全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

两种通畅锉疏通上颌磨牙MB2的根管偏移及效率的对比研究
Canal Transportation and Efficiency of Two Kinds of Files to Prepare the MB2 of Maxillary Molar.

DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.12.013

Keywords: 通畅锉,上颌磨牙,根管偏移,根管疏通,
Glide path files
,Maxillary molar,Canal transportation,Root canal preparation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 目的: 比较ProGlider和PathFile疏通上颌磨牙MB2根管偏移及效率。方法: 120颗离体上颌磨牙,CBCT筛选出具有MB2的牙齿63颗,开髓后探查MB2,纳入42颗上颌磨牙,随机分别用ProGlider和PathFile疏通,记录每颗牙疏通时间。CBCT评价疏通前后距根尖3 mm、5 mm、7 mm及根管偏离中心第一点(b点)处的偏移量及轴中心率。结果: ProGlider组疏通时间显著短于PathFile。在距根尖3 mm、7 mm处根管偏移量无显著差异;在距根尖5 mm处和b点处,ProGlider组少于PathFile组。在距根尖3 mm、5 mm、7 mm处轴中心率,两组间无显著差异;在b点处,ProGlider组显著优于PathFile组。结论: ProGlider及PathFile均能高效疏通上颌磨牙MB2,均有较好中心定位能力,ProGlider在根管弯曲处成形能力优于PathFile

References

[1]  Betancourt P, Navarro P, Cantín M, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of prevalence and location of MB2 canal in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(6)∶9128-9134
[2]  Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of PathFile and ProGlider pathfinding nickel-titanium rotary instruments [J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(9)∶894-901
[3]  Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of several glide path techniques and ProTaper Next shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals [J]. Int Endod J, 2017, 50(4)∶387-397
[4]  Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography [J]. J Endod, 1996, 22(7)∶369-375
[5]  韩怡,白雨豪,侯晓玫.机用镍钛通畅锉在模拟根管中成形能力的对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2018,34(2)∶121-124
[6]  Zhang Y, Xu H, Wang D, et al. Assessment of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary first molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study [J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(12)∶1990-1996
[7]  Ratanajirasut R, Panichuttra A, Panmekiate S. A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second permanent molars in a thai population [J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(1)∶56-61
[8]  Betancourt P, Navarro P, Cantín M, et al.Cone-beam computed tomography study of prevalence and location of MB2 canal in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(6)∶9128-9134
[9]  Cassim I, van der Vyver PJ. Influence of glide path preparation on the canal shaping times of waveone gold in curved mandibular molar canals [J]. J Endod,2018,44(5)∶853-855
[10]  Gunes B, Yesildal Yeter K. Effects of different glide path files on apical debris extrusion in curved root canals [J]. J Endod,2018,44(7)∶1191-1194
[11]  Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ.Glide path enlargement of mandibular molar canals by using K-files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: A comparative study of the preparation times [J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(4)∶609-612
[12]  Plotino G, Ahmed HM, Grande NM, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: A comprehensive review--Part Ⅱ: properties and effectiveness [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(12)∶1939-1950
[13]  Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2)∶271-275
[14]  Paleker F, van der Vyver PJ. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of K-files, ProGlider File, and G-Files: a micro-computed tomography study of curved root canals [J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(7)∶1105-1109
[15]  童方丽,谢成婕,陈蕾.X线结合锥束CT检测上颌磨牙遗漏根管的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2014,30(12)∶1179-1182
[16]  Kirchhoff AL, Chu R, Mello I, et al. Glide path management with single- and multiple-instrument rotary systems in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11)∶1880-1883

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133