全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

轨道交通线网方案比选的多目标格序决策方法

, PP. 76-82

Keywords: 轨道交通,线网规划,方案比选,格序决策,指标体系,综合差异值

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对实际中决策者决策理性的有限性缺陷,将多目标格序决策方法引入到轨道交通线网方案比选中,构建了轨道交通线网方案多目标格序决策评价指标体系,依据指标类型对指标进行无量纲化处理,综合决策者主观权与数据离散度客观权去计算评价指标的相对权重。结合决策矩阵,通过对各方案综合差异值的计算,实现备选方案的格序化排序,应用该决策方法对某市4套备选轨道交通线网方案进行评价。分析结果表明4套方案的综合差异值分别为0.66、0.56、0.24、0.83,相应排序结果与实际情况一致,该决策方法合理。

References

[1]  苏朝霞.城市轨道交通线网规划综合评价的模型和方法[J].物流科技,2010(6):143-145. SU Zhao-xia. The model and method on evaluating of the line-net planning for urban rail transit[J]. Logistics Sci-Tech, 2010(6): 143-145.(in Chinese)
[2]  纪嘉伦,李福志.城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价指标体系研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(3):129-133. JI Jia-lun, LI Fu-zhi. A study on the synthetic evaluation index system of urban rail transit line network planning scheme[J]. Systems Engineering―Theory & Practice, 2004, 24(3): 129-133.(in Chinese)
[3]  刘海宁,王明生,温少芳. 基于灰色关联度法的轨道交通线网评价[J].石家庄铁道学院学报:自然科学版,2007,20(4):101-103. LIU Hai-ning, WANG Ming-sheng, WEN Shao-fang. Evaluation of urban mass transit network based on grey correlation degree method[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Railway Institute: Natural Science, 2007, 20(4): 101-103.(in Chinese)
[4]  郭 强,郭春香,郭耀煌.基于格序偏好距离的群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2010,32(2):298-302. GUO Qiang, GUO Chun-xiang, GUO Yao-huang. Method of group decision-making based on the distance of lattice order preferences[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(2): 298-302.(in Chinese)
[5]  郝 光,牟奇峰,张殿业,等.基于格序偏好的模糊多目标决策方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2006,41(4):517-521. HAO Guang, MOU Qi-feng, ZHANG Dian-ye, et al. Approach of fuzzy multi-objective decision-making based on lattice-order preference[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong Univesity, 2006, 41(4): 517-521.(in Chinese)
[6]  COOK W D. Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking[J]. European Journal of Oper-ational Research, 2006, 172(2): 369-385.
[7]  MOTA C M D M, ALMEIDA A T D, ALENCAR L H. A multiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2009, 27(2): 175-181
[8]  陈旭梅,李凤军,马林涛.城市轨道交通线网方案综合评价指标体系研究[J].城市规划,2001,25(10):61-64. CHEN Xu-mei, LI Feng-jun, MA Lin-tao. The study on the criterion system for comprehensive evaluation of the urban rail network[J]. City Planning Review, 2001, 25(10): 61-64.(in Chinese)
[9]  郭春香,郭耀煌.格序决策的格序化研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(5):463-466. GUO Chun-xiang, GUO Yao-huang. The study of lattice ordering under lattice order decision making theory[J]. Systems Engineering―Theory Methodology Applications, 2004, 13(5): 463-466.(in Chinese)
[10]  OLCER A I, ODABASI A Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1): 93-114.
[11]  KAO C. Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, 34(7): 1779-1787.
[12]  CHEN Y, MARC KILGOUR D, HIPEL K W. An extreme-distance approach to multiple criteria ranking[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011, 53(5/6): 646-658.
[13]  JABEUR K, MARTEL J M. A collective choice method based on individual preferences relational systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 177(3): 1549-1565.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133