The culture of learning that defines Web Society converges to the construction of a new educational model, featured by the diversity and plurality of individuals. However, the normality standards are socially established accentuate the problem that stigmatizes the universe of deficiency, which relates it to incapacity or ineffectiveness. The objective of this article is to comprehend the learning processes circumscribed to the universe of people with hearing and visual impairments along with people without deficiencies. Therefore, it is utilized by the qualitative research supported by the Focus Group technique. Based on the Situated Cognition Theory and Jungian Symbolic Pedagogy, the participants’ perceptions are analyzed in three different focal groups. It is possible to reframe the concept of inclusion by indicating that learning difficulties are not directly connected to the deficiency, but indeed come from the shadow formed in unconsciousness. The inclusive proposals must overcome the paradigm of dominantly rational learning and include wider dimensions that also form the totality of being.
References
[1]
Acomm, A. (2009). Tutor, Instant Messaging and Whiteboard Tool. http://www.atutor.ca/acomm/
[2]
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
[3]
Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2006) Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases. Pearson: Harlow. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[4]
Behar, P. A. (2009). Constructing Pedagogical Models for E-Learning. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
[5]
Byington, C. A. (2010). Interview Made in Sao Paulo/SP, September.
[6]
Byington, C. A. (2003). The Loving Construction of Knowledge: The Foundation and Purpose of Jungian Symbolic Education. Sao Paulo: Religare
[7]
Boisot, M. H. (1995). Information Space: Framework for Learning in Organizations: Institutions and Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
[8]
Camargo, D. (2007). Jung and Morin: Critique of the Modern Subject and Education (Title Adapted). Sao Paulo: Xama.
[9]
Dotter, F. (2009). Hearing Impaired—Terminologies, Identities and Education. SWS-Rundschau, 49, 347-368.
[10]
Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International Trends in Inclusive Education: The Continuing Challenge to Teach Each One and Everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23, 109-120. www.scopus.com/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856250801946236
[11]
Fialho, F. A. P. (2011). Psychology of Mental Activities: Introduction to Cognitive Sciences (Title Adapted). Florianópolis: Editora Insular.
[12]
Gatti, B. A. (2005) Focus Group in Research in Social and Human Sciences (Title Adapted). Brasília: Líber Livro Editora.
[13]
Kauffman, J. M., & Hung, L.Y. (2009). Special Education for Intellectual Disability: Current Trends and Perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 452-456. www.scopus.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e32832eb5c3
[14]
Klaus, J. (2004). Living, Teaching and Learning at Any Time and at Any Place. E-Learning-Opportunities and Barriers for Visually Impaired Students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3118, 151-156. www.scopus.com
[15]
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction between Research Participants. So- ciology of Health and Illness, 16, 103-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
[16]
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268
[17]
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
[18]
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1997). Of Machines and Living Creatures. Autopoiesis, Organization of Living (Title adapted). Porto Alegre: ArtesMédicas.
[19]
Morgan, G. (2005). Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 45, 58-71.
[20]
Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to Use Focus Groups and Why. In: D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art (pp. 3-9). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008.n1
[21]
Oliveira, M. K. (1992). Vygotsky: Some Misunderstandings in the Interpretation of His Thoughts (Title adapted). Cadernos de Pesquisa, 81, 67-74.
[22]
Obregon, R. de F. A., Vanzin, T., & Ulbricht, V. R. (2015a) Recommendations for Inclusive Virtual Learning Environment from the Perspective of Archetypal Pattern of Otherness (Title Adapted). Sao Paulo: Ed. Pimenta Cultural.
[23]
Obregon, R. de F. A., Vanzin, T., & Ulbricht, V. R. (2015b) Different Perspectives of Creation and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Environments. Creative Education, 6, 564-575. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ce
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.66056
[24]
Powell, R. A., & Single, H. M. (1996) Focus Groups International. Journal of Quality in Health Care, 8, 499-504.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499
[25]
Pereira, A. T. C. (2007). Virtual Learning Environments: Different Contexts (Title Adapted). Rio de Janeiro: Ciência Moderna Ltda.
[26]
Spender, J. C. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106
[27]
Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
[28]
Vanzin, T. (2005) TEHCO—Hypermedia Environment Model with Error Treatment, Based on the Theory of Situated Cognition. Doctorate Thesis, Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering in the Federal University of Santa Catarina/UFSC (Title Adapted). Florianópolis.
