全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Classroom Analysis of a Packed Bed Reactor with and without the Use of Effectiveness Factor

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2016.715209, PP. 2094-2106

Keywords: Classroom Teaching, Effectiveness Factor, Chemical Reactor Engineering

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Classroom analysis of a packed bed reactor with and without the use of effectiveness factor (η) is discussed in this article. The use of (η) in the calculation of an isothermal packed bed reactor with convection and first-order reaction rate is analyzed. An analytical model has been developed with and without (η). The model without (η) was presented in a 50-min lecture and later used in a 50-min computational laboratory session with various groups of two students to calculate the length and catalyst mass in a packed bed reactor. In another class, the students calculated the model using (η). Four or five class activities were tested every month in pairs of students in the place of traditional exams. A questionnaire was prepared to verify the students’ level of difficulty in understanding two theoretical topics taught in the last two classes, difficulty in doing the requested calculations, as well as among calculations using the effectiveness factor and without it. We have included a question in the questionnaire on how the students felt about the elimination of one traditional monthly exam in Chemical Reactor Design. In the two semesters when the questionnaire was applied to the Chemical Reactor Design class, on average, 86% of the students preferred various class group activities as opposed to traditional exams, 80% of the students reported that they had little difficulty in understanding the two theoretical sections in the last two classes, 57% stated that they did not have any difficulty in doing the requested calculations and 51% reported that the calculation methods with the use of (η) and without its use were somewhat similar.

References

[1]  Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., & Lightfoot, E. (2002). Transport Phenomena. New York: Wiley.
[2]  Cartaxo, S. J. M., Silvino, P. F. G., & Fernandes, F. A. N. (2014). Transient Analysis of Shell-and- Tube Heat Exchangers Using an Educational Software. Education for Chemical Engineering, 9, e77-e84.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2014.05.001

[3]  Dahm, K., & Hesketh, R. (2008). Two Experiments for the Introductory Chemical Reaction Engineering Course. Education for Chemical Engineering, 3, e1-e5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2007.07.001

[4]  Fogler, H. S. (1992). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (2cd ed.). London: Prentice-Hall.
[5]  Fogler, H. S. (2006). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (4th ed.). Boston: Prentice-Hall.
[6]  Froment, G. F., Bischoff, K. B., & Wilde, J. (2011). Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
[7]  Ganley, J. C. (2015). A Homogeneous Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design Laboratory: The Reaction Kinetics of Dye and Bleach. Education for Chemical Engineering, 12, 20-26.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2015.06.005

[8]  Glassey, J., Novakovic, K., & Parr, M. (2013). Enquiry Based Learning in Chemical Engineering Curriculum Supported by Computer Aided Delivery. Education for Chemical Engineering, 8, e87-e93.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2013.06.003

[9]  Luzi, C. D., Bressa, S. P., Mazza, G. D., & Barreto, G. F. (2014). A Supporting Formulation for Introducing Gas-Liquid Reactions. Education for Chemical Engineering, 9, e50-e66.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2014.04.001

[10]  Mahecha-Botero, A., Reaume, S., Grace, J. R., & Ellis, N. (2011). Independent Research as a Teaching Tool in Graduate Chemical Reaction Engineering. Case Study: Modelling Isomerization of Unsaturated Fatty Acids with Catalyst Deactivation. Education for Chemical Engineering, 6, e1-e9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2010.09.002

[11]  Regalado-Méndez, A., Cid-Rodríguez, M. R. P., & Báez-González, J. G. (2010). Problem Based Learning (PBL): Analysis of Continuous Stirred Tank Chemical Reactors with a Process Control Approach. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 1, 54-73.
[12]  Stammitti, A. (2013). Spreadsheets for Assisting Transport Phenomena Laboratory Experiences. Education for Chemical Engineering, 8, e58-e71.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2013.02.005

[13]  Thiele, E. W. (1939). Relation between Catalytic Activity and Size of Particle. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 31, 916-920.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50355a027

[14]  Yamané, T., Araki, S., & Sada, E. (1981). Overall Effectiveness Factor Incorporating Partition Coefficient of Gel-Immobilized Enzyme Pellet. Journal of Fermentation Technology, 59, 367- 374.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133