The discussion section is considered as a crucial part in the writing process of a research article (RA). Research writers find it difficult to write an effective discussion for their results and this could be due to the unawareness of the various move functions that shape this section. A rhetorical move is a sentence or group of sentences that serves a communicative function. This paper focuses on move Background information, its linguistic devices such as verb, tense, and self-reference and lexical bundles (LBs) including 3- to 5-word bundles that are used to construct this communicative move. The corpus of the study includes a total of 50 medical RAs discussion section which were selected from five prestigious journals in the field. The corpus was analysed in terms of the occurrence of move Background information, the linguistic devices associated with this move and the LBs that initiate it. The analysis of the move and the linguistic realizations was done manually and the identification of LBs was done using AntConc3.5.7w computer program. The findings revealed that 34 (64%) of the corpus included move Background information. This move was mainly employed to describe methodological aspects and restate the research purpose. These functions were characterized by the use of procedural verbs, first-person plural pronouns and simple past tense. Moreover, several 3 - 5 words LBs (e.g., we tested the hypothesis, this study was based on) were found to initiate move Background information. Further studies are needed to examine other obligatory and optional moves such as Explaining research findings and Indicating research limitations.
References
[1]
Abdollahpour, Z., & Gholami, J. (2019). Embodiment of Rhetorical Moves in Lexical Bundles in Abstracts of the Medical Sciences. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 37, 339-360.
[2]
Alamri, B. M. (2017). Connecting Genre-Based and Corpus-Driven Approaches in Research Articles: A Comparative Study of Moves and Lexical Bundles in Saudi and International Journals. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New Mexico. http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educlls_etds/81
[3]
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. (2020). What, Which and Where: Examining self-Mention Markers in ISI and Iraqi Local Research Articles in Applied Linguistics. Asian Englishes, 22, 20-34.
[4]
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. J., Tan, H., Abdullah, A. N., Nimehchisalem, V., & Imm, L. G. (2019). Moving in the Right Direction in the Discussion Section of Research Articles. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 6, 459-473.
[5]
Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of the Discussion Sections of Applied Linguistics Research Articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4, 39-63.
[6]
Amnuai, W. (2017). The Textual Organization of the Discussion Sections of Accounting Research Articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40, 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.007
[7]
Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realizations in Accounting Research Article Abstracts Published in International and Thai-Based Journals. SAGE Open, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384
[8]
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2012). Investigating Move Structure of English Applied Linguistics Research Article Discussions Published in International and Thai Journals. English Language Teaching, 6, 1-13.
[9]
Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal Complexity in Academic Writing: A Comparison of Abstracts Written by Graduate Students and Expert Writers in Applied Linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008
[10]
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Adnan, Z. (2020a). The Argument Style in Research Article Discussions to Support Research Findings in Language Studies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7, 290-307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626
[11]
Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., Ramadhan, S., & Lubis, A. A. (2020b). The Argument Style of Research Article Discussions by Non-Native Authors of English Published in International Journals. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature (JOALL), 5, 193-212.
[12]
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on Results in Published Research Articles and Masters Dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001
[13]
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A Genre-Based Investigation of Discussion Sections of Research Articles in Dentistry and Disciplinary Variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
[14]
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: A&C Black.
[15]
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical Bundles in University Spoken and Written Registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
[16]
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If You Look at ...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371
[17]
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Disciplinary Writing: Examples from History and Biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
[18]
Cortes, V. (2013). The Purpose of This Study Is to: Connecting Lexical Bundles and Moves in Research Article Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
[19]
Davis, R. H. (2015). A Genre Analysis of Medical Research Articles. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Glasgow. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6724/
[20]
Dobakhti, L. (2016). A Genre Analysis of Discussion Sections of Qualitative Research Articles in Applied Linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, 1383-1389. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.08
[21]
Doró, K. (2013). Selling Their Research: The Linguistic Realization of Rhetoric Moves in English Thesis Abstracts Written by Hungarian Undergraduates. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 10, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjes-2013-0016
[22]
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Variations in the Discourse Patterns Favoured by Different Disciplines and Their Pedagogical Implications. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Listening: Research Perspectives (pp. 146-158). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524612.012
[23]
Dujsik, D. (2015). A Genre Analysis of Research Article Discussions in Applied Linguistics.Language Research 49, 453-477.
[24]
Fryer, D. L. (2007). Multidimensional Genre-Based Discourse Analysis of a Corpus of English-Language Medical Research Articles. Master Thesis, University of Oslo. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/25523/2
[25]
Fryer, D. L. (2012). Analysis of the Generic Discourse Features of the English-Language Medical Research Article: A Systemic-Functional Approach. Functions of Language, 19, 5-37. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.19.1.01fry
[26]
Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. (2015). Pedagogical Application of Specialized Corpora in ESP Teaching: The Case of the UVaSTECorpus. Scripta Manent, 3, 68-81.
[27]
Hashemi, M. R., & Moghaddam, I. G. (2016). A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articles in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13, 242-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674626
[28]
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre Analysis, and the Social Sciences: An Investigation of the Structure of Research Article Discussion Sections in Three Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
[29]
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A Genre-Based Investigation of the Discussion Sections in Articles and Dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
[30]
Huang, D. (2014). Genre Analysis of Moves in Medical Research Articles. Stylus, 5, 7-17.
[31]
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
[32]
Hyland, K. (2008). As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
[33]
Hyland, K. (2011). Looking though Corpora into Writing Practices. In V. Viana, S. Zyngier, & G. Barnbrook (Eds.), Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics (pp. 99-114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.48.07hyl
[34]
Jalali, Z. S., & Moini, M. R. (2018). A Corpus-Based Study of Lexical Bundles in Discussion Section of Medical Research Articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 10, 95-124.
[35]
Jalali, Z. S., Moini, M. R., & Arani, M. A. (2014). Structural and Functional Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Medical Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 13, 51-69.
[36]
Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A., & Namdari, N. (2012). A Comparative Study of Research Article Discussion Sections of Local and International Applied Linguistic Journals. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9, 1-29.
[37]
Jin, B. (2018). Rhetorical Differences in Research Article Discussion Sections of High- and Low-Impact Articles in the Field of Chemical Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2747358
[38]
Joseph, R., & Lim, J. M. H. (2018). Background Information in the Discussion Sections of Forestry Journals: A Case Study. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18, 198-216.
[39]
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
[40]
Khansari, D. (2016). Comparison of Rhetorical Moves in Research Articles and Abstracts in Soft and Hard Disciplines. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/57980/
[41]
Li, L. J., & Ge, G. C. (2009). Genre Analysis: Structural and Linguistic Evolution of the English-Medium Medical Research Article (1985-2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.004
[42]
Li, L., Franken, M., & Wu, S. (2020). Bundle-Driven Move Analysis: Sentence Initial lexical Bundles in PhD Abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.006
[43]
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The Schematic Structure of Discussion Sections in Applied Linguistics and the Distribution of Metadiscourse Markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.002
[44]
Lubis, A. H. (2019). The Argumentation Structure of Research Article Findings and Discussion Sections Written by Non-Native English Speaker Novice Writers: A Case of Indonesian Undergraduate Students. Asian Englishes, 22, 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669300
[45]
MacDonald, S. P. (1992). A Method for Analyzing Sentence-Level Differences in Disciplinary Knowledge Making. Written Communication, 9, 533-569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088392009004004
[46]
Mbodj-Diop, N. B. (2016). Lexical Bundles in Medical Research Articles: Structures and Functions. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/az.php
[47]
Moyetta, D. (2016). The Discussion Section of English and Spanish Research Articles in Psychology: A Contrastive Study. ESP Today-Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 4, 87-106.
[48]
Neely, E., & Cortes, V. (2009). A Little Bit About: Analyzing and Teaching Lexical Bundles in Academic Lectures. Language Value, 1, 17-38.
[49]
Nodoushan, M. (2012). A Structural Move Analysis of Discussion Sub-Genre in Applied Linguistics. In International Conference on Languages, E-Learning and Romanian Studies (pp. 1-12). Lund University.
[50]
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
[51]
Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for Specific Purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 347-366). Wiley-Blackwell.
[52]
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles. System, 30, 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
[53]
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: A Study of Linguitic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance. Discourse Studies, 10, 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010
[54]
Sadeghi, K., & Alinasab, M. (2020). Academic Conflict in Applied Linguistics Research Article Discussions: The Case of Native and Non-Native Writers. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.001
[55]
Sheldon, E. (2013). The Research Article: A Rhetorical and Functional Comparison of Texts Created by Native and Non-Native English Writers and Native Spanish Writers. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New South Wales. http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/
[56]
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
[57]
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (2nd ed.). The University of Michigan Press.
[58]
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting Verbs in Medical Journal Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90012-4
[59]
Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and Detachment in English and Bulgarian Academic Writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0
[60]
Yang, A., Zheng, S. Y., & Ge, G. C. (2015). Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Medical Research Articles: A Systemic Functional Perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005
[61]
Yang, R. Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research Articles in Applied linguistics: Moving from Results to Conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
