This quantitative study analysed gender, age and faculty differences in the learn- ing practices and other pertinent factors as perceived by the undergraduate students at the National University of Lesotho (NUL). The quota sampling method was used to select 312 students (n=312) from the seven faculties. Adopting the constructivism theory of learning, a validated and reliable questionnaire was constructed for data collection through a survey. The questionnaire had thirty seven items on the four categories of learning practices:？classroom practices, studying practices, assessment practices and academic integrity practices. Fifteen items focused on the pertinent personal factors and the institutional factors. All the items were measured on a five point Likert’s Scale. Data was analysed through statistical tools of Independent t-test and Analysis of Variance. Students perceived all the four learning practices above the mean level. Classroom practices and studying practices were perceived to be the highest and lowest learning practices, respectively. Academic integrity practice had a gender difference in students’ perception while age difference was determined in studying practices. Neither age nor gender difference was determined in students’ perception towards either the personal or the institutional factors pertinent to learning. Students perceived three learning practices？differently: assessment practices, studying practices and academic integrity practices. Studying practices and assessment practices were perceived the lowest by students in Science and Technology Faculty while academic integrity practices
References
[1]
Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and How of It. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4, 330-333.
https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032
[2]
Aguillon, S. M., Siegmund, G. F., Petipas, R. H., Drake, A. G., Cotner, S., & Ballen, C. J. (2020). Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048
[3]
Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st Century Skills through a Constructivist-Constructionist Learning Environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3, 205-216.
[4]
Alzaghoul, A. F. (2012). The Implication of the Learning Theories on Implementing E- Learning Courses. The Research Bulletin of Jordan ACM, 11, 27-30.
[5]
Areekkuzhiyil, S. (2019). Assessment Practices in Higher Education: Myths and Realities. University News, 57, 18-20.
[6]
Arquero, J. L., Fernandez-Polvillo, C., Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (2015). Vocation, Motivation and Approaches to Learning: A Comparative Study. Education and Training, 57, 13-30.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2013-0014
[7]
Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do Students Develop towards More Deep Approaches to Learning during Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 205-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
[8]
Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-Centred Learning Environments: An Investigation into Student Teachers’ Instructional Preferences and Approaches to Learning. Learning Environments Research, 19, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9190-5
[9]
Balam, E. M. (2015). Learning Strategies and Motivation of Graduate Students: Is Gender a Factor. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1, 1-9.
[10]
Baliyan, S. P., & Moorad, F. R. (2018). Teaching Effectiveness in Private Higher Education Institutions in Botswana: Analysis of Students’ Perceptions. International Journal of Higher Education, 7, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n3p143
[11]
Bhardwaj, P. (2019). Types of Sampling in Research. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 5, 157-163.
[12]
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25, 551-575.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
[13]
Borte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2020). Barriers to Student Active Learning in Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
[14]
Brau, B. (2020). Constructivism. In R. Kimmons, & S. Caskurlu (Eds.), The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research (pp. 33-43).
[15]
Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for Student Improvement: Understanding Hong Kong Teachers’ Conceptions and Practices of Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 347-363.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319737
[16]
Bruns, B., & Luque, J. (2014). Better Teachers for Latin America and the Caribbean: New Evidence on How to Raise Teacher Quality and Student Learning. World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0151-8_ch2
[17]
Cetin, B. (2016). Approaches to Learning and Age in Predicting College Students’ Academic Achievement. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 13, 21-28.
https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v13i1.9568
[18]
Chaika, G. (2020). Psychological Characteristics Influencing Personal Autonomy as a Factor of Psychological Well-Being. Psychological Journal, 6, 18-28.
https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.1.2
[19]
Chang, B. (2018). Patterns of Knowledge Construction. Adult Education Quarterly, 68, 108- 136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617751174
[20]
Chatterton, S. (2020). How do Young People Think They Learn? A Learning Theory Taxonomy Devised from Pupil Preferences, Cambridge Educational Research e-Journal, 7, 191-231.
[21]
Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring Student Perceptions, Learning Outcome and Gender Differences in a Flipped Mathematics Course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 1096-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12278
[22]
Corbin, A. (2017). Assessing Differences in Learning Styles: Age, Gender and Academic Performance at the Tertiary Level in the Caribbean. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 7, 67- 91.
[23]
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[24]
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[25]
Croy, S. R. (2018). Development of a Group Work Assessment Pedagogy Using Constructive Alignment Theory. Nurse Education Today, 6, 49-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.006
[26]
Derry, J. (2018). Knowledge in Education: Why Philosophy Matters. An Inaugural Professorial Lecture. UCL Institute of Education Press.
[27]
Dlouhá, J., & Pospísilová, M. (2018). Education for Sustainable Development Goals in Public Debate: The Importance of Participatory Research in Reflecting and Supporting the Consultation Process in Developing a Vision for Czech Education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4314-4327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.145
[28]
Duff, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Antecedents and Consequences of Accounting Students’ Approaches to Learning: A Cluster Analytic Approach. The British Accounting Review, 47, 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.003
[29]
Duy, N. B. P., Binh, L. C., & Giang, N. T. P. (2021). Factors Affecting Students’ Motivation for Learning at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. In K. Arai, S. Kapoor, & R. Bhatia (Eds.), Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (pp. 239-262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63089-8_15
[30]
Eddy-Spicer, D., Ehren, M., Bangpan, M., Khatwa, M., & Perrone, F. (2016). Under What Conditions Do Inspection, Monitoring and Assessment Improve System Efficiency, Service Delivery and Learning Outcomes for the Poorest and Most Marginalised? A Realist Synthesis of School Accountability in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
[31]
Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. M. (2019). Exploring New Elements of the Student Approaches to Learning Framework: The Role of Online Learning Technologies in Student Learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20, 11-24.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721384
[32]
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, and Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26, 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
[33]
Evans, D. K., & Popova, A. (2016). What Really Works to Improve Learning in Developing Countries? An Analysis of Divergent Findings in Systematic Reviews. The World Bank Research Observer, 31, 242-270. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkw004
[34]
Hailkari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2021). Student Perspectives on How Different Elements of Constructive Alignment Support Active Learning. Active Learn- ing in Higher Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
[35]
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What Works and Why? Student Perceptions of ‘Useful’ Digital Technology in University Teaching and Learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1567-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
[36]
Iannone, P., Czichwsky, C., & Ruf, J. (2020). The Impact of High Stakes Oral Performance Assessment on Students’ Approaches to Learning: A Case Study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09937-4
[37]
Jaiwal, P. (2019). Using Constructive Alignment to Foster Teaching Learning Processes. English Language Teaching, 12, 10-23. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p10
[38]
Khong, H. K., Hassan, N. H., & Ramli, N. (2017). Motivation and Gender Differences in Learning Spanish as a Foreign Language in a Malaysian Technical University. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14, 59-83.
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.2.3
[39]
Kington, A., Regan, E., Sammons, P., & Day, C. (2012). Effective Classroom Practice: A Mixed-Method Study of Influences and Outcomes: A Research Paper. The Nottingham Jubilee Press, School of Education, University of Nottingham.
[40]
Li, Y., & Oliveira, H. (2015) Research on Classroom Practice. In S. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 489-496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_46
[41]
Lumpkin, A., Achen, R. M., & Dodd, R. K. (2015). Student Perceptions of Active Learning. College Student Journal, 49, 121-133.
[42]
Mahmud, M., & Nur, S. (2018). Exploring Students’ Learning Strategies and Gender Differences in English Language Teaching. International Journal of Language Education, 2, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346
[43]
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
[44]
Mokhethi, M. C., Malunga, M. M. J., & Thetsane, R. M. (2019). Student’s Satisfaction Dimensions Contributing to Overall Satisfaction at the National University of Lesotho. Review of Contemporary Business Research, 8, 1-11.
[45]
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative Methods. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315172231
[46]
NUL (2015). National University of Lesotho’s Strategic Plan 2015-2020. National University of Lesotho.
[47]
NUL (2018). NUL—CHE Report of 18 April, 2018. National University of Lesotho.
[48]
Nurna, D. N., & Rudi, W. (2020). Factors Affecting the Learning Spirit of Students. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 99, 18-28.
[49]
O’Leary, M., & Wood, P. (2019). Reimagining Teaching Excellence: Why Collaboration, Rather than Competition, Holds the Key to Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Educational Review, 71, 122-139.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1524203
[50]
Omodan, B. I. (2019). Democratic Pedagogy in South Africa: A Rethinking Viewpoint for Knowledge Construction. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10, 188-203.
[51]
Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ Approaches to Learning and Their Experiences of the Teaching-Learning Environment in Different Disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 269- 282. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X476946
[52]
Picton, C., Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). “Hardworking, Determined and Happy”: First- Year Students’ Understanding and Experience of Success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 1260-1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1478803
[53]
Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G., & Vezzani, C. (2018). The Relationship between Conceptions of Learning and Academic Outcomes in Middle School Students According to Gender Differences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 45-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.11.001
[54]
Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, L. (2016). Relationship between Motivational Goal Orientations, Perceptions of General Education Classroom Learning Environment, and Deep Approaches to Learning. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37, 100-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2015.01.001
[55]
Postareff, L., Mattson, M., & Parpala, A. (2018). The Effect of Perceptions of the Teaching- Learning Environment on the Variation in Approaches to Learning—Between-Student Dif- ferences and Within-Student Variation. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 96-107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.006
[56]
Richardson, J. T. E. (2013). Approaches to Studying across the Adult Life Span: Evidence from Distance Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 74-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.012
[57]
Saar, E., Taht, K., & Roosalu, T. (2014). Institutional Barriers for Adults’ Participation in Higher Education in Thirteen European Countries. Higher Education, 68, 691-710.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9739-8
[58]
Sinclair, J., & Aho, A. M. (2018). Experts on Super Innovators: Understanding Staff Adoption of Learning Management Systems. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609
[59]
Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The Role of Authentic Assessment to Preserve Academic Integrity and Promote Skill Development and Employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 2132-2148.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
[60]
Spiegel, S. J. (2020). Visual Storytelling and Socio-Environmental Change: Images, Photographic Encounters, and Knowledge Construction in Resource Frontiers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110, 120-144.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1613953
[61]
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
[62]
Tight, M. (2014). Discipline and Theory in Higher Education Research. Research Papers in Education, 29, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.729080
[63]
Tlali, T. (2019a). Continuing Professional Development of Lecturers at the National University of Lesotho: Challenges and Milestones. International Journal of African Higher Education, 5, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v5i1.10966
[64]
Tlali, T. (2019b). Creating an Environment That Nurtures Deep Learning: How Does the National University of Lesotho Fare? Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14, 19-31.
[65]
Tlali, T., & Jacobs, L. (2015). Teaching and Assessment Practices at the National University of Lesotho: Some Critical Comments. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
[66]
Toylan, N., Semercioz, F., & Hassan, M. (2020). Knowledge Sharing in Strategic Alliance Relationships: An Empirical Research on Hotels in Turkey. European Journal of Tourism Research, 24, 2403-2403.
[67]
Uiboleht, K., Karm, M., & Postareff, L. (2018). The Interplay between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching, Students’ Approaches to learning And Learning Outcomes: A Qualitative Multi-Case Study. Learning Environment Research, 21, 321-347.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9257-1
[68]
Van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Meeter, M. (2020). How to Optimize Knowledge Construction in the Brain? Science of Learning, 5, Article No. 5.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0064-y
[69]
Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 269-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
[70]
Wahlheim, C. N., McDaniel, M. A., & Little, J. L. (2016). Category Learning Strategies in Younger and Older Adults: Rule Abstraction and Memorization. Psychology and Aging, 31, 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000083
[71]
Webber, K. L. (2012). The Use of Learner-Centered Assessment in US Colleges and Universities. Research in Higher Education, 53, 201-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9245-0
[72]
White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Rangachari, P. K. et al. (2016). Adopting an Active Learning Approach to Teaching in a Research-Intensive Higher Education Context Transformed Staff Teaching Attitudes and Behaviours. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 619-633.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107887
[73]
Wongwatkit, C., Panjaburee, P., Srisawadsi, N., & Seprum, P. (2020). Moderating Effects of Gender Differences on the Relationships between Perceived Learning Support, Intention to Use, and Learning Performance in a Personalized E-Learning. Journal of Computer Education, 7, 22-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00154-9
[74]
Zhao, Y., Kuan, H. K., Chung, J. O. K., Chan, C. K. Y., & Li, W. H. C. (2018). Students’ Approaches to Learning in a Clinical Practicum: A Psychometric Evaluation Based on Item Response Theory. Nurse Education Today, 66, 179-186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.015
