Monitoring in the Ca?apava do Sul campus, Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), intends to provide the development in academical activities and techniques inside the Geoscience field, in subjects offered in the curricula of Geophysics, Geology and Environmental and Sanitary Engineering programs. It is a student activity in which helping the teacher to intensify and assure the cooperation between the students and the monitor into the classroom and also in the basic activities on the University related to Teaching, Research and Extension is the main purpose. Therefore, it is possible to intensify the awareness of group importance in knowledge in general, as well as the familiarity with the differences, with conceptual contents, behaviour and proposed activities that are offered to develop in each student the responsibilities itself and with everybody else, always emphasizing the importance of working in a group. Teaching is inseparably related to learning. The goals are the development of conceptual abilities and classroom and laboratory techniques, as well as in extracurricular activities, in order to arouse in the students their interests about the subjects addressed. The main objective of monitoring work is to learn, not only learning about the subject, but also contents related to some procedures, preparing, experiment and, in the matter of fact, everything that is related to the knowledge about living and discussing in a group. Therefore, it is believed that the student/ monitor should live this experience provided by teaching and integrate the practical experiences in his formation, in addition and as an improvement of his program.
References
[1]
Abramowicz, M. (2001). The Împortance of Reflective Teacher Training Groups within University Courses. In: M. E. Castanho, & S. Castanho (Eds.), Themes and Texts in Methodology of Higher Education (pp. 1-10). Campinas: Papirus.
[2]
Apelo, C. A. J., & Postma, D. (2005). Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution (2nd ed., pp. 137-142). Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833544
[3]
Baird, M., & Cann, M. (2011). Environmental Chemistry (4th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
[4]
Charlot, B. (2005). Relationship with Knowledge, Teacher Training and Globalization. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
[5]
Gill, R. (2015). Chemical Fundamentals of Geology and Environmental Geoscience (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[6]
Grotzinger, J., & Jordan, T. (2013). To Understand the Earth (6th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
[7]
Isaia, S. M. A., & Bolzan, D. P. V. (2007). Formative Trajectories of Teachers Who Work in the Licentiate. Proceedings of the 4th Higher Education Symposium: Professional Teacher Development and 1st Forum of Researchers in Higher Education. Santa Maria: UFSM, CD Room.
[8]
Kearey, P., Klepeis, K. A., & Vine, F. J. (2014). Global Tectonics (8th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
[9]
Kuenzer, A. Z. (2001). What Changes in the Daily Life of the University Classroom with the Changes in the World of Work. In: M. E. Castanho, & S. Castanho (Eds.), Themes and Texts in Methodology of Higher Education (pp. 15-29). Campinas: Papirus.
[10]
Masetto, M. (2001). Pedagogical Activities in the Daily Life of the University Classroom: Reflections and Practical Suggestions. In: M. E. Castanho, & S. Castanho (Eds.), Themes and Texts in Methodology of Higher Education (pp. 83-102). Campinas: Papirus.
[11]
Pomerol, C., Lagabrielle, Y., Renard, M., & Guillot, S. (2013). Principles of Geology: Techniques, Models and Theories (11th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
[12]
Rosa, A. H., Fraceto, L. F., & Moschini-Carlos, V. (2014). Environment and Sustainability. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
[13]
Sacristan, J. G. (1995). Consciousness and Action on the Practice of Professional Liberation of Teachers. In: A. Nóvoa (Ed.), Occupation Teacher (2nd ed., pp. 72-122). Porto: Porto Editora.
[14]
Severino, A. J. (2007). Methodology of Scientific Work (13th ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.
[15]
Teixeira, W., Fairchild, T., Toledo, C., & Taioli, F. (2015). Deciphering the Earth (4th ed.). Brasília: IBEP NACIONAL.
