|
|
先验知识对元理解的双刃作用
|
Abstract:
在阅读过程中，人们不仅会利用先验知识，并且会运用元认知对所阅读内容进行更深入的理解。在先验知识与元理解的相关研究中，许多研究呈现了矛盾的结果，先验知识既可以对元理解监控产生积极作用，又由于熟悉性启发而产生的更为自信的元理解判断。基于以往的研究，我们认为先验知识对元理解可能存在“双刃”作用，今后的研究应进一步验证先验知识对元理解的“双刃”作用，并重视因先验知识及其所产生的熟悉感给元理解过程带来的影响。
In the process of reading, people will make use of prior knowledge and accurate meta-cognition to have a deeper understanding of what they read. In the related research of prior knowledge and meta-comprehension, many studies present contradictory results. Prior knowledge can not only play a positive role in monitoring of meta-comprehension, but also produce more confident judgment of meta-comprehension inspired by familiarity. Based on previous studies, we believe that prior knowledge may have a double-edged effect on meta-comprehension. Future studies should further verify the double-edged effect of prior knowledge on meta-comprehension, and pay attention to the impact of prior knowledge and its familiarity on the process of meta-comprehension.
| [1] | 陈启山(2009). 阅读中的元理解监测与元理解调控. 心理学报, 41(8), 676-683. |
| [2] | 王小庆, 张锦坤(2017). 基于执行意向的认知加工对多媒体学习影响的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学. |
| [3] | 许晓丽(2001). 阅读中多媒体材料及其呈现方式的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 大连: 辽宁师范大学. |
| [4] | 杨淑芸(2006). 想象膨胀中熟悉度与感知积累作用的实验研究. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学. |
| [5] | Abdelaal, N. M., & Sase, A. S. (2014). Rela-tionship between Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language & Literary Studies, 5, 125-131. |
| [6] | Afflerbach, P. (1990). The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Expert Readers’ Main Idea Construction Strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/747986 |
| [7] | Aghayan Golkashani, H., Leong, R. L. F., Wong, K. F., & Chee, M. W. L. (2021). Schema-Driven Memory Benefits Boost Transitive Inference in Older Adults. Psychology and Aging, 36, 463-474. |
| [8] | Ahmad, F. N., & Hockley, W. E. (2014). The Role of Familiarity in Associative Recognition of Unitized Compound Word Pairs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2301-2324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.923007 |
| [9] | Ahmad, F. N., Fernandes, M., & Hockley, W. E. (2015). Improving Associative Memory in Older Adults with Unitization. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22, 452-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.980216 |
| [10] | Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., & Readence, J. E. (1985). Prior Knowledge Activation and the Comprehension of Compatible and Incompatible Text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 420. https://doi.org/10.2307/747852 |
| [11] | Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Bloom, B. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. European legacy, 114, 1013-1014. |
| [12] | Bonus, J. A., & Watts, J. (2021). You Can’t Catch the Sun in a Net! Children’s Misinterpretations of Educational Science Television. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 202, Article ID: 105004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105004 |
| [13] | Buchweitz, A., Mason, R. A., Meschyan, G., Keller, T. A., & Just, M. A. (2014). Modulation of Cortical Activity during Comprehension of Familiar and Unfamiliar Text Topics in Speed Reading and Speed Listening. Brain & Language, 139, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.010 |
| [14] | Calvo, M. G. (2005). Relative Contribution of Vocabulary Knowledge and Working Memory Span to Elaborative Inferences in Reading. Learning Individual Differences, 15, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.07.002 |
| [15] | Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of Domain-Related Information in Relation to High and Low Domain Knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning Verbal Behavior, 18, 257-273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4 |
| [16] | De Bruin, A. B. H., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Improving Metacomprehension Accuracy and Self-Regulation in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: The Effect of Learner Expertise. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4-5, 671-688.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326204 |
| [17] | Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Michelle, M. B. (1999). The Relation between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69, 145-186.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145 |
| [18] | Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. (2013). Four Cornerstones of Calibration Research: Why Understanding Students’ Judgments Can Improve Their Achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.002 |
| [19] | Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-Term Working Memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211 |
| [20] | Gaultney, J. F. (1995). The Effect of Prior Knowledge and Metacognition on the Acquisition of a Reading Comprehension Strategy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1006 |
| [21] | Glenberg, A., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing Calibration of Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.2.119 |
| [22] | Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The Effects of Domain Knowledge on Metacomprehension Accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 37, 1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.1001 |
| [23] | Jacoby Bjork, R. A. K. C. (1994). Illusions of Comprehension, Competence, and Remembering (pp. 57-80). National Academy Press. |
| [24] | Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring One’s Own Knowledge during Study: A Cue-Utilization Approach to Judgments of Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 |
| [25] | Kumaran, D. (2013). Schema-Driven Facilitation of New Hierarchy Learning in the Transitive Inference Paradigm. Learning Memory & Cognition, 20, 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.030296.113 |
| [26] | Langer, J. A. (1984). Examining Background Knowledge and Text Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 468.
https://doi.org/10.2307/747918 |
| [27] | L？ffler, E., von der Linden, N., & Schneider, W. (2016). Influence of Domain Knowledge on Monitoring Performance across the Life Span. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 765-785.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2016.1208204 |
| [28] | Maki, R., Shields, M., Wheeler, A., & Zacchilli, T. (2005). Individual Differences in Absolute and Relative Metacomprehension Accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.723 |
| [29] | McNamara, D., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). The 4 Pronged Comprehension Strategy Framework. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 465-496). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. |
| [30] | Mihalca, L., & Mengelkamp, C. (2019). Effects of Induced Levels of Prior Knowledge on Monitoring Accuracy and Performance When Learning from Self-Regulated Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 795-810. |
| [31] | Nelson, T. (1996). Gamma Is a Measure of the Accuracy of Predicting Performance on One Item Relative to Another Item, Not of the Absolute Performance on an Individual Item Comments on Schraw (1995). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199606)10:3<257::AID-ACP400>3.0.CO;2-9 |
| [32] | Persaud, K., Macias, C., Hemmer, P., & Bonawitz, E. (2020). Evaluating Recall Error in Preschoolers: Category Expectations Influence Episodic Memory for Color. Cognitive Psychology, 124, Article ID: 101357. |
| [33] | Preston, A. R., & Eichenbaum, H. (2013). Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory. Current Biology, 23, R764-R773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.041 |
| [34] | Priebe, S. J., Keenan, J. M., & Miller, A. C. (2012). How Prior Knowledge Affects Word Identification and Comprehension. Reading Writing, 25, 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9260-0 |
| [35] | Prinz, A., Golke, S., & Wittwer, J. (2020). How Accurately Can Learners Discriminate Their Comprehension of Texts? A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Relative Metacomprehension Accuracy and Influencing Factors. Educational Research Review, 31, Article ID: 100358. |
| [36] | Rawson, K. A., & Van Overschelde, J. P. (2008). How Does Knowledge Promote Memory? The Distinctiveness Theory of Skilled Memory. Journal of Memory Language, 58, 646-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.004 |
| [37] | Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A Further Test of the General Monitoring Skill Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.236 |
| [38] | Smyth, A., & Naveh Benjamin, M. (2018). Existing Knowledge of Linguistic Structure Mitigates Associative Memory Deficits in Older Adults. Experimental Aging Research, 44, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2017.1398517 |
| [39] | Soto, C., De Blume, A. P. G., Asún, R., Jacovina, M., & Vásquez, C. (2018). A Deeper Understanding of Metacomprehension in Reading: Development of a New Multidimensional Tool. Frontline Learning Research, 6, 31-52.
https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i1.328 |
| [40] | Temelman-Yogev, L., Katzir, T., & Prior, A. (2020). Monitoring Com-prehension in a Foreign Language: Trait or Skill? Metacognition and Learning, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09245-5 |
| [41] | Toth, J., Daniels, K., & Solinger, L. (2011). What You Know Can Hurt You: Effects of Age and Prior Knowledge on the Accuracy of Judgments of Learning. Psychology and Aging, 26, 919-931. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023379 |
| [42] | van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Meeter, M. (2020). How to Optimize Knowledge Construction in the Brain. NPJ Science of Learning, 5, Article No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0064-y |
| [43] | Weeks, K. W. L. P., & Torrance, C. (2000). Written Drug Dosage Errors Made by Students: The Threat to Clinical Effectiveness and the Need for a New Approach. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 4, 20-29. |
