The article presents the results of variety studies
on the decorative and economic-biological characteristics of Hibiscus syriacus L. in the conditions
of Tashkent. It is established that the soil and climatic conditions of
Tashkent are quite favorable for the cultivation of Syrian hibiscus. As a result
of a comprehensive assessment, the most promising, promising and fewer
promising varieties were identified. It is noted that the most promising—both
forms and the Speciosus variety are
characterized by better adaptability. Promising varieties—Luce, Red Heart, Russian Violet in a short time were able
to adapt to new conditions, and were able to
maintain their decorative and biological qualities. Pink Flirt, Rubis and Totus Albus are among the less promising
varieties. These varieties were introduced to Uzbekistan in recent years and
have not yet been able to fully adapt. The Aphrodite variety, which is part of
the group of less promising varieties, has not been able to sufficiently show
decorative and economic and biological qualities for a long time.
References
[1]
Zykova, V.K. (2014) Complex Variety Evaluation of Syringa vulgaris L. Collection of Scientific Papers of the GNBS. Journal of Biology, 136, 99-106.
[2]
Kwon, H.J., Kwon, S. and Kim, K.S. (2010) Ultrastructural Changes of Hibiscus syriacus L. during the Petal Senescence. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology, 51, 135-140.
[3]
Babkina, V.M. (1976) Results of the Primary Variety Testing of Part on the Southern Coast of the Crimea. In: Introduction, Selection and Biology of Flower Plants, Tr. Gos. NBS, Yalta, No. 38, 39-52.
[4]
Bylov, V.N. (1978) Fundamentals of Comparative Variety Evaluation of Ornamental Plants. In: Introduction and Selection of Flower Plants, Nauka, Moscow, 7-32.
[5]
Bakanova, V.V. (1983) Flower-Decorative Perennials of Open Ground. Nauk Dumka, Kiev, 15 p.
[6]
Karandasova, O.S., Bazavlutskaya, A.S., Kanakhina, L.I. and Abramova, S.N. (1987) Variety Study and Variety Assessment of Flower-Decorative Cultures. In: Introduction and Ecology of Plants, Ylim, Ashgabat, No. 10, 3-37.
[7]
Zaytseva, E.P. and Timokhina, E.T. (1988) The Results They Explore the Garden of Hyacinths in the Main Botanical Garden of the USSR Academy. In: Introduction to the Study and Breeding of Ornamental Plants, Nauka, Moscow, 22-31.
[8]
Rusinov, T.S. (1988) Daylilies in the Main Botanical Garden of the USSR Academy. In: Introduction to the Study and Breeding of Ornamental Plants, Nauka, Moscow, 72-79.
[9]
Ostapko, V.M. (2009) Scale for Assessing the Decorative Nature of Petrophytic Species of Flora in the South-East of Ukraine. Inproduktsiya roslin. No. 1, 18-22.
[10]
Zalevskaya, E.M. (1991) The Rhythm of Hybrid Hibiscus Development and the Experience of Assessing Their Decorative and Economic-Biological Characteristics. In: Introduction and Acclimatization of Plants, FAN Publishing House, Tashkent, 24, 36-41.
[11]
Tereshchenko, S.I. (1994) Evaluation of Decorative Properties of Lilac Species and Varieties. In: Abstract of International Conference. Donetsk Nerd. Garden of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine “Industrial Botany: State and Prospects of Development”, Donetsk, 276-277.
[12]
Zhigunov, O.Yu. and Nasurdinova, R.A. (2012) The Experience of Assessing the Decorative Properties of Varieties of the Genus clematis L.—A Promising Crop for the Southern Urals. No. 3, 8-11.
[13]
Tyshchenko, E.L. (2017) New Approaches to the Methodology for Assessing the Decorative and Economic-Biological Characteristics of Hybrid Hibiscus. Subtropical and Ornamental Gardening, No. 62, Krasnodar, 122-128.
[14]
Plugatar, S.A., Klimenko, Z.K. and Zykova, V.K. (2018) A Modified Scale for Assessing the Decorativeness of Tea-Hybrid Roses in the Conditions of the Southern Coast of the Crimea. Bulletin of the GNBS, 126, 3-41.
[15]
Zubkova, N.V. (2018) Scale of Integrated Assessment of Clematis L. Varieties under Cultivation in the Conditions of the Southern Coast of the Crimea. GNBS Bulletin, No. 129, 3-44.
[16]
Timkina, Yu.V. (2011) Economic and Biological Potential of the Hibiscus syriacus L. in the Conditions of the Western Ciscaucasia: Abstract of the Dissertation. Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Krasnodar, 24c.
[17]
Tyshchenko, E.L. and Timkina, Yu. (2011) A Study of Hibiscus syriacus L. in the South Asciimations Aspects of Assessment Decorative Features of Hibiscus syriacus (Hibiscus syriacus L.). Scientific Journal of Kubsau, 66, 17-24.
[18]
Feofilova, G.F. and Shevchenko, S.V. (1981) Features of Form Formation in Distant Kanna Hybrids/Introduction, Biology and Selection of Flower Plants. Collection of Scientific Works. Yalta, 95-103.
[19]
Yoziev, L.H. (2001) Experience of Introduction of Woody Plants in Southern Uzbekistan. Fan, Tashkent, 210 p.
[20]
Samatova, Sh.A. (2018) Cannes in a Hot and Dry Climate. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, 128 p.
