In today’s digital age, the innovation of smart campuses can bring convenience to the instruction and management of schools. However, parents’ support with continued usage determines the application and implementation of smart campus system (SCS). Thus, it is necessary to explore the parents’ continuance intention factors of usage of SCS. Based on the existing studies and theories on continuance intention to use (CIU), a research model composed of ten hypotheses was designed to test what factors could predict the kindergarten parents’ CIU and the expectancy-confirmation factors. From the data analysis, we could conclude that satisfaction, perceived usefulness,expectation confirmation, subjective norms, and perceived ease of use were positively correlated. It is hoped that the results can be a reference for SCS system designers and managers to improve the SCS implementation in order to facilitate kindergarten children’s learning.
References
[1]
Abdrabbah, S. B., Ayachi, R., & Amor, N. B. (2018). Social Activities Recommendation System for Students in Smart Campus. International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services, Vol. 76, 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59480-4_46
[2]
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[3]
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[4]
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[5]
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25, 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
[6]
Bi, T. P., Yang, X. M., & Ren, M. L. (2017). The Design and Implementation of Smart Campus System. Journal of Computers, 12, 527-533. https://doi.org/10.17706/jcp.12.6.527-533
[7]
Cadotte, E. R., Woodruff, R. B., & Jenkins, R. L. (1987). Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400307
[8]
Chao, H. (2017). On Study of Building Smart Campus under Conditions of Cloud Computing and Internet of Things. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 100, Article ID: 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/100/1/012118
[9]
Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018). Student Continuance of Learning Management System Use: A Longitudinal Exploration. Computers & Education, 120, 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004
[10]
Chou, H. K., Lin, I. C., Woung, L. C., & Tsai, M. T. (2012). Engagement in E-Learning Opportunities: An Empirical Study on Patient Education Using Expectation Confirmation Theory. Journal of Medical Systems, 36, 1697-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9630-9
[11]
Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P., & Stanganelli, L. (2014). Smarter Universities: A Vision for the Fast Changing Digital Era. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25, 1003-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007
[12]
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 3, 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[13]
Der Heijden, H. V. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28, 695-704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
[14]
Ebbeck, M., Yim, H. Y. B., Chan, Y., & Goh, M. (2016). Singaporean Parents’ Views of Their Young Children’s Access and Use of Technological Devices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0695-4
[15]
Erdogan, N. I., Johnson, J. E., Dong, P. I., & Qiu, Z. (2019). Do Parents Prefer Digital Play? Examination of Parental Preferences and Beliefs in Four Nations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0901-2
[16]
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[17]
Foster, J. J., Barkus, E., & Yavorsky, C. (2006). Understanding and Using Advanced Statistics: A Practical Guide for Students. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020154
[18]
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
[19]
Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Mobile Technology in the Classroom: What Drives Student-Lecturer Interactions? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34, 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1380970
[20]
Gao, Q., Yan, Z., Wei, C., Liang, Y., & Mo, L. (2017). Three Different Roles, Five Different Aspects: Differences and Similarities in Viewing School Mobile Phone Policies among Teachers, Parents, and Students. Computers & Education, 106, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.007
[21]
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
[22]
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
[23]
He, Y., Stojmenovic, I., Liu, Y., & Gu, Y. (2014). Smart City. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10, Article ID: 867593. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/867593
[24]
Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2017). Virtual World Continuance Intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.009
[25]
Hsiao, C. H., Chang, J. J., & Tang, K.Y. (2016). Exploring the Influential Factors in Continuance Usage of Mobile Social Apps: Satisfaction, Habit, and Customer Value Perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 342-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.014
[26]
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of Relationships among Students’ Self-Determination, Technology Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Continuance Intention to Use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
[27]
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
[28]
Kumar, R. R., Israel, D., & Malik, G. (2018). Explaining Customer’s Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Banking Apps with an Integrative Perspective of ECT and Self-Determination Theory. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 79-112. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.10204
[29]
Kwok, L. F. (2015). A Vision for the Development of i-Campus. Smart Learning Environments, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0009-8
[30]
Lau, E. Y. H., & Ng, M. L. (2019). Are They Ready for Home-School Partnership? Perspectives of Kindergarten Principals, Teachers and Parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.019
[31]
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention toward e-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation-Confirmation Model. Computers and Education, 54, 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
[32]
Lee, S. M., Seo, H. A., & Han, H. J. (2014). Use of Smart Devices of Infants and Preschool-Children and Their Mothers’ Perceptions. Korean Journal of Childcare and Education, 10, 111-131. https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2014.10.2.111
[33]
Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2008). Understanding Information Systems Continuance. The Case of Internet-Based Learning Technologies. Information and Management, 45, 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005
[34]
Liu, H. H., Shao, M. M., Liu, X. H., & Zhao, L. (2021), Exploring the Influential Factors on Readers’ Continuance Intentions of E-Book APPs: Personalization, Usefulness, Playfulness, and Satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640110
[35]
Liu, J., & Liu, M. (2020). Application Design and Implementation for Smart Kindergarten. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1584, Article ID: 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1584/1/012009
[36]
Luo, L. (2018). Data Acquisition and Analysis of Smart Campus Based on Wireless Sensor. Wireless Personal Communications, 102, 2897-2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5314-4
[37]
Meyer, M., Adkins, V., Yuan, N., Weeks, H. M., Chang, Y. J., & Radesky, J. (2019). Advertising in Young Children’s Apps: A Content Analysis. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 40, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000622
[38]
Montessori, M. (1967). The Discovery of the Child (M. J. Costello, Trans.). Ballantine.
[39]
Montessori, M. (1989a). Creative Development in the Child I (R. Ramachandran, Trans.). Kalakshetra Press.
[40]
Montessori, M. (1989b). Creative Development in the Child II (R. R, Trans.). Kalakshetra Press.
[41]
Mouakket, S. (2015). Factors Influencing Continuance Intention to Use Social Network Sites: The Facebook Case. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.045
[42]
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[43]
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
[44]
Pagliaro, F., Mattoni, B., Gugliermenti, F., Bisegna, F., Azzaro, B., Tomei, F., & Catucci, S. (2016). A Roadmap toward the Development of Sapienza Smart Campus. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, Florence, 7-10 June 2016, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2016.7555573
[45]
Papadakis, S., Zaranis, N., & Kalogiannaki, M. (2019). Parental Involvement and Attitudes towards Young Greek Children’s Mobile Usage. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 22, Article ID: 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.100144
[46]
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and Instruction in the Hybrid Virtual Classroom: An Investigation of Students’ Engagement and the Effect of Quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, Article ID: 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
[47]
Rahman, M. N. A., Syed-Zamri, S. N. A., & Eu, L. K. (2017). A Meta-Analysis Study of Satisfaction and Continuance Intention to Use Educational Technology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7, 1059-1072. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2915
[48]
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-Learning Continuance Intention in the Workplace: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1585-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
[49]
Sanchez, A., & Golding, I. (2013). Genetic Determinants and Cellular Constraints in Noisy Gene Expression. Science, 342, 1188-1193. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242975
[50]
Sari, S. W., Ciptadi, P. W., & Hardyanto, R. H. (2017). Study of Smart Campus Development Using Internet of Things Technology. IAES International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics, Semarang, 23-25 November 2016, Article ID: 012032. https://doi.org/10.11591/eecsi.v3i1.1126
[51]
Shi, N., Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C., & Chen, H. (2010). The Continuance of Online Social Networks: How to Keep People Using Facebook? Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Honolulu, 5-8 January 2010, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.369
[52]
Sin, S. J., & Kim, K. (2013). International Students’ Everyday Life Information Seeking: The Informational Value of Social Networking Sites. Library & Information Science Research, 35, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.006
[53]
Singh, A., Payal, A., & Bharti, S. (2019). The Emerging IoT Paradigm: Visualizing inside Functionalities, Key Features, and Open Issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 143, 111-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.013
[54]
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
[55]
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
[56]
Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T. (2018). Exploring the Influential Factors of Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Apps: Extending the Expectation Confirmation Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5
[57]
Torres-Sospedra, J., Avariento, J., Rambla, D., Montoliu, R., Casteleyn, S., Benedito-Bordonau, M., Gould, M., & Huerta, J. (2015). Enhancing Integrated Indoor/Outdoor Mobility in a Smart Campus. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29, 1955-1968. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1049541
[58]
Van Merode, D., Tabunshchyk, G., Patrakhalko, K., & Yuriy, G. (2016). Flexible Technologies for Smart Campus. International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Madrid, 24-26 February 2016, 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2016.7444441
[59]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[60]
Wang, L.Y. K., Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability Factors Predicting Continuance of Intention to Use Cloud e-Learning Application. Heliyon, 5, e01788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788
[61]
Wang, Y., & Yan, X. (2018). Research and Implementation of Wisdom Campus System Based on Android Platform. International Conference on Education & Management, Vol. 53, 151-154. https://doi.org/10.2991/icem-17.2018.33
[62]
Xu, X., Wang, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Teaching Performance Evaluation in Smart Campus. IEEE Access, 6, 77754-77766. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884022
[63]
Yang, A. M., Li, S. S., Ren, C. H., Liu, H. X., Han, Y., & Liu, L. (2018). Situational Awareness System in the Smart Campus. IEEE Access, 6, 63976-63986. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877428
[64]
Zaballos, A., Briones, A., Massa, A., Centelles, P., & Caballero C. V. (2020). A Smart Campus’ Digital Twin for Sustainable Comfort Monitoring. Sustainability, 12, 9196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219196
[65]
Zhao, J., Li, J., & Jia, J. (2021a). A Study on Posture-Based Teacher-Student Behavioral Engagement Pattern. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article ID: 102749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102749
[66]
Zhao, L., He, W., & Su, Y. S. (2021b). Innovative Pedagogy and Design-Based Research on Flipped Learning in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.577002
