道术之辩：论萨义德与亨廷顿的学说在张承志创作中的在场
Practice of Tao and Shu: The Presence of Edward Waefie Said’s and Samuel P. Huntington’s Theory in Zhang Chengzhi’s Writings

萨义德的后殖民理论与亨廷顿的文化冲突论是对后殖民时期世界诸文明间关系的不同理解。张承志的写作在对“重写”世界史、重建文明自信、推动文明共存的理智追求，与基于东西二元对立思维与文化冲突话语的情感性言说之间来回游移，萨义德与亨廷顿的学说复杂地纠缠其中，却暗合着中国古典哲学中“道术之辩”的逻辑关系。张承志的创作显示了中国后殖民文学在新阶段的实绩，其内容及言说困境对于全面理解当下中国知识分子的思想现状以及第三世界的后殖民经验有着重要意义。
Said’s post-colonial theory and Huntington’s cultural conflict theory are different understandings of the relationship between civilizations in the post-colonial world. Zhang Chengzhi’s related expositions are moving back and forth between the intellectual pursuit of “rewriting” world history, rebuilding confidence in civilization, and promoting the coexistence of civilizations, and emotional speech based on the dualistic thinking of the East and the West and the discourse of cultural conflict. Said’s and Huntington’s theory complicatedly tangles in it, but is in line with the logical relationship of “Dao” and “Shu” in Chinese classical philosophy. Zhang Chengzhi’s writings show the actual achievements of Chinese post-colonial literature in Neo-Era literature. Its content and the linguistic dilemma it faces are of great significance for a comprehensive understanding of the current ideological status of Chinese intellectuals and the post-colonial experience of the Third World.