Research and Practice of Training Effect Evaluation System Based on Kirkpatrick Model—Taking Teacher Training System of Zhejiang Open University as an Example
The present era is a complex, diversified and global
knowledge economy era. Adult higher education in China is faced with many
challenges in obtaining and maintaining its competitive advantage. In order to
deal with these challenges and improve the competitiveness, we must take the
increment of human capital of adult college teachers as the premise, and
teachers’ continuing education is an important means. However, in the actual
operation process, many teacher trainingsare eager for quick success and instant benefits, and fails to grasp the
rational training strategy of team building from a strategic perspective. At present, some trainers are
armchair due to the lack of front-line teaching experience, which makes the
training effect too wet to be applied in actual combat or has guiding and
reference significance(Shi,2007). This
paper takes Zhejiang Open University teaching staff training center in nearly
three years project as the research subject, through the analysis of the
existing training effect evaluation model of the commonly used at home and
abroad, analyzes the model’s application
environment and evaluation level and so on, is open to Zhejiang university
system problems that exist in the teacher training effect evaluation activities
carried on the investigation and study, and analyzes the reasons of these
problems. Through the construction of effective training effect evaluation
system and the corresponding evaluation
model to solve these problems. Referring to the academic
References
[1]
Cao, H., & Zhang, Y. J. (2019). Evaluation System of Executive Training Based on Offset Model and Its Application. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, No. S2, 45-48.
[2]
Fan, S., Jin, Z., & Li, J. X. (2019). Research on Evaluation Model of Material Team Training Effect in Electric Power Enterprises Based on Offset Model. China Market, No. 1, 124-125.
[3]
Lan, M. P. (2015). Evaluation of the Training Effect of Middle Management Cadres in Colleges and Universities Based on CSE Evaluation Model. School Party Building and Ideological Education, No. 22, 39-40.
[4]
Li, J., & Liu, Q. (2006). The Position of Employee Training in Enterprises. Training in China, No. 8, 84-87.
[5]
Lin, Z. J., & Feng, X. D. (2015). How to Do a Good Job in Training Evaluation—Quad-Level Offbeat Evaluation Method (pp. 22-82). Beijing: Press of Electronics Industry.
[6]
Liu, X. S. (2006). Study on Training Effect Evaluation System of ZY Life Insurance Company (pp. 4-5, 40-51). Master’s Dissertation, Xi’an: Northwestern University.
[7]
Ma, J. L. (2018). Application of the Offset Model in the Training Evaluation of Dual-Qualified Teachers in Universities. Think Tank Times, No. 28, 243-245.
[8]
Nooyi, R. A. (2007). Employee Training and Development “M” (pp. 111-113). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
[9]
Shi, J. T. (2008). Training and Development (pp. 140-147). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
[10]
Shi, Z. Y. (2007). Shaping the Competitiveness of Enterprises in the Era of Knowledge Economy. Chinese and Foreign Management, 41-44.
[11]
Song, L. et al. (2019). The Application of Coriolis Evaluation Model in the Training of New Nurses in ICU. Chinese Nursing Education, No. 10, 763-767.
[12]
Yan, Q. Y., & Cao, Y. (2006). Discussion on Evaluation Mode of Employee Training Effect. Jiangxi Administrative Student Newspaper, Supplement, 21-23.
[13]
Yang, H.-C. (2007). Research on the Status Quo of Training Management in Chinese Enterprises. Scientific Management Research, No. 1, 65-66.
[14]
Zhao, S. M., & Hao, C. S. (2008). Research on the Current Situation of Human Resource Management in Chinese Enterprise Group. Human Resource Development and Management, 1-5.
