The structures damage conditions assessment requires numerous precautions to ensure the safety of people during site visits and inspections. Among several methods providing useful information about the conservation status of the structures, dynamic monitoring techniques are suitable to retrieve the global behavior of the buildings. The anomalous features diagnosis of the structural dynamic response is an index of alterations of the material state and, in the worst cases, is related to the presence of damaged structural elements. This paper proposes the use of remote control systems for the structural evaluation of the damage state of buildings and describes the results achieved in an interesting application: the experimental dynamic analysis carried out on the inaccessible damaged bell tower of the Church of Santi Giacomo and Filippo in Mirandola (Italy). The study is based on observations performed using the IBIS-S ground-based radar interferometer to remotely measure the displacements of several elements of the building above 0.01？mm amplitude. This totally noninvasive and nondestructive approach has proved to be reliably implemented as a useful method to structural health monitoring procedures and especially for extensive and fast inspection analyses aiming at the first evaluation of the damage level and the soundness of slender buildings after earthquakes. 1. Introduction Structural damage identification is a fundamental element following an earthquake. A correct definition of the damage state of buildings allows us to establish technical procedures and operational standards for safeguarding the structures, aimed at restoring their original conditions. Structural Health Monitoring techniques (SHM) make it possible to deduce the presence of lesions and estimate the severity of the damage to the structures by measuring the mode of vibration of the buildings. This is possible because the dynamic response of structures is strongly influenced by the conservation state of materials and by structural lesions. The scientific literature includes many methods of structural dynamic response evaluation and algorithms for the extraction of main modal parameters [1, 2]. Several experimental configurations are classified in function of the number of measured output signals (number of sensors) and of the type of sources used to energize the structures. In this context, there are several experimental layouts to modal parameters identification. Specifically, it is possible to differentiate between forced vibration tests (i.e., using mechanical shaker or vibrodines),
References
[1]
S. S. Ivanovic, M. D. Trifunac, and M. I. Todorovska, “Ambient vibration tests of structures: a review,” Bulletin of Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, vol. 37, no. 4, article 407, pp. 165–197, 2000.
[2]
H. Sohn, C. R. Farrar, F. M. Hemez et al., “A Review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2004.
[3]
N. M. M. Maia, J. M. M. Silva, J. He et al., Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[4]
M. Pieraccini, M. Fratini, F. Parrini, G. Pinelli, and C. Atzeni, “Dynamic survey of architectural heritage by high-speed microwave interferometry,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–30, 2005.
[5]
M. Pieraccini, M. Fratini, D. Dei, and C. Atzeni, “Structural testing of historical heritage site towers by microwave remote sensing,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 174–182, 2009.
[6]
C. Atzeni, A. Bicci, D. Dei, M. Fratini, and M. Pieraccini, “Remote survey of the leaning tower of pisa by interferometric sensing,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 185–189, 2010.
[7]
C. Gentile and G. Bernardini, “Output-only modal identification of a reinforced concrete bridge from radar-based measurements,” NDT & E International, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 544–553, 2008.
[8]
C. Gentile and G. Bernardini, “An interferometric radar for non-contact measurement of deflections on civil engineering structures: Laboratory and full-scale tests,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 521–534, 2010.
[9]
C. Gentile, “Application of microwave remote sensing to dynamic testing of stay-cables,” Remote Sensing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–51, 2010.
[10]
C. Gentile, “Deflection measurement on vibrating stay cables by non-contact microwave interferometer,” NDT & E International, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 231–240, 2010.
[11]
D. R. Wehner, High-Resolution Radar, Artech House, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1995.
[12]
F. M. Henderson and A. J. Lewis, Manual of Remote Sensing. Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[13]
J. D. Taylor, Ultra-Wideband Radar Technology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001.
[14]
E. Andreoli, San Giacomo Roncole: Raccolta Di Notizie Storiografiche Popolari, Mirandola Edizioni, Mirandola, Italy, 1987.
[15]
R. Brincker, L. Zhang, and P. Andersen, “Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 441–445, 2001.
[16]
G. Luzi, O. Monserrat, and M. Crosetto, “Real aperture radar interferometry as a tool for buildings vibration monitoring: limits and potentials from an experimental study,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Vibration Measurements by Laser and Non-contact Techniques (AIVELA '12), pp. 309–317, Ancona, Italy, 2012.
[17]
C. Rainieri and G. Fabbrocino, “Estimating the elastic period of Masonry towers,” in Proceedings of the SEM IMAC 30th Conference, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Jacksonville, Fla, USA, 2012.
