全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Effect of Provided Education Services on Meeting Residents’ Satisfaction in the United Arab Emirates, the Case of Ajman Emirate

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2022.134093, PP. 1511-1528

Keywords: Ajman Emirate, UAE, Education, Service Quality, Satisfaction, Dimensions

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The UAE is an emerging mature education market in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, ambitiously looking forward to being an attractive destination for?education’s investors, education’s providers, and regional and international students. But this depends largely on the quality of the education services provided and the residents’ level of satisfaction. The purpose of this paper is to identify the level of Ajman’s resident satisfaction on education services and to assess what do the trends over time, tell about the education quality, and residents’ level of satisfaction? To this end, a sample of 992 was selected out of a total of 95,531 household who lived in Ajman and had prior experience in education provided services. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 and AMOS version 22. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis showed an acceptable model fit used to measure residents’ satisfaction both for government and private sector. Findings for Ajman showed that all dimensions of accessibility, reliability, and safety, except for responsiveness dimension of education service in government sector, correlated positively with education service quality, which also had a strong, positive correlation with residents’ satisfaction. For private sector, all of accessibility, reliability, safety and responsiveness dimensions correlated positively with education service quality, which also had a strong positive correlation with residents’ satisfaction. Generally, about 93% of Ajman residents claimed that they were satisfied with education services, where satisfaction level on education services provided by the government sector reached 94% and about 92% in the private sector. Both government and private education had the same highest scoring dimensions, with safety dimension had the highest satisfaction of about 97% for government sector and 96% for private sector. Responsiveness dimension satisfaction was the least with 92% for government sector and quality dimension in private sector was the least with 87%. Findings of this study were expected to support the concerned decision makers for improving education services within the Emirate of Ajman. The UAE being among the top destinations for FDI in the region enhanced this trend, by recently introducing ownership laws to allow for 100% foreign investors ownership of companies outside free zones, together with 10-year residency visa options—a

References

[1]  Alhebsi, A., Pettaway, L. D., & Waller, L. (2015). A History of Education in the United Arab Emirates and Trucial Sheikdoms. The Global eLearning Journal, 4, 1-6.
[2]  Bush, T. (2007). Educational Leadership and Management: Theory, Policy, and Practice. South African Journal of Education, 27, 391-406.
[3]  Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
[4]  Dhanusha, G. (2018). Khaleej Times.
https://dhanusha.me/
[5]  Duque, L. C., & Weeks, J. R. (2010). Towards a Model and Methodology for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction. Quality Assurance in Education, 18, 84-105.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011035321
[6]  Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24, 197-209.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
[7]  Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research. Management Science, 52, 1865-1883.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
[8]  Richardson, J. (2005). Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 387-415.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099193
[9]  Ross, K., & Genevois, J. (2006). Cross-National Studies of Quality of Education: Planning Their Design and Managing Their Impact. International Institute for Educational Planning.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495399.pdf
[10]  Salisbury, W., Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Newsted, P. R. (1997). Research Report: Better Theory through Measurement—Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation. Information Systems Research, 13, 91-103.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220079758_Research_Report_Better_Theory_Through_Measurement-Developing_a_Scale_to_Capture_Consensus_on_Appro
[11]  Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2777694
[12]  Steedman, H. (1996). Measuring the Quality of Educational Outputs: A Note. CEPDP (302). Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20662/
[13]  Toremen, F. et al. (2009). Total Quality Management Practices in Turkish Primary Schools. Quality Assurance in Education, 17, 30-44.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910929917

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133