全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Relationship between Test Anxiety and Learning Styles of Architecture Undergraduates

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2016.72036, PP. 364-375

Keywords: Learning Style Inventory (LSI II), Architectural Education, Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Learning which starts with birth of human being and continues for a lifelong varies from person to person. It is known that learning style differences is an important factor that affects students’ success which is evaluated by examinations. If a student has high level of test anxiety, he will not get a good grade by choosing wrong answer because of his anxiety and he cannot show expected success level. The most important factor for increasing the success of architecture students who have different learning styles and different level of test anxiety is educating students by finding out differences at their learning styles and level of test anxiety. Therefore, this study aims to determine architecture students’ level of test anxiety and their learning styles. In addition, it is aimed to find out the relationship between learning styles and test anxiety. Besides, the relationship between architecture students’ level of test anxiety and some particular demographical properties (gender, age) are examined. With this context, data were collected from 347 architecture students from Gaziantep University, Zirve University and Hasan Kalyoncu University in 2015-2016 academic year. Learning style Inventory (LSI II) and Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used as an instrument for collecting the data. Percentage and frequency tests, crosstabs and Chi-Square hypothesis tests were performed by using SPSS 17 software. As a conclusion of this study, it is determined that there is a significant relationship between learning styles of architecture students and their test anxiety level.

References

[1]  Ashton, P. (2000). Collective Action for Design Learning-Social Interaction Analysis in the Design School Studio. In S. Scrivener, L. Ball, & A. Woodcock, Eds., Collaborative Design (pp. 513-524). London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0779-8_48
[2]  Carter, C., Bishop, J., & Kravits, S. L. (2000). Keys to Effective Learning (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[3]  Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Undergraduate and Graduate Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 268- 274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268
[4]  Chou, H. W., & Wang, T. B. (2000). The Influence of Learning Style and Training Method on Self-Efficacy and Learning Performance in WWW Homepage Design Training. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 455-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00040-2
[5]  Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on Architectural Design Process through Learning Styles. Design Studies, 24, 437-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9
[6]  Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning Styles of Design Students and the Relationship of Academic Performance and Gender in Design Education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007
[7]  Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1997). Effects of Cognitive Ability and Affect on School Mathematics Performance and Feelings of Difficulty. The American Journal of Psychology, 110, 225-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423716
[8]  Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1999). Individual Differences in School Mathematics Performance and Feelings of Difficulty: The Effects of Cognitive Ability, Affect, Age, and Gender. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173111
[9]  Everson, H. T., Millsap, R. E., & Rodriguez, C. M. (1991). Isolating Gender Differences in Test Anxiety: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Test Anxiety Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 243-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164491511024
[10]  Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
[11]  Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x
[12]  Gumusburun Ayalp, G., Senyigit, O., & Erman, O. (2015). Exploring the Learning Styles Characteristics of Turkish Freshman Architecture Students Wit the Evidence of Learning Style Inventory. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology of Balikesir University, 17, 68-82.
[13]  Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
[14]  Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1989). The Learning Styles Questionnaire, Peter Honey Publications. www.peterhoney.com
[15]  Hong, E. (1998). Differential Stability of Individual Differences in State and Trait Test Anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 51-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80142-3
[16]  Hsu, C. H. C. (1999). Learning Styles of Hospitality Students: Nature or Nurture? Hospitality Management, 18, 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(98)00045-0
[17]  Ibrahim, N., & Utaberta, N. (2012). Learning in Architecture Design Studio. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 30-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.342
[18]  Jonassen, H. D., & Grobowski, B. L. (1999). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction. New York: Taylor & Francis.
[19]  Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
[20]  Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[21]  Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning Style Inventory: Self Scoring Test and Interpretation Booklet. Boston, MA: McBer.
[22]  Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning Style Inventory. Boston, MA: McBer.
[23]  Kuri, N. P., & Truzzi, M. S. (2002). Learning Styles of Freshmen Engineering Students. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Engineering Education. Arlington, VA: International Network for Engineering Education & Research. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.12.8463&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[24]  Kvan, T., & Yunyan, J. (2005). Students’ Learning Styles and Their Correlation with Performance in Architectural Design Studio. Design Studies, 26, 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.004
[25]  Liebert, R. M., & Morris, C. W. (1967). Cognitive and Emotional Components of Test Anxiety: A Distinction and Some Initial Data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3.975
[26]  Liepmann, D., Marggraf, C., Felfe, J., & Hosemann, A. (1992). Anxiety, Action Orientation, Subjective State and Situational Aspects: A Study of Tank-Lorry Drivers. In K. Hagtvet, & T. B. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 130-141). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
[27]  Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Prichard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C. M., Mildren, B. A., Raad, J. M., Cornelius, R. A., & Janik, M. (2008). The Test Anxiety Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TAICA): Examination of the Psychometric Properties of a New Multidimensional Measure of Test Anxiety among Elementary and Secondary School Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734282907303760
[28]  Metallidou, P., & Vlachou, A. (2007). Motivational Beliefs, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement in Language and Mathematics in Elementary School Children. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207590500411179
[29]  Phillips, B. N., Martin, R. P., & Myers, J. (1972). Interventions in Relation to Anxiety in School. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 409-468). New York: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-657402-9.50011-9
[30]  Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a Categorisation of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170101
[31]  Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric Data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033456
[32]  Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, Anxiety and Cognitive Interferences: Reactions to Tests. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 929-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.929
[33]  Smith, D. M., & Kolb, D. A. (1996). User’s Guide for the Learning-Style Inventory: A Manual for Teachers and Trainers. Boston, MA: McBer.
[34]  Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test Anxiety Inventory: Preliminary Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[35]  Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test Anxiety: A Transactional Process Model. In C. D. Spielberger, & P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 3-14). Washington DC: Taylor & Francis.
[36]  Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, E. P., Taylor, C. J., Anton, W. D., Algaze, B., Ross, G. R., & Westberry, L. G. (1979). Preliminary Manual for the Test Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[37]  Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Algaze, B., & Anton, W. D. (1978). Examination Stress and Test Anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 111-131). New York: Hemisphere/Wiley.
[38]  Sub, A., & Prabha, C. (2003). Academic Performance in Relation to Perfectionism, Test Procrastination and Test Anxiety of High School Children. Psychological Studies, 48, 7-81.
[39]  Tucker, R. (2008). Learning Style Drift: Correlation between Built Environment Students’ Learning Styles and the Learning Styles of Their Teachers. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3, 68-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2008.03010068
[40]  Van der Ploeg, H. M. (1984). Worry, Emotionality, Intelligence, and Academic Performance in Male and Female Dutch Secondary School Children. In H. M. Van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (pp. 201-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[41]  Ware, W. B., Galassi, J. P., & Dew, K. M. H. (1990). The Test Anxiety Inventory: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Anxiety Research, 3, 205-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08917779008248753
[42]  Zeidner, M. (1990). Does Test Anxiety Bias Scholastic Aptitude Test Performance by Gender and Social Group? Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 145-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5501&2_14
[43]  Zeidner, M. (1998). Test Anxiety: The State of the Art. New York: Plenum Press.
[44]  Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). Test Anxiety in Intellectually Gifted Students. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 12, 163- 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248328

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133