A lutetium 177 (177Lu)
radiopharmaceutical has been used as a theragnostic agent in molecular radiotherapies. This study aimed to
produce images simulating those obtained in a total body imaging study with hot
lesions to assess and investigate the image quality of the Hawkeye SPECT/CT
images from Lu-177. The NEMA image quality phantom (PTW) with spheres (inner
diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28 and 37 mm) and lung insert was used. The measured volume in the background of the current phantom setting was
9482 mL. The five smaller spheres were filled with an activity concentration of 0.461 MBq/mL and the biggest
sphere was filled with water. The phantom was placed on the couch and scanned at four hot
sphere-to-background concentrations, which are no background, 16:1, 8:1 and 4:1. The images
obtained from the scans were imported onto the OXIRIS image analysis tool.
Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on each sphere of the reconstructed SPECT
image. Image contrast and background
variability ratios for hot spheres were used as measures of image quality. In
addition, the accuracy of corrections were determined from the uniform
background and cold lung insert regions. The 37 mm cold sphere had the highest
percent contrast, whiles the 10 mm hot sphere had the least for the
various hot sphere to background ratios. The background variability for each
hot sphere was also determined. The average lung residual error was calculated
to be 23.13% for the 16:1 and 22.57% for both the 8:1 and 4:1 hot sphere to
background ratio. The results show that the scanner has very good overall
performance.
References
[1]
Ljunngberg, M., Celler, A., Konijnenberg, M.W., Eckerman, K.F., Dewaraja, Y.K. and Sjögreen-Gleisner, K. (2016) MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quantitative 177Lu SPECT Applied for Dosimetry of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 57, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.159012
[2]
He, B. and Frey, E.C. (2006) Comparison of Conventional, Model-Based Quantitative Planar, and Quantitative SPECT Image Processing Methods for Organ Activity Estimation Using In-111 Agents. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, 2967-3981. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/16/006
[3]
Zhao, W., et al. (2018) Determination of Gamma Camera Calibration Factor for Quantification of Therapeutic Radioisotopes. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Physics, 5, Article No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0208-9
[4]
Zaidi, H., Ojha, N., Morich, M., Griesmer, J., Hu, Z., Maniawski, P., et al. (2011) Design and Performance Evaluation of a Whole-Body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI System. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 56, 3091-3106. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013
[5]
Delso, G., Fürst, S., Jakoby, B., Ladebeck, R., Ganter, C., Nekolla, S.G., et al. (2011) Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52, 1914-1922. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.092726
[6]
Drzezga, A., Souvatzoglou, M., Eiber, M., Beer, A.J., Fürst, S., Martinez-Möller, A., et al. (2012) First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 53, 845-855. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.098608
[7]
Wiesmüller, M., Quick, H.H., Navalpakkam, B., Lell, M.M., Uder, M., Ritt, P., et al. (2013) Comparison of Lesion Detection and Quantitation of Tracer Uptake Between PET from a Simultaneously Acquiring Whole-Body PET/MR Hybrid Scanner and PET from PET/CT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 40, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2249-y
[8]
Paulus, D.H., Tellmann, L. and Quick, H.H. (2013) Towards Improved Hardware Component Attenuation Correction in PET/MR Hybrid Imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58, 8021-8040. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/8021
[9]
Kartmann, R., Paulus, D.H., Braun, H., Aklan, B., Ziegler, S., Navalpakkam, B.K., et al. (2013) Integrated PET/MR Imaging: Automatic Attenuation Correction of Flexible RF Coils. Medical Physics, 40, Article ID: 082301. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4812685
[10]
Paulus, D.H., Thorwath, D., Schmidt, H. and Quick, H.H. (2014) Towards Integration of PET/MR Hybrid Imaging into Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning. Medical Physics. 41, Article ID: 072505. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4881317
[11]
Oehmigen, M., Ziegler, S., Jakoby, B.W., Georgi, J.C., Paulus, D.H. and Quick, H.H. (2014) Radiotracer Dose Reduction in Integrated PET/MR: Implications from National Electrical Manufacturers Association Phantom Studies. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 55, 1361-1367. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.139147
[12]
Delso, G., Martinez-Möller, A., Bundschuh, R.A., Ladebeck, R., Candidus, Y., Faul, D. and Ziegler, S.I. (2010) Evaluation of the Attenuation Properties of MR Equipment for its Use in a Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 55, 4361-4374. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/15/011