After considerable growth over the last two decades in e-learning, graduate programs show a steady increase in the availability of online courses, trending ahead of baccalaureate and doctoral programs. Education leaders agree that e-learning is essential to key stakeholders including higher education institutions and the students they serve, yet there is limited research demonstrating what best practices graduate-level online programs should adopt. The aim of this narrative systematic review was to investigate the best pedagogical practices in graduate online learning.？Multiple databases were used in the search with a date range from 1995-2017, corresponding with the period of substantial growth in this industry. After reviewing title abstracts, of 132 studies, forty-two were included and analyzed. After conducting our systematic review, we found the best pedagogical practices associated with achieving the most significant educational outcomes for online graduate students include positive academic attitude towards online education, and timely, consistent teacher-student communication.
References
[1]
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Learning in the United States. The Sloan Consortium.
http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/staying-the-course.pdf
[2]
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC.
http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf
[3]
Betts, K. (2017). The Growth of Online Learning: How Universities Must Adjust to the New Norm. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
https://www.educationdive.com/news/the-growth-of-online-learning-how-universities-must-adjust-to-the-new-norm/433632/
[4]
Evans, N. S. (2013). A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Learning Effectiveness in Face-to-Face and Online Courses. PhD Dissertation, New Castle, DE: Wilmington University.
[5]
Groeling, J. P. (2004). Does Technology Make a Difference in the Classroom? A Comparison of Online and Traditional Courses Employing Models of Competence and Uses and Gratifications. PhD Dissertation, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
[6]
Hamrick, S. M. (2004). A Theory and Behavior-Based Analysis on the Nature of Situational and Interactive Influences on Online Students’ Perceptions of Motivation. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Regent University.
[7]
Hegngi, Y. N. (1997). Online Teaching and Learning: A Description of the Development of the Media Technology and Diversity Online Course and Its Electronic Discourse Analysis. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
[8]
Henckell, M. M. (2007). Evaluating Distance Education: The Student Perspective. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Missouri-Columbia.
[9]
Holland, J. L. (2006). Engaging Students at High Cognitive Levels in Peer-Mentored Online Discussions. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Emporia State University.
[10]
Hwu, S. (2011). Concerns and Professional Development Needs of University Faculty in Adopting Online Learning. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Kansas State University.
[11]
Ice, P. R. (2006). The Relationship between Technical Support and Pedagogical Guidance Provided to Faculty and Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: West Virginia University.
[12]
Kahrhoff, J. B. (2005). Exploring the Relationship between Adult Development and Support Service Needs of Online Graduate Students. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Missouri-St. Louis.
[13]
Keeler, L. C. (2006). Student Satisfaction and Types of Interaction in Distance Education Courses. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Colorado State University.
[14]
Kim, W. (2015). Learning Flow, Motivation, and Community of Inquiry in an Online Graduate Degree Program. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Purdue University.
[15]
Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., Joksimovic, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of Communities of Inquiry: Effects of Learning Technology Use on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002
[16]
Kumar, S. (2014). Signature Pedagogy, Implementation and Evaluation of an Online Program That Impacts Educational Practice. Internet and Higher Education, 21, 60-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.11.001
[17]
Kuna, A. S. (2012). Learner Interaction Patterns and Student Perceptions toward Using Selected Tools in an Online Course Management System. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Iowa State University.
[18]
Levinson, C. C. (2012). Factors That Influence the Ability of Preservice Teachers to Apply English Language Arts Pedagogy in Guided Practice. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Southern California.
[19]
Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The Role of Emotion in the Learning Process: Comparisons between Online and Face-to-Face Learning Settings. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.001
[20]
Maryannakis, A. (2009). Effectiveness of Objectivist Online Instruction on Graduate Learners’ Knowledge and Competence. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Capella University.
[21]
Merena, P. S. (2006). Increasing Retention in Online Distance Education Courses. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Delaware.
[22]
Mozzani-Miller, P. (2006). A Comparison of Learning Experienced by Students Who Work On-Line Versus Students Who Work Off-line in Distance Education Graduate Courses: A Mixed Method Study. PhD Dissertation, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
[23]
Occupytheory.org (2014). Advantages and Disadvantages of Qualitative Research.
http://occupytheory.org/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-qualitative-research/
Online Learning Consortium (2016). Report: One in Four Students Enrolled in Online Courses.
https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/news_item/report-one-four-students-enrolled-online-courses/
[26]
Pattison, A. B. (2017). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Faculty Social Presence and Online Graduate Student Achievement, Satisfaction, and Persistence. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Grand Canyon University.
[27]
Rajasingham, L. (2011). New Challenges Facing Universities in the Internet-Driven Global Environment. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ936391
[28]
Randle, D. E. (2013). An Analysis of Interactions and Outcomes Associated with an Online Professional Development Course for Science Teachers. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Columbia University.
[29]
Ruhlandt, R. R. (2010). Differences in Retention, Social Presence, Cognitive Presence, and Teaching Presence in Fully Online and Blended Courses. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Regent University.
[30]
Ruiz, D. M. (2007). Traditional or Distance: A Comparative Examination of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Cincinnati.
[31]
SJSU.edu (2017). Literature Review versus Systematic Review.
http://libguides.sjsu.edu/c.php?g=230370&p=1528399
[32]
Wang, Y.-J. (2007). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Internet-Based Distance Education. PhD Dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Texas A&M University.
