In quantum
games based on 2-player-N-strategies
classical games, each player has a quNit (a normalized vector in an N-dimensional Hilbert space HN) upon which he applies his
strategy (a matrix U∈SU(N)). The players draw their payoffs from a state . Here ?and J (both determined by the game’s referee) are respectively an unentangled 2-quNit (pure) state and
a unitary operator such that ?is partially
entangled. The existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium in the
quantum game is intimately related to the degree of entanglement of . Hence, it is
practical to design the entangler J= J(β) to be
dependent on a single real parameter βthat controls the degree of
entanglement of , such that its
von-Neumann entropy SN(β) is continuous and obtains any
value in . Designing J(β) for N=2 is quite standard. Extension to N>2 is not obvious, and here we
suggest an algorithm to achieve it. Such construction provides a special
quantum gate that should be a useful tool not only in quantum games but, more
generally, as a special gate in manipulating quantum information protocols.
References
[1]
Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 26, Fig. 1.13.
[2]
Band, Y.B. and Avishai, Y. (2013) Quantum Mechanics with Application to Nanotechnology and Information Science. Academic Press, Waltham, p 217.
[3]
Goldenberg, L., Vaidman, L. and Wiesner, S. (1999) Quantum Gambling. Physical Review Letters, 82, 3356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3356
Eisert, J., Wilkens, M. and Lewenstein, M. (1999) Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies. Physical Review Letters, 83, 3077-3080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3077
[6]
Flitney, A.P. and Abbott, D. (2002) An Introduction to Quantum Game Theory. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 2, R175-R187. arXiv: quant-ph/0208069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219477502000981
[7]
Piotrowski, E.W. andSlaadkowski, J. (2003) An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42, 1089-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025443111388
[8]
Landsburg, S.E. (2004) Quantum Game Theory. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 394-399.
[9]
Iqbal, A. (2004) Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games. Ph.D thesis, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 137 p. arXiv:quant-phys/050317.
[10]
Sharif, P. and Heydari, H. (2014) Quantum Information and Computation, 14, 0295.
[11]
Landsburg, S.E. (2011) Nash Equilibria in Quantum Games. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 139, 4423-4434. arXiv:1110.1351.
[12]
Benjamin, S.C. and Hayden, P.M. (2001) Comment on “Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies”. Physical Review Letters, 87, Article ID: 069801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.069801
[13]
Du, J., Li, H., Xu, X., Han, R. and Zhou, X. (2002) Entanglement Enhanced Multiplayer Quantum Games. Physics Letters A, 302, 229-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01144-1
[14]
Du, J., Xu, X., Li, H., Zhou, X. and Han, R. (2002) Playing Prisoner’s Dilemma with Quantum Rules. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 2, R189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219477502000993
[15]
Flitney, A.P. and Abbott, D. (2003) Advantage of a Quantum Player over a Classical One in 2 × 2 Quantum Games. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 459, 2463-2474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1136
[16]
Flitney, A.P. and Hollenberg, L.C.L. (2007) Nash Equilibria in Quantum Games with Generalized Two-Parameter Strategies. Physics Letters A, 363, 381-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.044
[17]
Avishai, Y. (2012) Some Topics in Quantum Games. MA Thesis in Economics, Ben Gurion University, Beersheba, 96 p. arXiv:1306.0284. (Submitted on August 2012 to the Faculty of Social Science and Humanities at the Ben Gurion University).
[18]
Osborne, M.J. and Rubinstein, A. (2011) A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Version: 2011-1-19. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.