|
- 2018
大学生心理素质问卷(简化版)的修编及信效度检验——基于双因子模型
|
Abstract:
本研究根据双因子模型在已有大学生心理素质问卷基础上进行修订。双因子模型因其在多维构念测量中的优势,被广泛应用于心理测验的编制和评估中。目前,已有研究运用双因子模型对中、小学生心理素质测量工具进行修订,且证明双因子模型的拟合结果最优。因此,为修订信效度较高的大学生心理素质问卷,使之更适于大学生群体的测量,本研究拟采用双因子模型对大学生心理素质测量工具进行修编和检验。从全国范围内选取18所高校先后两次进行了测量,修订后的问卷共包含27个题项,包括心理素质一般因子和认知品质、个性品质和适应能力三个特殊因子。通过比较传统三因子模型、单因素模型和二阶模型的数据拟合结果,双因子模型拟合结果最优,且信效度也都符合测量学标准,可作为大学生心理素质的测量工具。
This study is based on bifactor model and revised on the basis of the existing College Students' Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire. Bifactor model is widely used in the compilation and evaluation of psychological tests for its advantages in multidimensional construal measurement. At present, bifactor model has been used to revise psychological Suzhi measurement tools for middle school students and primary school students, and proves that the fitting of the bifactor model is the best. Therefore, in order to revise the College Students' Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire with high reliability and validity and make it more suitable for the measurement of college students, this study uses the bifactor model to revise and test the College Students' psychological Suzhi measurement tools. A total of 18 Chinese universities were selected to carry out two surveys. The final revised College Students' Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire consists of three subscales, including general factor (psychological Suzhi) and three special factors (cognitive quality, personality quality and adaptability). The bifactor model fits the data significantly better than both the single-factor model and second-order model, and the reliability and validity are also in conformity with the standard of measurement. It can be used as a measuring tool for college students' psychological Suzhi
[1] | EBESUTANI C, SMITH A, BERNSTEIN A, et al. A bifactor model of negative affectivity:Fear and distress components among younger and older youth[J]. Psychological assessment, 2011, 23(3): 679-691. DOI:10.1037/a0023234 |
[2] | 胡天强, 张大均, 程刚. 中学生心理素质问卷(简化版)的修编及信效度检验[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(2): 120-126. |
[3] | 潘彦谷, 张大均, 武丽丽. 小学生心理素质问卷的修订及验证——基于双因子模型[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(2): 127-133. |
[4] | DIENER E D, EMMONS R A, LARSEN R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale[J]. Journal of personality assessment, 1985, 49(1): 71-75. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 |
[5] | ZUNG W W. A self-rating depression scale[J]. Archives of general psychiatry, 1965, 12(1): 63-70. DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 |
[6] | 高美才. 大学生心理素质教育及行为管理探新——大学生心理压力调查的启示[J]. 中国校外教育(下旬刊), 2013(12): 52 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8502(x).2013.12.041 |
[7] | 罗品超. 大学生心理素质构成因素及其测量工具的研究[D]. 广州: 华南师范大学, 2005. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10574-2005081414.htm |
[8] | 龚玲. 大学生心理素质量表的修订[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2011. |
[9] | ZUNG W W. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders[J]. Psychosomatics, 1971, 12(6): 371-379. DOI:10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0 |
[10] | 王丽芳, 王志波. 父母婚姻关系对大学生心理素质的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2014, 22(7): 1083-1086. |
[11] | 樊富珉, 王建中. 北京大学生心理素质及心理健康研究[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2001, 4(4): 26-32. |
[12] | 王滔, 张大均, 陈建文. 大学生心理素质量表的编制[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 34(1): 122-127. |
[13] | REISE S P, MOORE T M, HAVILAND M G. Bifactor models and rotations:Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores[J]. Journal of personality assessment, 2010, 92(6): 544-559. DOI:10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 |
[14] | GOLAY P, LECERF T. Orthogonal higher order structure and confirmatory factor analysis of the French Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-Ⅲ)[J]. Psychological assessment, 2011, 23(1): 143-152. DOI:10.1037/a0021230 |
[15] | GIGNAC G E, WATKINS M W. Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV[J]. Multivariate behavioral research, 2013, 48(5): 639-662. DOI:10.1080/00273171.2013.804398 |
[16] | 张景焕, 张承芬, 常淑敏. 师范生心理素质评价量表的研制[J]. 心理科学, 2004, 27(2): 453-455. |
[17] | 张大均, 冯正直, 郭成, 等. 关于学生心理素质研究的几个问题[J]. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2000, 26(3): 56-62. |
[18] | 王滔. 大学生心理素质结构及其发展特点的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南师范大学, 2002. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10635-2002113160.htm |
[19] | 顾红磊, 温忠麟, 方杰. 双因子模型:多维构念测量的新视角[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(4): 973-979. |