全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparison of Abstracts Written by Native Speakers and Second Language Learners

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2015.55041, PP. 470-474

Keywords: Abstracts, Swales IMRC (Introduction, Method, Results, Conclusion) Model, Genre Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

As an ideal vehicle for projecting news value, the journal abstract appears to be growing in importance, as noted by a number of writers, but the studies are still not enough, especially comparison study between the abstracts written by native speaker and second language learner. So this paper tries to find out both similarities and differences in structure of abstracts from these two groups through genre analysis of two corpuses: one for abstracts from native speakers, the other for abstracts from Chinese English learners. The results indicate that the Chinese learners focus too much on introduction move and can’t use tense properly in all cased. This result leads us to consider the teaching of writing for special purpose.

References

[1]  Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
[2]  Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[3]  Ge, D. M., & Yang, R. Y. (2005). A Genre Analysis of Research Article Abstracts. Modern Foreign Language (Quarterly), 28, 138-146.
[4]  Ju, Y. M. (2004). A Genre Analysis of English and Chinese Research Article Abstracts. Foreign Language Education, 25, 32-36.
[5]  Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[6]  Yu, L., & Liang, Y.G. (2006). The Writing Style of English Research Article Abstracts. Foreign Language Education, 27, 34-37.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133