全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

青少年应激源对心理健康的影响:应对方式与自我效能感的多重中介作用
The Stressor of Teenagers Effect Mental Health: The Multiple Mediating between Coping Style and Self-Efficacy

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.95101, PP. 822-830

Keywords: 应激源,应对方式,自我效能感,心理健康,多重中介
Stressor
, Coping Style, Self-Efficacy, Mental Health, Multiple Mediator

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究旨在探讨应激源、应对方式、自我效能感与心理健康之间的关系,以及应对方式与自我效能感在其中的中介作用。研究采用中学生应激源量表、简易应对方式量表、一般自我效能感量表和SCL-90量表。结果表明:1) 应激源与消极应对方式和心理健康水平呈显著负相关,消极应对方式对心理健康具有负向预测作用。2) 自我效能感与心理健康水平呈显著正相关,自我效能感对心理健康具有正向预测作用。3) 消极应对方式和自我效能感在应激源和心理健康之间起显著中介作用。4) 此外,积极应对在应激源和心理健康之间的中介作用不显著。这说明消极应对方式和自我效能感影响到心理健康水平,应激源到心理健康的多重中介模型成立。
The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between stressor, coping style, self-efficacy and mental health, in which the mediating effect of the coping style and self-efficacy was also examined. This research utilizes Stressors Scale for Middle School Students, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Symptom Check List 90 and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Results indi-cated that: 1) Stressor and negative coping style was significantly correlated with mental health, and negative coping style could significantly predict mental health. 2) Self-efficacy was signifi-cantly correlated with mental health, and self-efficacy could significantly predict mental health. 3) Negative coping style and self-efficacy played a significant mediated role between the stressor and mental health. This revealed that negative coping style and self-efficacy had a strong mediating effect between the stressor and mental health. 4) Besides, the mediating effect of positive coping style between stressor and mental health was not significant. This shows that stressor influences mental health through negative coping style and self-efficacy. Multiple mediator model from stressor to mental health was supported.

References

[1]  陈云祥, 李若璇, 刘翔平(2019). 消极退缩、积极应对对青少年网络成瘾的影响: 孤独感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(1), 94-98.
[2]  方菁, 王雅婷, 肖水源, 赵美, 江慧, 等(2018). 简易应对方式问卷在青少年中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(5), 905-909.
[3]  海曼, 秦屹, 熊俊梅, 吴慧玲(2019). 情绪调节自我效能感与心理健康的交叉滞后研究. 心理科学, 42(1), 82-87.
[4]  解亚宁(1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 6(2), 53-54.
[5]  金华, 吴文源, 张明园(1986). 中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, (5), 260-263.
[6]  金怡(2007). 生活应激研究现状与展望. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 29(1), 33-37.
[7]  李英琦, 姜峰, 韩丹丹, 郝学敏, 张敏, 牛志颖(2019). 应对方式在医学院校硕士新生自我效能感与抑郁间的多重中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(5), 773-777.
[8]  梁斌, 苏春蓉(2011). 来自四川地震灾区的大学新生一般自我效能感、应对方式与心理健康的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 669-671.
[9]  凌宇(2013). 神经质人格调节青少年应激与抑郁症状的追踪研究. 心理与行为研究, 11(3), 411-416.
[10]  刘双金, 胡义秋, 孙焕良(2018). 生活事件对大学生抑郁的影响: 神经质与应对方式的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(6), 1230-1233.
[11]  毛艳霞(2005). 高师大学生应激源、应对方式与心理健康的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 13(2), 136-138.
[12]  佟月华(2003). 低收入大学生一般自我效能感、主观幸福感研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 11(4), 294-295.
[13]  万伦, 顾昭明, 李晓妍(2017). 硕士新生的自我效能感对应对方式和抑郁的中介效应. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(8). 1243-1245.
[14]  魏军锋(2015). 留守儿童的社会支持与生活满意度——希望与应对方式的多重中介效应. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(5), 361-365.
[15]  吴文源, 金华, 迟玉芬, 樊彬(1987). 症状自评量表SCL90对各种不同精神疾患评定的应用. 上海精神医学, (1), 18-23.
[16]  肖计划, 许秀峰(1996). “应付方式问卷”效度与信度研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 10(4), 164-168.
[17]  曾天德(2006). 高职护理生生活事件、应对方式及心理健康的关系研究. 心理与行为研究, 4(2), 107-113.
[18]  张瑶, 宋维真, 姚林, 夏朝云, 冯而娟, 张宗卫, 郭艳容, 于彦英, 邹之光(1992). 生活事件、性格对某些心身疾病的影响的调查分析. 心理学报, 25(1), 37-44.
[19]  赵丽丽, 许华山, 焦东亮, 李礼, 李婷婷(2012). 留守儿童的心理健康、应对方式及一般自我效能感的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(1), 72-74.
[20]  郑全全, 陈树林(1999). 中学生应激源量表的初步编制. 心理发展与教育, 15(4), 45-49.
[21]  郑全全, 陈树林, 郑胜圣, 黄丽君(2001). 中学生心理应激的初步研究. 心理科学, 24(2), 212-213.
[22]  Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 139-161.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[23]  Chen, C. (2016). The Role of Resilience and Coping Styles in Subjective Well-Being among Chinese University Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 377-387.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0274-5
[24]  Diener, E. (2000). Subjective Well-Being. The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
[25]  Joffe, P. E., & Bast, B. A. (1978). Coping and Defense in Relation to Accommodation among a Sample of Blind Men. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166, 537-552.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197808000-00001
[26]  Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.
[27]  Mittal, V. A., & Walker, E. F. (2011). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Psychiatry Research, 189, 158-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.006
[28]  Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
[29]  Wang, P., Xiong, Z., & Yang, H. (2018). Relationship of Mental Health, Social Support, and Coping Styles among Graduate Students: Evidence from Chinese Universities. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 47, 689-697. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005982/
[30]  Wood, R., Atkins, P., & Tabernero, C. (2000). Self-Efficacy and Strategy on Complex Task. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 430-446.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00024
[31]  Zhang, J. X., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring Optimistic Self-Beliefs: A Chinese Adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38, 174-181.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133