全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Surviving a Calculus Class during the Pandemic: Affordances and Constraints of a Fully Modular Instruction Class

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2023.141004, PP. 29-40

Keywords: Flexible Learning System, Bichronous Class, Self-Learning Modules, Modular Instruction

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The suspension of in person classes due to the global health pandemic caused by COVID-19 led to abrupt changes in the mode of instruction delivery and assessment. This action research using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model explored the opportunities and challenges in a Differential Calculus (DC) class on a fully online modular form of instruction (MFI). Using an approved syllabus and available online and offline resources, self-learning modules (SLMs) on DC were developed and the students’ views and experiences on the use of the SLMs during synchronous and asynchronous classes were determined. Survey questionnaires, reflective journals, and focus group discussion (FGD) were utilized for data gathering. Using descriptive and thematic analysis, the results revealed that students welcomed the use of online modular instruction because of accessibility and flexibility. They experienced independent learning, had better understanding of their own learning, appreciated calculus better, and were inspired to do their best. However, they experienced challenges in reading the modules and had difficulty understanding some lessons, thus, the need for group studies was evident. The modular form of instruction provided the learners with positive learning experiences leading to opportunities for self-regulated learning and collaboration yet gave challenges in reading literacy.

References

[1]  Ahmed, A. (2019). Students’ Reflective Journaling: An Impactful Strategy That Informs Instructional Practices in an EFL Writing University Context in Qatar. Reflective Practice, 20, 483-500.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1638246
[2]  Annink, A. (2016). Using the Research Journal during Qualitative Data Collection in a Cross-Cultural Context. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7, Article ID: 20150063.
https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0063
[3]  Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why Action Research? Action Research, 1, 9-28.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
[4]  Carlson, M. P., Madison, B., & West, R. D. (2015). A Study of Students’ Readiness to Learn Calculus. The International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1, 209-233.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0013-y
[5]  Dejene, W., & Chen, D. (2019). The Practice of Modularized Curriculum in Higher Education Institution: Active Learning and Continuous Assessment in Focus. Cogent Education, 6, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052
[6]  Domingo, L. M. S. (2019). Writing and Mathematics Acquisition: Can They Be Allies? Cavite State University Research Journal, 38-49.
[7]  Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 733554.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
[8]  Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O. et al. (2020). Students’ Perceptions on Distance Education: A Multinational Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article No. 18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
[9]  Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. (1972). Modular Instruction in Higher Education: A Review.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED061158
[10]  Hine, G. (2013). The Importance of Action Research in Teacher Education Programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23, 151-163.
https://www.iier.org.au/iier23/hine.pdf
[11]  Holter, A. C., & Frabutt, J. M. (2012). Mission Driven and Data Informed Leadership. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 15, 253-269.
http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/catholic/article/view/1935/1753
https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1502082013
[12]  Joan, R. (2013). Flexible Learning as New Learning Design in Classroom Process to Promote Quality Education. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 9, 37-42.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1098325.pdf
https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.1.2401
[13]  Laal, M., Laal, M., & Kermanshahi, Z. (2012). 21st Century Learning; Learning in Collaboration. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1696-1701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.885
[14]  Magnuson, S., Kras, K. R., Aleandro, H., Rudes, D. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2019). Using Plan-Do-Study-Act and Participatory Action Research to Improve Use of Risk Needs Assessment. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 5, 44-63.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1555442
[15]  Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020). Bichronous Online Learning: Blending Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Learning.
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
[16]  Mateo, J. (2021, May 23). CHED: Flexible Learning to Stay Even after Pandemic. Philippine Star Global.
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2021/05/23/2100234/ched-flexible-learning-stay-even-after-pandemic
[17]  Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (2009). Surveys and Questionnaires. National Institute for Health Research.
https://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/12_Surveys_and_Questionnaires_Revision_2009.pdf
[18]  Naidu, S. (2017). How Flexible Is Flexible Learning, Who Is to Decide and What Are Its Implications? Distance Education, 38, 269-272.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1371831
[19]  Nardo, M. T. (2017). Modular Instruction Enhances Learner Autonomy. American Journal of Education Research, 5, 1024-1034.
[20]  OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Reading Framework. In PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework (p. 28). OECD Publishing.
[21]  Rakova, E., Ibyatova, L., & Oparina, K. (2018). Modular Approach to Teaching and Learning English Grammar in Technical Universities. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 139-148). Society Integration Education.
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3229
[22]  Sadiq, S., & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching at University Level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 103-109.
[23]  Scheelbeek, P. F. D., Hamza, Y. A., Schellenberg, J., & Hill, Z. (2020). Improving the Use of Focus Group Discussions in Low Income Settings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20, 287.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01168-8
[24]  Shuy, T. (2010). TEAL Center Fact Sheet No. 3: Self-Regulated Learning.
https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/3_TEAL_Self%20Reg%20Learning.pdf
[25]  Tohidi, S., KarimiMoonagi, H., Shayan, A., & Ahmadinia, H. (2019). The Effect of Self-Learning Module on Nursing Students’ Clinical Competency: A Pilot Study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 24, 91-95.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_46_17
[26]  World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report-52.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133