This study investigated the distribution and effectiveness of distance learning models in selected higher education institutions in Cameroon. The specific objectives of the study were: (1) to identify the distance learning models currently in use in higher education worldwide, (2) to identify and describe the models currently used in selected Cameroon higher education institutions, and (3) to assess the effectiveness with which each institution applies its distance learning model. The design of the study was a survey, based on the cross-section survey. The participants in this study were made up of 97 respondents from Distance Learning (DL) programmes in the universities of Buea, Douala, Dschang and Yaounde I. Data were collected from literature and a close ended questionnaire, designed using the Likert method. Content analysis was carried out through literature review. The design facilitated a comparison of indicators among the distance learning programmes of the four institutions concerned. The quantitative data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 17.0 (SPSS Inc. 2008). Descriptive statistics were used to present the distribution of subjects between and within subsets using frequencies, proportions, cross tabulations and Multiple Responses Analysis. The results of the study indicate that in general terms, higher education institutions worldwide use at least seven models in distance learning programmes. Cameroon higher education institutions on their part are using mainly the Multi-media, and the Telelearning models of distance learning. In relation to effectiveness, all the distance learning programmes are reported to be satisfactorily providing students with pre-registration information, information relating to the content of courses, and motivational strategies that reduce the student dropout rate. However, students in all the distance learning programmes reported dissatisfaction with interaction.
References
[1]
Briner, M. (1990). Constructivism: The Theories.
http://curriculum.calstatela.edu/faculty/psparks/theorists//500const.htm
[2]
Brown, J. S., Collins A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Education Researcher, 18, 32-42.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
[3]
Dirr, P. J. (1999). Putting Principles into Practice; Promoting Effective Support Services for Students in Distance learning Programs; a Report on the Findings of a Survey. Project funded in the U.S. Department of Education’s Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. http://www.wcet.info/project/studentservices
[4]
Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical Challenges for Distance learning in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, No 1.
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/2/333
[5]
Holmberg, B. (1989).Theory and Practice of Distance Learning. London: Routledge.
[6]
Koul, B. N., Valicha, K., & Murugan, K. (2000). Growth and Philosophy of Distance Education. New Delhi: Berry Art Press.
[7]
Lave, J., (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. In J. Lave, & E. Wenger (Eds.), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Moore, M. (1990). Recent Contributions to the Theory of Distance Education. Open Learning, 5, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051900050303
[9]
Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance Learning Theory. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 5, 1-6.
[10]
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Learning: A Systems View. New York: Wadsworth.
[11]
Norman, D. (1993). Things that Make Us Smart. New York: Addison Wesley.
[12]
Tait, A. (2000). Planing Student Support for Open and Distance Learning. Open Larning, 15, No. 3.
[13]
Peters, O. (1994). Introduction. In D. Keega (Ed.), Otto Peters on Distance Education: The Industrialization of Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-23). London: Routledge.
[14]
Peters, O. (n.d.). Concepts and Models of Open and Distance Learning.
http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/found/peter98b.htm
[15]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge M.A: Harvard University Press.
[16]
Wedemeyer, C. A. (1971). Independent Study. In R. Deighton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education IV (pp. 548-557). New York: McMillan.
[17]
Wedemeyer, C. A. (1977). Independent Study. In A. S. Knowles (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
