|
|
小学生元认知发展与促进的研究综述
|
Abstract:
元认知在小学生日常学习和生活中起重要作用。系列研究表明，小学阶段儿童的元认知发展迅速，元认知干预可以有效提高他们的学业成绩。本文将从小学生元认知的测试工具、发展特点、影响作用以及干预措施四个方面对国内外研究进行综述，旨为小学教学活动的优化和该领域的未来研究提供思路。
Metacognition plays an important role in pupils’ daily life. A series of studies have shown that pupils’ metacognition develops rapidly, and metacognitive intervention can effectively improve their academic performance. This paper will review the related research from four aspects: test tools, developmental characteristics, influence, and intervention, aiming to provide ideas for the optimization of primary school teaching activities and future research in this field.
| [1] | 陈英和, 韩瑽瑽(2012). 儿童青少年元认知的发展特点及作用的心理机制. 心理科学, 35(3), 537-543. |
| [2] | 丁晓梅, 马伟娜(2017). 元认知和自我效能感训练对提高小学生数学成绩作用的研究. 杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 16(5), 464-469. |
| [3] | 董奇(1989). 论元认知. 北京师范大学学报, (1), 68-74. |
| [4] | 郭成(2004). 元认知训练对小学生数学问题解题能力的影响. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 29(1), 128-133. |
| [5] | 郝嘉佳, 陈英和(2010). 小学儿童在线和离线元认知监控的发展特点及其对问题解决的影响. 心理科学, 33(5), 1108-1112. |
| [6] | 郝嘉佳, 齐琳, 陈英和(2011). 小学六年级数学困难儿童的元认知特点及其在应用题解决中的表现. 中国特殊教育, (2), 52-57. |
| [7] | 林崇德, 沃建中(1999). 7~11岁儿童自我监控能力的发展及对认知操作的影响. 心理发展与教育, (4), 1-7. |
| [8] | 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟(2019). 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展: 一年纵向考察. 心理发展与教育, 35(4), 439-446. |
| [9] | 马永霞(2014). 元认知理论在小学作文教学中的应用. 硕士学位论文, 海口: 海南师范大学. |
| [10] | 乔丽影(2019). 小学高年级学生英语听力学习策略运用现状调查. 硕士学位论文, 延吉: 延边大学. |
| [11] | 师保国(2002). 元认知训练方法研究述评. 西南师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 28(4), 39-43. |
| [12] | 司继伟, 张庆林(1999). 自我监控策略的培养. 学科教育, (2), 48-50. |
| [13] | 孙景华(2012). 3~5年级小学生语文阅读元认知的特点及干预. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学. |
| [14] | 孙丽芳, 张雅明(2010). 小学高年级儿童元认知发展特点及干预. 教学研究, 33(6), 76-81. |
| [15] | 汪玲, 郭德俊, 方平(2005). 元认知训练的动机增强效应. 心理科学, 28(4), 881-884. |
| [16] | 王治国, 陈英和(2007). 阅读材料类型和难度对五年级儿童阅读策略的影响. 心理科学, 30(6), 1367-1371. |
| [17] | 谢双成(1995). 元认知与作文教学. 沈阳师范学院学报(社会科学版), (4), 76-79. |
| [18] | 张庆林, 管鹏(1997). 小学生表征应用题的元认知分析. 心理发展与教育, (3), 13-16. |
| [19] | 张雅明, 俞国良(2005). 《儿童元认知问卷》的编制与修订. 应用心理学, 11(3), 241-246. |
| [20] | 钟声云(2018). 深圳城中村中高年级小学生元认知特点及元认知训练研究. 硕士学位论文, 深圳: 深圳大学. |
| [21] | Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: Theory or Chapter Heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 391-402. |
| [22] | https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90025-4 |
| [23] | Brown, A. L. (1982). Learning, Remembering, and Understanding. Cognitive Development, 4, 125-126. |
| [24] | Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65-116). L. Erlbaum Associates. |
| [25] | Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400505 |
| [26] | Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 232-286). Erlbaum. |
| [27] | Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). The Neural Basis of Metacognitive Ability. Springer. |
| [28] | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_11 |
| [29] | Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Swanson, L. (2003). Students with Learning Disabilities and the Process of Writing: A Meta-Analysis of SRSD Studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (pp. 323-344). Guilford. |
| [30] | Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 125-173). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5 |
| [31] | Osaka, M., Komori, M., Morishita, M., & Osaka, N. (2007). Neural Bases of Focusing Attention in Working Memory: An fMRI Study Based on Group Differences. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 130. |
| [32] | https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.2.130 |
| [33] | Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 121-122. |
| [34] | https://doi.org/10.5070/L411004984 |
| [35] | Rosenzweig, C., Krawec, J., & Montague, M. (2011). Metacognitive Strategy Use of Eighth Grade Students with and without Learning Disabilities during Mathematical Problem Solving: A Think Aloud Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410378445 |
| [36] | Shipman, S., & Shipman, V. C. (1985). Cognitive Styles: Some Conceptual, Methodological, and Applied Issues. Review of Research in Education, 12, 229-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167151 |
| [37] | Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive Differences between Skilled and Less Skilled Readers: Remediating Deficits through Story Grammar and Attribution Training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225-235. |
| [38] | https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.225 |
| [39] | Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1091 |
| [40] | Usó-Juan, E., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2006). Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills (pp. 79-102). M. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197778 |
