|
- 2018
下层土壤厚度及容重对甘薯根系和块根质量的影响
|
Abstract:
为提高甘薯作物的产量和效益,探讨土壤容重和耕作层土壤厚度对甘薯产量和品质的影响,以期为甘薯生产提供指导.以渝薯6号为材料,采用二因素随机区组设计方法,盆栽模拟试验,分期测定甘薯块根的各项指标.研究分层设置土壤容重的处理方式对甘薯根系生长,块根产量及品质的影响.在底部土壤容重为1.6 g/cm3、下层土壤为8~32 cm的时候,淀粉含量达到最大值29.98%,极显著高于空白对照;在底部土壤容重为1.5 g/cm3,底层土壤厚度为16~32 cm时,块根质量最大(为0.68 kg).试验结果表明,过高的土壤容重会造成SOD活性、MDA含量、淀粉含量增加,但不利于产量增加;下层土壤厚度减少有利于甘薯产量的提高,却不利于淀粉累积.
In order to improve the yield and benefit of sweet potato crops, the effects of soil bulk density and soil thickness on the yield and quality of sweet potato were discussed, so as to provide guidance for sweet potato production. Tthis experiment took Yu Shu No. 6 as material, using two factors random area group design method, pot simulation test, and the determination of various indexes of sweet potato root tuber by stages. The effects of different treatments of soil bulk density on root growth, root yield and quality of sweet potato were studied. [results] when the soil bulk density at the bottom was 1.6 g/cm3 and the lower soil was 8-32 cm, the starch content reached the maximum 29.98%, which was significantly higher than that of the blank control. When the bottom soil bulk density is 1.5 g/cm3 and the underlying soil thickness is 16-32 cm, the root weight is the maximum (0.68 kg). The results showed that the high soil bulk density would increase the activity of SOD, MDA content and starch content, but not increase the yield. The decrease of the lower soil thickness is beneficial to the increase of sweet potato yield, but not to the accumulation of starch
[1] | 刘晚苟, 李良贤, 谢海容, 等. 土壤容重对野生香根草幼苗根系形态及其生物量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 21(4): 214-220. |
[2] | 尚庆文, 徐坤, 孔祥波, 等. 土壤容重对生姜生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2006(11): 18-20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2006.11.007 |
[3] | 崔晓明, 张亚如, 张晓军, 等. 土壤紧实度对花生根系生长和活性变化的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(6): 131-136. DOI:10.7668/hbnxb.2016.06.021 |
[4] | 吴亚维, 马锋旺, 邹养军. 土壤紧实度对楸子幼苗根系生长及活力的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(3): 118-120. |
[5] | 孙曰波, 赵兰勇, 张玲. 土壤紧实度对玫瑰幼苗生长及根系氮代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(9): 1775-1780. |
[6] | 王德玉, 孙艳, 郑俊鶱, 等. 土壤紧实胁迫对黄瓜根系生长及氮代谢的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5): 1394-1400. |
[7] | 王玉萍, 周晓洁, 卢潇, 等. 土壤紧实度对马铃薯根系、匍匐茎、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(6): 1590-1596. |
[8] | LOGSDON S D, KARLEN D L. Bulk Density as a Soil Quality Indicator during Conversion to No-Tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004, 78(2): 143-149. DOI:10.1016/j.still.2004.02.003 |
[9] | 王文质, 以凡, 杜述荣, 等. 甘薯淀粉含量换算公式及换算表[J]. 作物学报, 1989, 15(1): 94-96. |
[10] | 生利霞, 冯立国, 束怀瑞. 不同土壤紧实度对平邑甜茶根系特征及氮代谢的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2009, 26(5): 593-596. |
[11] | 王慧杰, 郝建平, 冯瑞云, 等. 微孔深松耕降低土壤紧实度提高棉花产量与种籽品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(8): 7-14. |
[12] | 史春余, 王振林, 余松烈. 土壤通气性对甘薯产量的影响及其生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(2): 173-178. |
[13] | 李潮海, 梅沛沛, 王群, 等. 下层土壤容重对玉米植株养分吸收和分配的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(7): 1371-1378. |
[14] | 左宇. 岩生植物金发草生长发育对土壤厚度和水分的响应[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2006. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y994466 |
[15] | 窦俊辉, 喻树迅, 范术丽, 等. SOD与植物胁迫抗性[J]. 分子植物育种, 2010, 8(2): 359-364. |