Serology is the foundation
of any brucellosis control and eradication program worldwide, thus it is
important to define accuracy diagnostics assays and cut-off of those assays, due to variations from country
to country and even among specific areas in the country. The variation of
cutoff values depended on: prevalence of disease, vaccination status, animal
management, and control and eradication programs. Therefore, a cut-off for the diagnosis of bovine
brucellosis through fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) in Carchi—Ecuador was
determined. The survey has been carried out in Carchi province of Ecuador, who
is considered a province of high prevalence of brucellosis and the vaccination
status is unknown due to the lack of
registers. Sera samples (n=200)
were obtained from individual cows from randomly selected herds. Blood sera
were tested through Fluoresce Polarization Assay (FPA) and competitive
enzyme-linked inmunosorbent assay (cELISA) as confirmatory test, and then receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
analysis was done. The sensitivity and specificity values of FPA were 88.7% and 92.50% respectively using a cut-off of 89.90 mP. Moreover, the area under the curve showed
that 92.2% is the probability accuracy of the test.The advantage of the FPA is that it is a test with good
References
[1]
Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal. OIE. Chapter 2.1.4.Brucellosis (Brucela aboruts, B. melitensis, B. suis). París, Francia, OIE. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.01.04_BRUCELLOSIS.pdf
[2]
Corbel, M. (2006) Brucellosis in Humans and Animals. WHO-FAO-OIE, Geneva.
[3]
Agencia Ecuatoriana de Aseguramiento de la Calidad del Agro. AGROCALIDAD (2009) Programa Nacional de Control de Brucelosis Bovina. AGROCALIDAD, Ecuador.
[4]
Schoonjans, F., Zalata, A., Depuydt, C. and Comhaire, F. (1995) MedCalc: A New Computer Program for Medical Statistics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 48, 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01703-8
[5]
Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Servicio Ecuatoriano de Sanidad Agropecuaria. MAG-SESA (1999) Prevención y control de la brucelosis bovina en Ecuador. MAG-SESA, Ecuador.
[6]
Gobierno Provincial del Carchi. GPC (2013) Carchi-Prioridades para el Desarrollo, Agenda 2013-2020. GPC, Carchi, Ecuador.
[7]
Ibarra, M. (2013) Evaluaciòn comparativa de pruebas diagnòsticas en leche para brucelosis en el Norte del Ecuador. Sathiri, 4, 279-293.
[8]
Agencia Ecuatoriana de Aseguramiento de la Calidad del Agro. AGROCALIDAD (2015) Campana de vacunación Fiebre Aftosa. AGROCALIDAD, Ecuador.
[9]
Nielsen, K. and Gall, D. (2001) Fluorescence Polarization Assay for the Diagnosis of Brucellosis: A Review. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, 22, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1081/IAS-100104705
[10]
Nielsen, K., Gall, D., Jolley, M., Leishman, G., Balsevicius, S., Smith, P., Nicoletti, P. and Thomas, F. (1996) A Homogeneous Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Detection of Antibody to Brucella abortus. Journal of Immunological Methods, 195, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(96)00116-0
[11]
Nielsen, K., Smith, P., Gall, D., Perez, B., Samartino, L., Nicoletti, P., Dajer, A., Rojas, X. and Kelly, W. (2001) Validation of the Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Detection of Milk Antibody to Brucella abortus. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, 22, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1081/IAS-100104706
[12]
Ron, J. (2003) Validación de Técnicas Diagnósticas para la Detección de Brucelosis y Estudio Epidemiológico en una Región Andina del Ecuador. Master’s Thesis, Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Tropical Animal Health Department, Belgium.
[13]
McGiven, J.A., Tucker, J.D., Perrett, L.L., Stack, J.A., Brew, S.D. and MacMillan, A.P. (2003) Validation of FPA and cELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Brucella abortus in Cattle Sera and Comparison to SAT, CFT, AND ELISA. Journal of Immunological Methods, 278, 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00201-1
[14]
Hanley, J. and McNEil, B. (1982) The Meaning and Use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747