities should start with the establishment of arbitration institutions, and make clear provisions on the scope of accepting cases, the burden of proof, operating procedures and the effectiveness of rulings.

References

[1]  程雁雷, 蒋艳. 论我国高等教育法律救济制度的优化[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2021, 20(6): 22-29.
[2]  张弛. 高校管理侵权与学生权益救济机制的现实考察——基于1441份问卷的实证分析[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2018, 16(3): 31-37.
[3]  湛中乐, 王春蕾. 于艳茹诉北京大学案的法律评析[J]. 行政法学研究, 2016, 97(3): 97-107.
[4]  张朴田. “非升即走”制度在高校聘用合同中的效力认定——以郭某诉江南大学人事争议案为例[J]. 法律适用(司法案例), 2018(10): 41-46.
[5]  李德龙, 主编. 简明教育法学教程[M]. 辽宁: 辽宁大学出版社, 2010: 160-162.
[6]  陆在春. 我国教育仲裁制度的重构与完善[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2009, 37(2): 164-168.
[7]  陆波. 构建新型的高校教师权利救济机制——教育仲裁[J]. 常熟理工学院学报, 2010, 24(6): 44-47.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133