This article discusses and experiments with a psychological constructionist account of the brain basis of emotion—the conceptual act model (Lindquist et al., 2012; Barrett et al., 2014) and the Deleuzian and Guattarian (1987; 2009) philosophical accounts of affect, concept and stratum. Why those two? The conceptual act model theorizes process of meaning making of external and internal sensations including experience of emotions. Deleuze and Guattari, with their accounts, reflect on various patterns of making meaning comprising those that lead to self-/criticism and creativity. Since it is crucial to think about teaching practices that support students in daring to challenge, problematize and generate new meaning of experienced sensations, theories that address meaning making processes are of particular relevance. This article shows that those theories alone and once exposed to an experiment may possibly inspire pedagogical undertakings that aim to create self-/critically-creative abilities among students, but also add to the ways of conceptualizing subject, body, mind and brain.
References
[1]
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2
[2]
Barrett, L. F. (2009). The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 326- 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01134.x
[3]
Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotions Are Real. Emotion, 12, 413-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027555
[4]
Barrett, L. F., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2014). A Psychological Construction Account of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: The Role of Situated Conceptualizations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), The Handbook of Emotion Regulation (2nd ed., pp. 447-465). New York: Guilford.
[5]
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, Situated Conceptualization, and Prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
[6]
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Incorporated.
[7]
Chapman, E., & O’Neill, M. (2010). Defining and Assessing Generic Competences in Australian Universities: Ongoing Challenges. Education Research and Perspectives, 37, 105-123.
[8]
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London and New York: Continuum.
[9]
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). What is Philosophy? London and New York: Verso.
[10]
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). The Brain Basis of Emotion: A meta- Analytic Review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 121-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000446
[11]
Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). A Functional Architecture of the Human Brain: Insights from Emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 533-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.005
[12]
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
[13]
Semetsky, I. (2009). Deleuze as a Philosopher of Education: Affective Knowledge/Effective Learning. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 14, 443-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770902999534
[14]
Waaldijk, B., & Just, E. (Eds.) (2010). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.