全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Checklists in Material Selection: Developing Criteria for ESL Learners at University in Sri Lanka

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2022.123023, PP. 294-312

Keywords: Checklists, English as a Second Language, Validity, Reliability, Authentic Materials, Contextualization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Instructional materials are a very significant aspect of the learning-teaching process, and in the field of foreign language learning, it is generally known that students learn well when they are enthusiastically engaged with the material. In order to make the learning process successful for the many stakeholders, a checklist approach has been developed. This provides a set of standards for the selection of instructional materials that ensure greater quality and consistency of the material to be exploited in the classroom. In this study, an attempt is made to design a checklist for selecting course materials for compulsory English as a Second Language course for all first-year undergraduates in a state university in Sri Lanka. This is to pinpoint a sustainable method for developing teaching materials that might be beneficial for many English as a foreign language programmes since checklists are expected to provide material developers with design guidelines on which course materials can be prepared. This study comprised three main phases: the exploration of existing checklists, the design of a tentative checklist based on the comments received via a questionnaire administered to the sample and lastly, a review of the developed checklist by the sample. The participants were intentionally sampled from the most senior members of the staff at the English Language Teaching Unit of the University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka, with more than fifteen years of experience in teaching English as a foreign language at university. With the expert views of the participants, the tentative checklist was revised. The final verified checklist ensures validity, reliability, and teacher satisfaction for the material selection process and can be used as a professional selection tool when developing instructional materials. The findings report that the top teacher-preferred criteria focused on relevance and authenticity of the content, contextualization of grammar structures, and importantly, accommodating different proficiency levels with comprehensive and communicative tasks. It is concluded that teaching materials immensely contribute to English as a foreign language learners’ progression, to the professional development of material designers, and to the success of English as a foreign language programmes in general.

References

[1]  Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal Characteristics of EFL/ESL Textbooks: A Step towards Systematic Textbook Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8, Vol. VIII, No. 2.
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ansary-Textbooks/
[2]  Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Heinemann.
[3]  Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
[4]  Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative Motivation and Second Language Acquisition. In Z. Dornyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (1-20). Honolulu Publishing Company Ltd.
[5]  McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
[6]  Miekley, J. (2007). ESL Textbook Evaluation Checklist. The Reading Matrix, 5, 9-17.
[7]  Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi, R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Developing an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist: A Focus Group Study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 100-106.
[8]  Mukundan, J. (2007). Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 1128-1134.
[9]  Qian, D. D. (1996). ESL Vocabulary Acquisition: Contextualization and Decontextualization. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 120-142.
[10]  Richards, J. C. (1998) Beyond Training: Perspectives on Language Teacher Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[11]  Rea-Dickens, P., & Germaine, K. (1994). Evaluation. Oxford University Press.
[12]  Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbook and Materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237-246.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
[13]  Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook Selection and Evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 432-453). Heinle & Heinle.
[14]  Soori, A., Kafipour, R., & Soury, M. (2011). EFL Textbook Evaluation and Graphic Representation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 26, 481-493.
[15]  Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Continuum.
[16]  Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice & Theory. Cambridge University Press.
[17]  Williams, D. (1983). Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation. ELT Journal, 37, 251-255.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/37.3.251
[18]  Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman Publications.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133