Environment induced decoherence, and other quantum processes, have been proposed in the literature to explain the apparent spontaneous selection—out of the many mathematically eligible bases—of a privileged measurement basis that corresponds to what we actually observe. This paper describes such processes, and demonstrates that—contrary to common belief—no such process can actually lead to a preferred basis in general. The key observation is that environment induced decoherence implicitly assumes a prior independence of the observed system, the observer and the environment. However, such independence cannot be guaranteed, and we show that environment induced decoherence does not succeed in establishing a preferred measurement basis in general. We conclude that the existence of the preferred basis must be postulated in quantum mechanics, and that changing the basis for a measurement is, and must be, described as an actual physical process.
References
[1]
Zurek, W.H. (1981) Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1516-1525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516
[2]
Zurek, W.H. (1991) Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical. Physics Today, 44, 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881293
[3]
Zurek, W.H. (2002) Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revi-sited. Los Alamos Science, 27, 2-25.
[4]
Schlosshauer, M. (2005) Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1267-1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267
[5]
Zeh, H.D. (1970) On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics, 1, 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656
[6]
Wang, T. and Hobill, D. (2014) Is the Preferred Basis Selected by the Environment? arXiv:quant-ph/1412.2852
[7]
Zurek, W.H. (1981) Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1519, Section III. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516
[8]
Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, Article ID: 195200.
[9]
Inamori, H. (2016) Is Independent Choice Possible? Journal of Quantum Information Science, 6, 39-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2016.61005
[10]
Mintert, F., Vinviescas, C. and Buchleitner, A. (2009) Basic Concepts of Entangled States. Lecture Notes in Physics, 768, 61-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88169-8_2