All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Experiences in Academic Literacy with MOOC

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2016.713186, PP. 1834-1850

Keywords: Higher Education, Academic Literacy, Digital Technology

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Academic literacy is defined as a student having developed the skills and competencies related to the appropriation of writing inserted in the social practices and with the possibility to build and rebuild concepts and meanings. There are various studies that focus on the difficulties of university students in relation to the mother tongue, which highlights the importance of proposing and evaluating new processes and strategies geared towards academic literacy. This study aims to analyze the possibilities and limit of the use of technology as a support to the mediation process, interaction and dialogicity within structured didactic proposals in a closed and open virtual learning environment (MOOC), aiming at academic literacy. The theoretical premises of Feuerstein, Feuerstein, & Falik (2014) and Bakhtin (2010), especially in relation to the concepts of mediation, interactionism and dialogism, support two developed training proposals, tested and evaluated by teachers and graduate students, using the methodological referrals of research development (Van der Maren, 2003). In the first model, in a closed platform, a didactic sequence structured in a virtual learning environment was transposed. Only one of the activities (radioweb) was opened. It was observed that the lack of familiarity with the environment, as well as its formal organization and the lack of diversification of learning activities, can demotivate the student in the literacy process. This experience has given evidence of the importance of the use of resources that favor a more constant feedback to the student, allowing them to create their own pace of learning. Through the second model, which follows the assumptions of the construction of a MOOC, it can be inferred that the diversity in integrating technologies can offer conditions for self-learning, interaction and cooperation between pairs, with the goal of making the learning of the Portuguese language and academic genres more significant.


[1]  Antunes, I. (2003). Portuguese Classes: Meeting and Interaction (8th ed.). Sao Paulo: Parábola.
[2]  Araújo, G. M. L., Careno, M. F., Luna, M. J. M., & Leal, M. V. (2005). Linguistic Competence of University Students and the Degree of Understanding and Texts Production: The Sociological Dialing. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting da SBPC, Fortaleza, 57.
[3]  Bakhtin, M. (2010). Marxism and Philosophy of Language (14th ed.). Sao Paulo: HUCITEC.
[4]  Bardin, L. (2010). Content Analysis. Translation Luís Antero Reto e Augusto Pinheiro. Lisboa: Edicoes.
[5]  Brasil (1997). Ministério da Educacao. National Curriculum Guidelines: Portuguese. Brasília: MEC.
[6]  Cunha, M. I., Zanchet, B. B. A., & Ribeiro, G. M. (2013). Undergraduate Teaching Quality: Culture, Values and Selection of Professors. Práxis Educativa, 8, 219-242.

[7]  de Dallegrave, J. L. M., & Vosgerau, D. S. R. (2014). Mediation Process to the Necessary Writing Skills in Academic Context with Digital Media and Technologies. Curitiba: Dissertacao (Mestrado)-Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná.

[8]  Elias, V. M. (2011). Teaching Portuguese Language: Speaking, Writing and Reading. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
[9]  Eneau, J. (2008). From Autonomy to Reciprocity, or Vice Versa? French Personalism’s Contribution to a New Perspective on Self-Directed Learning. Adult Education Quarterly.

[10]  Eneau, J., & Develotte, C. (2012). Working Online Together to Enhance Learner Autonomy. ReCALL, 24, 3-19.


[11]  Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., & Falik, L. H. (2014). Beyond Intelligence: Mediated Learning and the Brain Habillity to Change. Petrópolis: Vozes.
[12]  Gomez, A. P. (1992). The Practical Thinking Teacher-Training of the Teacher as Reflective Practitioner. In A. Nóvoa (Ed.), The Teachers and Their Training (pp. 95-114). Lisboa: Publicacoes Dom Quixote, Instituto de Inovacao Educacional.
[13]  Kenski, V. M. (2003). Technologies, Traditional and Distance Learning. Campinas: Papirus.
[14]  Koch, I. G. V. (2002). The Textual Cohesion. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
[15]  Marcuschi, L. A. (2003). Conversation Analysis. Sao Paulo: ática.
[16]  Nicola, R. M. S. (2011). Retextualization and Language Concepts in the Formation of the Reader. In Proceedings of the Nacional Education Congress.
[17]  Paiva, V. L. M. O. (2012). E-Mail: A New Text Genre. In L. A. Marcuschi, & A. C. Xavier (Org.), Hypertext and Digital Genres New Forms of Construction of Meaning (3rd ed.). Sao Paulo: Cortez.
[18]  Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2004). Virtual Student. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
[19]  Santos, E. O., & Riccio, N. C. R. (2011). Open Courseware Design: An Online Education Experience on Teacher Training in UFBA. In D. M. V. Barros, et al. (Eds.), Education and Technologies: Reflection, Innovation and Practices. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta de Lisboa.
[20]  Schneuwly, B., & Dolz, J. (2011). Oral and Written Genres in School (3rd ed.). Campinas: Mercado das Letras.
[21]  Silva, M. (2006). Interactive Classroom (4th ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Quartet.
[22]  Travaglia, L. A. (2000). Grammar and Interaction: Proposal for Grammar Teaching in Elementary and High School (5th ed.). Sao Paulo: Cortez.
[23]  Van der Maren, J. M. (2003). Methódes de recherche pour l’education. Montréal: De Boeck Université.
[24]  Zabalza, M. A. (2004). University Education: Scenery and Protagonists. Porto Alegre: Artmed.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal