|
Dispute Settlement 2022
共犯关系脱离研究
|
Abstract:
共犯关系脱离探究的是危害结果的责任归属问题,旨在解决脱离者为何不对最终既遂结果承担责任,它与犯罪中止分属于不同的理论。因果关系切断说的合理性来源于因果共犯论,而其标准过高的缺点可以用共谋射程理论来弥补。要想成功从共犯关系中脱离,从脱离者的角度看,需要切断原本物理性以及心理性的因果联系,从剩余共犯的角度看,需基于新的共谋继续完成犯罪。所有判断的落脚点均在于原本既存的共犯关系是否已经不复存在。
The question of attribution of responsi-bility for harming the outcome of the offense is explored in the case of the separation of the offender, which is a different theory from the suspension of the crime. The rationality of the causal severance theory comes from the theory of causal complicity, and its disadvantage of too high a standard can be compensated for by the conspiracy range theory. In order to successfully break away from the accomplice relationship, from the perspective of the detached, it is necessary to cut off the original physical and psychological causal links, and from the perspective of the remaining accomplices, it is necessary to continue to complete the crime based on new complicity. The point of all judgments is whether the original accomplice relationship no longer exists.
[1] | [日]大塚仁. 刑法概说(总论) [M]. 冯军, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009: 295, 341. |
[2] | [日]大谷实. 刑法总论[M]. 黎宏, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 349. |
[3] | [日]松原芳博. 刑法总论重要问题[M]. 王昭武, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2014: 325. |
[4] | 刘艳红. 共犯脱离判断基准: 规范的因果关系遮断说[J]. 中外法学, 2013(4): 747-765. |
[5] | 王昭武. 共谋射程理论与共犯关系脱离的认定——兼与刘艳红教授商榷[J]. 法律科学, 2016(1): 58-71. |
[6] | [日]西田典之. 日本刑法总论[M]. 第2版. 王昭武, 刘明祥, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 332-337. |
[7] | [日]山口厚. 刑法总论[M]. 付立庆, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 373. |
[8] | 李冠煜. 共同正犯脱离的中国经验及其教义学反思[J]. 政治与法律, 2021(11): 116-134. |
[9] | 王昭武. 我国“共犯关系的脱离”研究述评[M]//赵秉志, 主编. 刑法论丛(第12卷). 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 130-148. |
[10] | 付晓雅, 高铭暄. 论共犯关系脱离的具体认定与法律责任[J]. 法律科学, 2016(1): 49-57. |
[11] | 赵慧. 论共犯关系的脱离[J]. 法学评论, 2003(5): 55-61. |
[12] | 于润芝. 共同正犯脱离的标准: 基于“心理因果联系”的功能重析[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(5): 88-97. |