全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Challenges Faced by Primary School Teachers in Implementing the Automatic Promotion Policy at a School in the Zambezi Region

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2019.107123, PP. 1731-1744

Keywords: Automatic Promotion Policy, Retention, Culture of Entitlement, Achievement and Assessment Challenges

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Prior to independence in 1990,?learners were expected to meet all the pass requirements of a given grade before proceeding to the next grade level as a matter of policy. Learners who failed a grade were to repeat at the same or different school. In the case where parents of the learner chose to take their kid to a different school, such a learner was to go with a transfer letter, clearly stating the status of the learner, signed by the school principal or someone designated by him. It did not matter how many times the learner failed and repeated a grade. What was required is that each learner should meet the pass requirements of a grade before being allowed to proceed to the next grade. At independence, a new policy called automatic or social promotion was introduced in the education system of Namibia as part of the education reform. This policy, as the name suggests, requires a learner who failed a grade for the second time to be transferred or promoted to the next grade despite not having met the minimum pass requirements of that grade. The study employed a qualitative approach in order to gain insight into the issue being investigated. Data were collected by interviewing only those teachers who once taught or are currently teaching learners who were promoted automatically to their new grades. Data were analyzed by identifying salient themes and recurring ideas and classifying them into categories to make sense of the data. The study revealed that bullying other learners, poor academic performance of the promoted learners, truancy and lack of time to assist other learners were the major challenges primary school teachers at the selected school in the Zambezi Education Region face in implementing the automatic promotion policy.

References

[1]  Aggarwal, D. (2012). History and Development of Elementary Education in India. New Delhi: Sarup and Sons.
[2]  Aldridge, R., & Goldman, C. (1999). Prevalence of Social Promotion. New York: Bacon Prentice.
[3]  Corry, J. (2015). The Value of Education. Chronicle, 12, August 3.
[4]  Department of National Education (1980). National Assessment Policy for Schools in South West Africa. Windhoek: Government Print.
[5]  Department of National Education (1980). National Education Act, No. 30. Windhoek: Government Print.
[6]  De-Vos, A. (2004). Research at Grass Roots—For the Social Sciences and Human Service Professionals. Paarl: Paarl Print.
[7]  Ellis-Christensen, T. (2003). What Social Promotion Is.
http://wisegeek.com/what-is-social-prmotion.htm
[8]  Griffith, M. (2006). Social Promotion in Schools. New York: Atlanta Publishers.
[9]  Ken, S., & Rose, J. (2010). Ending Social Promotion. Philadelphia, PA: Palmer Press.
[10]  Koppensteiner, C. (2010). General Education Act of 1996. Brasilia: LDB.
[11]  Lamb, S. and Rice, S. (2008). Effective Intervention Strategies for Students at Risk of Early Leaving. Centre for Post-compulsory Education and Lifelong Learning The University of Melbourne.
http://samordningsforbund.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/06/rapport_university_of_melborne_080501.pdf
[12]  Lawrence-Turner, J. (2011). Social Promotion Puts Students on Rough Path: Passage Leaves Teachers, Parents with Tough Decisions to Make. The Spokesman Review.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/oct/16/a-pupils-right-of-passage/
[13]  Leckrone, M. (1999). Retention Realities and Educational Standards. Children and School, 54, 35-38.
[14]  Lynch, M. (2014). Alternatives to Social Promotion and Retention. Interchange, 44, 291-309.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9213-7
[15]  Mbumba, N., & Noise, P. (1988). Namibia in History. London: Zed Books.
[16]  Ministry of Education (1996). General Education Act. Sao Paolo: Government Printer.
[17]  Ministry of Education (2005). Requirements for Promotion of Learners in Grades 1-9 and 11 and Compulsory Compensatory Teaching. Okahandja: National Institute for Educational Development.
[18]  Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture (2004). Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality: SACMEQ II Report—A Study of the Conditions of Schooling and the Quality of Primary Education in Namibia. Blantyre: Government Print.
[19]  Muziransa, J. (2016). Retention vs. Promotion. New York: Government Printers.
[20]  N’thogan, C. (2012). Promotion and Upgrading in the Ghana Education Service.
http://www.modernghana.com/promotion-and-upgrading-in-the-ghana-education-service
[21]  NANSO (2009). NANSO’s Position on the Automatic Promotion Policy. Windhoek: NBC.
[22]  Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2008). Review of National Policies for Education—South Africa. Pretoria: Corrigenda.
[23]  Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. New York: SAGE.
[24]  Pupkewitz, H. (2006). On the Education Crisis. The Namibian, 31, March 7.
[25]  Rose, D. (2010). Childhood Bullying and Teasing: What School Personnel, and Other Professionals and Parents Can Do. Alexandria: American Counseling Association.
[26]  Scholar Europaea (2005). General Rules of the European Schools as Approved by the Board of the European Schools on 1st and 2nd February. Brussels.
[27]  Shilongo, E. (2004). A Historical Overview of Educational Assessment in Namibia (pp. 25-27). Windhoek: Reform Forum.
[28]  US Department of Education (1999). Re-Thinking Social Promotion Policy. Washington DC: Government Printers.
[29]  Westchester Institute for Human Services Research (1999). The Balanced View. Social Promotion and Retention.
[30]  Zeichner, K. (1996). Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133