The syntactic structure of numbers in Arabic mainly differs from that of Hebrew in terms of the order of units and decades. In Arabic (inverted), two-digit numbers are written and read from right to left, i.e. the first digit is the units and the second is the decades (24 = four and twenty), while in Hebrew (non-inverted), the reverse. Therefore, studying transcoding in the two languages may enable us to tease out the relative effects of linguistic experience (first versus second language) and counting system transparency i.e. the syntactic representation of numbers (inverted versus non-inverted number system). For this purpose, the paradigm of reading and writing two-digit numbers from dictation, in both languages was used. Sixty university bilingual students were given two tasks in both Arabic-L1 (First language) and Hebrew-L2 (Second language): One task involved writing two-digit numbers to dictation, and the other involved reading two-digit numbers aloud. Reading times and the error rates were calculated in both languages according to type of error—total errors, substitution errors (replacement of two-digit number units with decades, and vice versa; for example, 23 ? 32), change errors (change of one digit 23 ? 28), and omission errors (omission of one digit; for example 23 ? 2). The participants made some errors in reading and especially in writing two-digit numbers. Their commonest errors were substitution errors compared to change and omission errors. Such errors were commoner for numbers which require processing the numerical syntactic structure than for decade numbers, or numbers from 11 to 19, which require less attention to numerical syntax. Speed and accuracy are greater in Arabic-L1 than Hebrew-L2, although the Arabic counting system has the inversion feature, and is thus less transparent than Hebrew. It is concluded that familiarity with the verbal counting system of the first language has a greater influence on transcoding than the transparency of the counting system. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
[1]
Bahnmueller, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2018). A Taxonomy Proposal for Types of Interactions of Language and Place-Value Processing in Multi-Digit Numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01024
[2]
Blanken, G., Dorn, M., & Sinn, H. (1997). Inversion Errors in Arabic Number Reading: Is There a Nonsemantic Route? Brain and Cognition, 34, 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0917
[3]
Booth, P., Clenton, J., & Van Herwegen, J. (2018). L1-L2 Semantic and Syntactic Processing: The Influence of Language Proximity. System, 78, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.011
[4]
Brizuela, B. M., & Cayton, G. A. (2008). Interpretation and Production of Numbers in 5-7 Year Old Children through Different Representational Systems: Factorial Analyses. In 4th International Conference on Writing, Speech, and Context. Queretaro, Mexico.
[5]
Brysbaert, M., Fias, W., & Noel, M. P. (1998). The Whorfian Hypothesis and Numerical Cognition: Is “Twenty-Four” Processed in the Same Way as “Four-and-Twenty“? Cognition, 66, 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00006-7
[6]
Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D. (2008). Numerical Thought with and without Words: Evidence from Indigenous Australian Children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 13179-13184. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806045105
[7]
Cayton, G. A., & Brizuela, B. M. (2007). First Graders’ Strategies for Numerical Notation, Number Reading and the Number Concept. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31rst Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 81-88). Seoul: Seoul National University.
[8]
De Cruz, H. (2009). Is Linguistic Determinism an Empirically Testable Hypothesis? Logique & Analyse, 208, 327-341.
[9]
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of Numerical Abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
[10]
Dewaele, J. M. (2007). Predicting Language Learners’ Grades in the L1, L2, L3 and L4: The Effect of Some Psychological and Sociocognitive Variables. International Journal of Multilingualism, 4, 169-197. https://doi.org/10.2167/ijm080.0
[11]
Dowker, A., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2016). Linguistic Influences on Mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01035
[12]
Dowker, A., Bala, S., & Lloyd, D. (2008). Linguistic Influences on Mathematical Development: How Important Is the Transparency of the Counting System. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802285511
[13]
Everett, C. (2005). Independent Cross-Cultural Data Reveal Linguistic Effects on Basic Numerical Cognition. Language and Cognition, 5, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0005
[14]
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Vaid, J. (1993). Activation of Number Facts in Bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 21, 809-818. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202748
[15]
Ganayim, D., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). Number Processing of Arabic and Hebrew Bilinguals: Evidence Supporting the Distance Effect. Japanese Psychological Research, 56, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12035
[16]
Ganayim, D., & Ibrahim, R. (2015) Number Processing in Arabic and Hebrew Bilinguals: Evidence Supporting the Compatibility Effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115573316
[17]
Göbel, S. M., Moeller, K., Kaufmann, L., Pixner, S., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2014). Language Affects Symbolic Arithmetic in Children: The Case of Number Word Inversion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.001
[18]
Göbel, S. M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 543-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111406251
[19]
Imbo, I., Vanden Bulcke, C., De Brauwer, J., & Fias, W. (2014). Sixty-Four or Four-and-Sixty? The Influence of Lan-guage and Working Memory on Children’s Number Transcoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00313
[20]
Lonneman, J., & Yan, S. (2015). Does Number Word Inversion Affect Arithmetic Processes in Adults? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2015.01.002
[21]
McClain, L., & Shih Huang, J. Y. (1982). Speed of Simple Arithmetic in Bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 10, 591-596. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202441
[22]
Miura, I. T., Kim, C. C., Chang, C. M., & Okamoto, Y. (1988). Effects of Language Characteristics on Children’s Cognitive Representation of Numbers: Cross-National Comparisons. Child Development, 59, 1445-1450. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130659
[23]
Noel, M. P., & Turconi, E. (1999). Assessing Number Transcoding in Children. European Review of Applied Psychology, 49, 295-302.
[24]
Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2005). Language Effects in Magnitude Comparison: Small, But Not Irrelevant. Brain and Language, 92, 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.107
[25]
Pixner, S., Moeller, K., Hermanova, V., Nuerk, H. C., & Kaufmann, L. (2011). Whorf Reloaded: Language Effects on Non-Verbal Number Processing in 1st Grade—A Trilingual Study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.002
[26]
Pixner, S., Zuber, J., Hermanova, V., Kaufmann, L., Nuerck, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2011). One Language Two Number-Word Systems and Many Problems: Numerical Cognition in the Czech Language. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2683-2689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.004
[27]
Power, R. J. D., & Dal Martello, M. F. (1990). The Dictation of Italian Numerals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008402106
[28]
Power, R. J. D., & Dal Martello, M. F. (1997). From 834 to Eighty Thirty-Four: The Reading of Arabic Numerals by Seven-Year-Old Children. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467997387489
[29]
Prior, A., Katz, M., Mahajna, I., & Rubinsten, O. (2015). Number Word Structure in First and Second Language Influences Arithmetic Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00266
[30]
Proios, H., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (2002). Number Representation Deficit: A Bilingual Case of Failure to Access Written Verbal Numeral Representations. Aeuropsychologia, 40, 2341-2349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00085-4
[31]
Scheuer, N., Sinclair, A., Merlo de Rivas, S., & Tieche-Christinat, C. (2000). When a Hundred and Seventy One Is Written 10071: Five to Eight-Year-Olds’ Production of Written Numerals. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 90, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037000760087955
[32]
Seron, X., & Fayol, M. (1994). Number Transcoding by Children: A Functional Analysis. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1994.tb00635.x
[33]
Seron, X., Deloche, G., & Noel, M. P. (1991). Number Transcoding by Children: Writing Arabic Numbers under Dictation. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. P. Fisher (Eds.), Pathway to Number (pp. 245-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[34]
Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading Habits for Both Words and Numbers Contribute to the SNARC Effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 328-331. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
[35]
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[36]
Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Wang, L., & Wang, B. (2006). Kindergarten Children’s Representation and Understanding of Written Number Symbols. Early Childhood Development and Care, 176, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000302645
[37]
Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009). On the Language-Specificity of Basic Number Processing: Transcoding in a Language with Inversion and Its Relation to Working Memory Capacity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.003
